Risk assessment method of gas explosion based on quantification of margins and uncertainties (QMU):a case study on beam structures in buildings

被引:8
|
作者
Li, Shuwen [1 ]
Rong, Xiaoli [2 ]
Hu, Jie [2 ]
Wang, Mingyang [2 ,3 ]
Qu, Qingye [1 ]
Huang, Jiayu [1 ]
Guo, Xinwen [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Sci, Nanjing 210094, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Nanjing 210094, Peoples R China
[3] Army Engn Univ PLA, State Key Lab Explos & Impact & Disaster Prevent &, Nanjing 210007, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Building safety; Gas explosion; Risk assessment; QMU; Parameter sensitivity; REACTOR SAFETY MARGINS; EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2023.02.024
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Combustible gas explosions are common accidents in residential areas. Key building structural components, such as beams, slabs and columns, can be quickly damaged and destroyed by explosive overpressure loads, which may also result in continual collapse. Risk of interior gas explosions in buildings should be assessed to analyze the ability of structures to withstand disasters, which can also offer a theoretical basis for improving the structural design and construction of buildings. In this study, reinforced concrete beams in buildings were selected as the research object, and the risks to beam structures under mixed methane and air explosions were assessed using the quantification of margins and uncertainties (QMU) method. First, the uncertainty of the existing methods to calculate gas explosion and beam bending loads was analyzed. Through an influence regularity analysis, the expansion factor of combustible gas combustion products in enclosed explosion chamber, the initial density of the gas mixture in the explosion chamber before deflagration, the compressive strength of concrete, and the tensile strength of reinforcement were selected as the key uncertainty parameters. Furthermore, the Monte Carlo method was used to create 5000 samples of the selected uncertainty parameters, and statistical analysis was conducted to obtain the probability distribution of the gas explosion overpressure load and reinforced concrete beam bending load. Based on the sampling results, the beam structure's safety margin and uncertainty analysis were analyzed to determine the probability of structural failure at the 90% confidence level. Finally, this paper provides guidelines for determining structural failure under different boundary value conditions of combustion explosion overpressure loads and reveals the sensitivity of different uncertainty parameters to structural safety margins using stepwise regression analysis. Compared to previous methods, this work includes the uncertainty features of disasters and disaster-bearing items when analyzing combustible gas explosion accidents; we antic-ipate it offers a fresh perspective on the quantitative assessment of gas explosion risks in buildings.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 62
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using the HAZOP Method to Conduct a Risk Assessment on the Dismantling of Large Industrial Machines and Associated Structures: Case Study
    Joubert, Francois
    Steyn, Elsabe
    Pretorius, Leon
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 147 (01)
  • [22] Improvement of integrity management for pressure vessels based on risk assessment-A natural gas separator case study
    Liao, Kexi
    Qin, Min
    He, Guoxi
    Chen, Sijia
    Jiang, Xinhui
    Zhang, Shijian
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2023, 83
  • [23] The method of radiation risk assessment based on physico-geographical regionalisation: a case study of Carpathians, Poland
    Jędrzejek, Filip
    Szarlowicz, Katarzyna
    Stobiński, Marcin
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (57) : 65533 - 65547
  • [24] Risk Assessment of Flash Flood to Buildings Using an Indicator-Based Methodology: A Case Study of Mountainous Rural Settlements in Southwest China
    Zhen, Yiwei
    Liu, Shuguang
    Zhong, Guihui
    Zhou, Zhengzheng
    Liang, Jiyu
    Zheng, Weiqiang
    Fang, Qi
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [25] Structural Assessment of Case Study Historical and Modern Buildings in the Florentine Area Based on a PSI-Driven Seismic and Hydrogeological Risk Analysis
    Pratesi, Fabio
    Tapete, Deodato
    Terenzi, Gloria
    Del Ventisette, Chiara
    Moretti, Sandro
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY FOR SOCIETY AND TERRITORY, VOL 8: PRESERVATION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE, 2015, : 345 - 349
  • [26] Supplier Risk Assessment Based on Best-Worst Method and K-Means Clustering: A Case Study
    Kara, Merve Er
    Firat, Seniye Umit Oktay
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (04)
  • [27] Flooding Risk Assessment and Analysis Based on GIS and the TFN-AHP Method: A Case Study of Chongqing, China
    Cai, Shunyao
    Fan, Jiamin
    Yang, Wei
    ATMOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (05)
  • [28] Action Selection Based on Fuzzy AHP-Based TOPSIS Method in Fuzzy FMEA-Based Risk Assessment: A Case Study
    Oturakci, Murat
    Konyalioglu, Aziz Kemal
    INTELLIGENT AND FUZZY SYSTEMS: DIGITAL ACCELERATION AND THE NEW NORMAL, INFUS 2022, VOL 1, 2022, 504 : 369 - 377
  • [29] GIS-based Settlement Risk Assessment and its Effect on Surface Structures: A Case Study for the Tabriz Metro—line 1
    Arash Esmatkhah Irani
    Ali Azadi
    Mahdi Nikbakht
    Mohammad Azarafza
    Masoud Hajialilue Bonab
    Fariba Behrooz Sarand
    Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2022, 40 : 5081 - 5102
  • [30] Developing a geomechanics-modeling based method for lost circulation risk assessment: A case study in Bohai Bay, China
    Cai, Wenjun
    Deng, Jingen
    Feng, Yongcun
    Lin, Hai
    Tanko, Mohamadou Oumarou
    Ma, Chengyun
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 210