Risk assessment method of gas explosion based on quantification of margins and uncertainties (QMU):a case study on beam structures in buildings

被引:8
|
作者
Li, Shuwen [1 ]
Rong, Xiaoli [2 ]
Hu, Jie [2 ]
Wang, Mingyang [2 ,3 ]
Qu, Qingye [1 ]
Huang, Jiayu [1 ]
Guo, Xinwen [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Sci, Nanjing 210094, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Nanjing 210094, Peoples R China
[3] Army Engn Univ PLA, State Key Lab Explos & Impact & Disaster Prevent &, Nanjing 210007, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Building safety; Gas explosion; Risk assessment; QMU; Parameter sensitivity; REACTOR SAFETY MARGINS; EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2023.02.024
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Combustible gas explosions are common accidents in residential areas. Key building structural components, such as beams, slabs and columns, can be quickly damaged and destroyed by explosive overpressure loads, which may also result in continual collapse. Risk of interior gas explosions in buildings should be assessed to analyze the ability of structures to withstand disasters, which can also offer a theoretical basis for improving the structural design and construction of buildings. In this study, reinforced concrete beams in buildings were selected as the research object, and the risks to beam structures under mixed methane and air explosions were assessed using the quantification of margins and uncertainties (QMU) method. First, the uncertainty of the existing methods to calculate gas explosion and beam bending loads was analyzed. Through an influence regularity analysis, the expansion factor of combustible gas combustion products in enclosed explosion chamber, the initial density of the gas mixture in the explosion chamber before deflagration, the compressive strength of concrete, and the tensile strength of reinforcement were selected as the key uncertainty parameters. Furthermore, the Monte Carlo method was used to create 5000 samples of the selected uncertainty parameters, and statistical analysis was conducted to obtain the probability distribution of the gas explosion overpressure load and reinforced concrete beam bending load. Based on the sampling results, the beam structure's safety margin and uncertainty analysis were analyzed to determine the probability of structural failure at the 90% confidence level. Finally, this paper provides guidelines for determining structural failure under different boundary value conditions of combustion explosion overpressure loads and reveals the sensitivity of different uncertainty parameters to structural safety margins using stepwise regression analysis. Compared to previous methods, this work includes the uncertainty features of disasters and disaster-bearing items when analyzing combustible gas explosion accidents; we antic-ipate it offers a fresh perspective on the quantitative assessment of gas explosion risks in buildings.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 62
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk evaluation and analysis of a gas tank explosion based on a vapor cloud explosion model: A case study
    Zhang, Qingtao
    Zhou, Gang
    Hu, Yingying
    Wang, Shicong
    Sun, Biao
    Yin, Wenjing
    Guo, Fengshou
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2019, 101 : 22 - 35
  • [2] Risk assessment method in relation to coal mine gas explosion based on safety information loss
    Guo, Huimin
    Cheng, Lianhua
    Li, Shugang
    Jiang, Bolin
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2024, 43 (04) : 651 - 658
  • [3] Risk Assessment of Miners' Unsafe Behaviors: A Case Study of Gas Explosion Accidents in Coal Mine, China
    Tong, Ruipeng
    Yang, Yunyun
    Ma, Xiaofei
    Zhang, Yanwei
    Li, Shian
    Yang, Hongqing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (10)
  • [4] Flood Risk Assessment of Buildings Based on Vulnerability Curve: A Case Study in Anji County
    Liu, Shuguang
    Zheng, Weiqiang
    Zhou, Zhengzheng
    Zhong, Guihui
    Zhen, Yiwei
    Shi, Zheng
    WATER, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [5] Quantitative Method of the Structural Damage Identification of Gas Explosion Based on Case Study:The Shanxi “11. 23” Explosion Investigation
    Huanjuan Zhao
    Yiran Yan
    Xinming Qian
    JournalofBeijingInstituteofTechnology, 2018, 27 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [6] Study on remote fire risk assessment method for industrial buildings based on image recognition technology
    Fan C.
    Li Y.
    Wang Z.
    Shen J.
    Li J.
    Zhuang Y.
    Tumu Gongcheng Xuebao/China Civil Engineering Journal, 2024, 57 (02): : 87 - 95
  • [7] A Comprehensive Risk-Assessment Method for Prefabricated Buildings Using EPC: A Case Study from China
    Xia, Manman
    Zhao, Lemeng
    Zhao, Li
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [8] UNCERTAINTIES IN HEALTH-RISK ASSESSMENT - AN INTEGRATED CASE-STUDY BASED ON TETRACHLOROETHYLENE IN CALIFORNIA GROUNDWATER
    MCKONE, TE
    BOGEN, KT
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 15 (01) : 86 - 103
  • [9] Risk Assessment of Coal Mine Gas Explosion Based on Fault Tree Analysis and Fuzzy Polymorphic Bayesian Network: A Case Study of Wangzhuang Coal Mine
    Yang, Jinhui
    Zhao, Jin
    Shao, Liangshan
    PROCESSES, 2023, 11 (09)
  • [10] Risk Assessment and Field Case Study on Oil/Natural Gas Explosion during High-Pressure Air Injection Process
    Huang, Lijuan
    Wang, Yu
    Zhang, Liang
    Pei, Shufeng
    Zhang, Zhe
    Su, Yuliang
    Ren, Shaoran
    SPE JOURNAL, 2022, 27 (01): : 806 - 819