Functional Outcomes of Dorsal Bridge Plating for Lisfranc Injuries With Routine Implant Retention: A Major Trauma Center Experience

被引:2
|
作者
Onochie, Elliot [1 ]
Bua, Nelson [1 ]
Mmerem, Kingsley [1 ]
Heidari, Nima [1 ]
Vris, Alexandros [1 ]
Malagelada, Francesc [1 ]
Parker, Lee [1 ]
Jeyaseelan, Luckshmana [1 ]
机构
[1] Barts Hlth NHS Trust, Barts Bone & Joint Hlth, Whitechapel Rd, London E1 1FR, England
关键词
Lisfranc; midfoot; open reduction internal fixation; bridge pate; outcomes; implant retention; hardware retention; metalwork retention; FRACTURE-DISLOCATIONS; INTERNAL-FIXATION; OPEN REDUCTION; PRIMARY ARTHRODESIS; TRANSARTICULAR SCREWS; JOINT INJURIES;
D O I
10.1097/BOT.0000000000002469
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To assess medium-term functional outcomes and the complication profile for unstable Lisfranc injuries treated with dorsal bridge plate (DBP) fixation when implants are not routinely removed. Design: Large single-center retrospective case series. Setting: Level-1 Trauma Center, London, United Kingdom. Patients: Consecutive cases of skeletally mature individuals with unstable Lisfranc injuries treated operatively between 2014 and 2019. Intervention: Open reduction and DBP fixation with implants not routinely removed. Main Outcome Measurements: Patient-reported outcome measures at final follow-up. The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire summary index was the primary outcome measure. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot scale, complications, and all-cause reoperation rates were secondary outcome measures. Logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors that influenced outcomes. Results: Eighty-five patients were included. Mean follow-up was 40.8 months (24-72). The mean Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire Summary Index was 27.0 (SD 7.1) and mean AOFAS score 72.6 (SD 11.6). The presence of an intra-articular fracture was associated with poorer outcomes, with worse MOXFQ and AOFAS scores (both P < 0.001). Eighteen patients (21%) required implants removal, with this more likely in female patients (OR 3.89, 95% confidence interval, 1.27 to 12.0, P = 0.02). Eight patients (9%) required secondary arthrodesis. Conclusions: This is the largest series of Lisfranc injuries treated with DBP fixation reported to-date and the only to routinely retain implants. Medium-term outcomes are comparable to existing literature in which implants are routinely removed. The presence of an intra-articular fracture is a poor prognostic indicator. Implant removal is more likely to be needed in female patients.
引用
收藏
页码:E22 / E27
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [21] A Comparison of Trans-Articular Screw Versus Dorsal Bridge Plate Versus Compression Locking Plate Fixation in B2 Lis Franc Injuries: A 5-Year Experience in a Level 1 Trauma Center, in the United Kingdom
    Kommalapti, Varun
    Wek, Caesar
    Coffey, Duncan
    Hardwick, Tim
    Reichert, Ines
    Ahluwalia, Raju
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2022, 61 (06): : 1191 - 1196
  • [22] Emergency Anesthesiology Encounters, Care Practices, and Outcomes for Patients with Firearm Injuries: A 9-Year Single-Center US Level 1 Trauma Experience
    Walters, Andrew M.
    Aichholz, Pudkrong
    Muldowney, Maeve
    Van Cleve, Wil
    Hess, John R.
    Stansbury, Lynn G.
    Vavilala, Monica S.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2025, 140 (03): : 554 - 563