Comparative analysis of hydrogen, methane and nitrogen relative permeability: Implications for Underground Hydrogen Storage

被引:7
|
作者
Higgs, Scott [1 ]
Da Wang, Ying [1 ]
Sun, Chenhao [3 ]
Ennis-King, Jonathan [2 ]
Jackson, Samuel J. [2 ]
Armstrong, Ryan T. [1 ]
Mostaghimi, Peyman [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
[2] CSIRO Energy, Clayton, Australia
[3] China Univ Petr, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Underground hydrogen storage; Renewable energy sources; Cushion gas; Wettability; Relative permeability; Capillary trapping; Contact angle; INTERFACIAL-TENSION; CAPILLARY-PRESSURE; CARBON-DIOXIDE; CONTACT-ANGLE; FLOW BEHAVIOR; NATURAL-GAS; PLUS WATER; WETTABILITY; HETEROGENEITY; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.est.2023.108827
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Underground Hydrogen Storage (UHS) is an emerging technology which aims to store terawatt-scale energy in the subsurface to alleviate daily and seasonal fluctuations in the ever-increasing renewable energy market. Depleted gas reservoirs and aquifers will be the main targets of storage which requires an understanding of the interaction between formation or cushion gas with native brine. A comprehensive comparison of the petrophysical and two-phase flow properties of the hydrogen-water, methane-water and nitrogen-water systems at insitu conditions is the focus of our work. We conduct steady-state relative permeability experiments at 2.13 MPa and 298 K using identical capillary numbers of Nc = 2.92 x 10-7 for all three systems. The saturation and in-situ contact angles are determined with segmentation of 3D micro-CT images. The contact angle of each system is almost identical at the irreducible water saturation, Swi, 44 degrees, 46 degrees, 45 degrees, respectively, as is the interfacial tension of 72.0, 71.5 and 71mN/m, respectively. The capillary pressure-saturation relationships for each system have a maximum difference of 3.8 % which leads to approximately equivalent relative permeability in the Bentheimer sandstone core. The end-point relative permeabilities are k0 rg = 0.049, k0 rg = 0.045 and k0 rg = 0.062 at irreducible water saturations of Swi = 0.24, Swi = 0.25 and Swi = 0.23, respectively. All three gases demonstrate equivalent flow properties which indicates that both nitrogen and methane are suitable analogue gases for laboratory multiphase flow experiments and cushion gas to improve safety and the economics of commercial UHS projects. The results enable history matched depleted gas reservoir performance to be used as a guide for UHS.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evolution of Gas Permeability of Rock Salt Under Different Loading Conditions and Implications on the Underground Hydrogen Storage in Salt Caverns
    D. Grgic
    F. Al Sahyouni
    F. Golfier
    M. Moumni
    L. Schoumacker
    [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2022, 55 : 691 - 714
  • [32] The impact of humic acid on hydrogen adsorptive capacity of eagle ford shale: Implications for underground hydrogen storage
    Abid, Hussein Rasool
    Yekeen, Nurudeen
    Al-Yaseri, Ahmed
    Keshavarz, Alireza
    Iglauer, Stefan
    [J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 55
  • [33] Effect of salinity, mineralogy, and organic materials in hydrogen wetting and its implications for underground hydrogen storage (UHS)
    Chen, Yongqiang
    Niasar, Vahid
    Ma, Lin
    Xie, Quan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2023, 48 (84) : 32839 - 32848
  • [34] Comparison of hydrogen and methane storage by means of a thermodynamic analysis
    Tietze, Vanessa
    Stolten, Detlef
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2015, 40 (35) : 11530 - 11537
  • [35] Underground Hydrogen Storage Technology: a Method for Large-scale Hydrogen Storage
    Zhou Qingfan
    [J]. China Oil & Gas, 2022, 29 (06) : 13 - 20
  • [36] In-situ hydrogen wettability characterisation for underground hydrogen storage
    Higgs, Scott
    Da Wang, Ying
    Sun, Chenhao
    Ennis-King, Jonathan J.
    Jackson, Samuel T.
    Armstrong, Ryan
    Mostaghimi, Peyman
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2022, 47 (26) : 13062 - 13075
  • [37] Editorial: Microbiology of underground hydrogen storage
    Dopffel, Nicole
    An-Stepec, Biwen Annie
    de Rezende, Julia R.
    Sousa, Diana Z.
    Koerdt, Andrea
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2023, 11
  • [38] Challenging perceptions of underground hydrogen storage
    Edlmann, Katriona
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 5 (07) : 478 - 480
  • [39] Research Progress in Underground Hydrogen Storage
    Lu, Wang
    Zhijun, Jin
    Zeiyu, Lü
    Yutong, Su
    [J]. Diqiu Kexue - Zhongguo Dizhi Daxue Xuebao/Earth Science - Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2024, 49 (06): : 2044 - 2057
  • [40] Underground hydrogen storage: A UK perspective
    Jahanbakhsh, Amir
    Potapov-Crighton, Alexander Louis
    Mosallanezhad, Abdolali
    Kaloorazi, Nina Tohidi
    Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2024, 189