Rituximab Reference vs Biosimilar Utilization for Oncology vs Nononcology Indications

被引:0
|
作者
Labdi, Bonnie A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Elbeshbeshy, Rim A. [1 ,2 ]
Winkler, Michelle [1 ,2 ]
Johnson, Samuel G. [1 ,2 ]
Attridge, Rebecca L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Craneware Grp, Deerfield Beach, FL USA
[2] Long Isl Univ Pharm, Brooklyn, NY USA
[3] MJH Life Sci, Cranbury, NJ USA
[4] MJH Life Sci, 2 Clarke Dr,Ste 100, Cranbury, NJ 08512 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE | 2023年 / 29卷 / 11期
关键词
PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.37765/ajmc.2023.89461
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Limited data exist on the adoption of rituximab biosimilars vs the reference product by indication. Available data from real -world studies comparing rituximab biosimilar and reference use have focused predominantly on oncology indications. This is the first study to assess the utilization of the 3 US rituximab biosimilars vs the reference product. STUDY DESIGN: Comparative analysis. METHODS: Deidentified real -world data of rituximab, rituximab-abbs, rituximab-pvvr, and rituximab-arrx dispensations between December 31, 2018, and February 1, 2022, were extracted using Trisus Medication Compare (The Craneware Group). The primary outcome was rituximab reference vs biosimilar utilization for oncology vs nononcology indications. Results were stratified by on -label and off -label use and treatment settings. RESULTS: A total of 28,025 encounters were captured for rituximab and its biosimilars across 193 facilities (rituximab: n = 23,395; biosimilars, n = 4631 [rituximab-abbs: n = 2550; rituximab-pvvr, n = 2081; rituximab-arrx: n = 0]). Rituximab reference had higher dispensations for oncology (78.4%) and nononcology (88.3%) indications than its biosimilars (21.6% and 11.7%, respectively; P < .01). The 3 -year annual trends from 2019 to 2021 revealed decreased rituximab reference utilization (99.99% to 40.1%) and increased biosimilar use (0.01% to 59.9%). Most oncology dispensations were on label (94.5%), whereas most nononcology dispensations were off label (73.6%; P < .01). A higher proportion of biosimilar use was attributed to on -label indications (67.7%; off -label, 32.2%) compared with rituximab reference (58.0% vs 42.0%, respectively; P < .01). Nonacademic settings showed higher biosimilar adoption than academic settings (22.2% vs 10.3%, respectively; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Real -world evidence shows an increase in rituximab biosimilar adoption over time, with higher adoption for oncology vs nononcology indications and in nonacademic settings.
引用
收藏
页码:E353 / E356
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Colonic Trauma: Indications for Diversion vs. Repair
    Joe DuBose
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2009, 13 : 403 - 404
  • [42] Trabeculectomy indications - when to do it (Trab vs MIGS)
    Besinis, Dimitrios
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2022, 100
  • [43] Biosimilar vs originator insulins: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yamada, Tomohide
    Kamata, Ryuichi
    Ishinohachi, Kotomi
    Shojima, Nobuhiro
    Ananiadou, Sophia
    Nom, Hisashi
    Yamauchi, Toshimasa
    Kadowaki, Takashi
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2018, 20 (07): : 1787 - 1792
  • [44] Surgical masks vs respirators: properties and indications for use
    Checchi, Vittorio
    Checchi, Luigi
    DENTAL CADMOS, 2020, 88 (07) : 436 - 447
  • [45] Colonic Trauma: Indications for Diversion vs. Repair
    DuBose, Joe
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2009, 13 (03) : 403 - 404
  • [46] Marginal mandibulectomy vs segmental mandibulectomy - Indications and controversies
    Wax, MK
    Bascom, DA
    Myers, LL
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2002, 128 (05) : 600 - 603
  • [47] Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Imperative vs Elective Indications
    Long, Jean-Alexandre
    Lee, Byron
    Eyraud, Remi
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Hillyer, Shahab
    Stein, Robert J.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (04) : 833 - 837
  • [48] Analytical similarity assessment of rituximab biosimilar CT-P10 to reference medicinal product
    Lee, Kyoung Hoon
    Lee, Jihun
    Bae, Jin Soo
    Kim, Yeon Jung
    Kang, Hyun Ah
    Kim, Sung Hwan
    Lee, So Jung
    Lim, Ki Jung
    Lee, Jung Woo
    Jung, Soon Kwan
    Chang, Shin Jae
    MABS, 2018, 10 (03) : 380 - 396
  • [49] PHOSPHOGYPSUM AS A WASTE MATERIAL - UTILIZATION VS DISPOSAL
    KUNTZE, RA
    JOYCE, IH
    LUCKEVICH, LM
    CIM BULLETIN, 1984, 77 (866): : 65 - 66
  • [50] DEPOSITIONAL RELATIONSHIPS VS COAL UTILIZATION PARAMETERS
    PEACH, A
    CIM BULLETIN, 1988, 81 (915): : 47 - 47