Rituximab Reference vs Biosimilar Utilization for Oncology vs Nononcology Indications

被引:0
|
作者
Labdi, Bonnie A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Elbeshbeshy, Rim A. [1 ,2 ]
Winkler, Michelle [1 ,2 ]
Johnson, Samuel G. [1 ,2 ]
Attridge, Rebecca L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Craneware Grp, Deerfield Beach, FL USA
[2] Long Isl Univ Pharm, Brooklyn, NY USA
[3] MJH Life Sci, Cranbury, NJ USA
[4] MJH Life Sci, 2 Clarke Dr,Ste 100, Cranbury, NJ 08512 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE | 2023年 / 29卷 / 11期
关键词
PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.37765/ajmc.2023.89461
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Limited data exist on the adoption of rituximab biosimilars vs the reference product by indication. Available data from real -world studies comparing rituximab biosimilar and reference use have focused predominantly on oncology indications. This is the first study to assess the utilization of the 3 US rituximab biosimilars vs the reference product. STUDY DESIGN: Comparative analysis. METHODS: Deidentified real -world data of rituximab, rituximab-abbs, rituximab-pvvr, and rituximab-arrx dispensations between December 31, 2018, and February 1, 2022, were extracted using Trisus Medication Compare (The Craneware Group). The primary outcome was rituximab reference vs biosimilar utilization for oncology vs nononcology indications. Results were stratified by on -label and off -label use and treatment settings. RESULTS: A total of 28,025 encounters were captured for rituximab and its biosimilars across 193 facilities (rituximab: n = 23,395; biosimilars, n = 4631 [rituximab-abbs: n = 2550; rituximab-pvvr, n = 2081; rituximab-arrx: n = 0]). Rituximab reference had higher dispensations for oncology (78.4%) and nononcology (88.3%) indications than its biosimilars (21.6% and 11.7%, respectively; P < .01). The 3 -year annual trends from 2019 to 2021 revealed decreased rituximab reference utilization (99.99% to 40.1%) and increased biosimilar use (0.01% to 59.9%). Most oncology dispensations were on label (94.5%), whereas most nononcology dispensations were off label (73.6%; P < .01). A higher proportion of biosimilar use was attributed to on -label indications (67.7%; off -label, 32.2%) compared with rituximab reference (58.0% vs 42.0%, respectively; P < .01). Nonacademic settings showed higher biosimilar adoption than academic settings (22.2% vs 10.3%, respectively; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Real -world evidence shows an increase in rituximab biosimilar adoption over time, with higher adoption for oncology vs nononcology indications and in nonacademic settings.
引用
收藏
页码:E353 / E356
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rituximab utilization for approved and off-label nononcology indications and patients' experiences with the Patient Alert Card
    Sarsour, Khaled
    Beckley-Kartey, Senam
    Melega, Simone
    Odueyungbo, Adefowope
    Kirchner, Petra
    Khalife, Natasha
    Bangs, Joanne
    PHARMACOLOGY RESEARCH & PERSPECTIVES, 2020, 8 (01):
  • [2] CLL/NHL - patient registry OncoReg (Rituximab original vs. biosimilar)
    Linde, H.
    Spohn, C.
    Rubanov, O.
    Innig, G.
    Mueller-Hagen, S.
    Petersen, V.
    Goettel, R.
    Nusch, A.
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2019, 42 : 221 - 222
  • [3] REAL-WORLD UTILIZATION PATTERNS OF ONCOLOGY BIOSIMILAR MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES AND THEIR CORRESPONDING REFERENCE PRODUCTS
    Yang, J.
    Thompson, J.
    Maculaitis, M. C.
    Alvir, J. M.
    Shelbaya, A.
    Kelton, J. M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S499 - S500
  • [4] Developing and paying for medicines for orphan indications in oncology: utilitarian regulation vs equitable care?
    J E Davies
    S Neidle
    D G Taylor
    British Journal of Cancer, 2012, 106 : 14 - 17
  • [5] Developing and paying for medicines for orphan indications in oncology: utilitarian regulation vs equitable care?
    Davies, J. E.
    Neidle, S.
    Taylor, D. G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 106 (01) : 14 - 17
  • [6] COST MINIMIZATION ANALYSIS OF RITUXIMAB BIOSIMILAR VERSUS REFERENCE RITUXIMAB IN THE TREATMENT OF FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA
    Gironella, M.
    Gallardo-Escudero, J.
    Gomez-Barrera, M.
    Jarque, I
    Becares Martinez, F. J.
    Poveda, J. L.
    Martinez-Sesmero, J. M.
    Oyaguez, I
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2019, 104 : 93 - 93
  • [7] CATALOGING VS REFERENCE
    DONOGHUE, SJ
    LIBRARY JOURNAL, 1981, 106 (03) : 280 - 280
  • [8] Biosimilar Ranibizumab (SB11) vs Reference Ranibizumab-Diving Deeper for Safety and Efficacy
    Sharma, Ashish
    Kumar, Nilesh
    Parachuri, Nikulaa
    JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 139 (06) : 677 - 678
  • [9] Biosimilar vs biological agents in rheumatology: When are biosimilar agents similar enough?
    Lie, G.
    Sciascia, S.
    Cuadrado, M. J.
    INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 27 (02) : 220 - 223
  • [10] Comment on: 'Developing and paying for medicines for orphan indications in oncology: utilitarian regulation vs equitable care?'
    Bielack, S. S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 107 (03) : 583 - 583