Quantum dynamical decoupling by shaking the close environment

被引:1
|
作者
Burgelman, Michiel [1 ,2 ]
Forni, Paolo [1 ,3 ]
Sarlette, Alain [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ PSL, Sorbonne Univ, Lab Phys Ecole Normale Super, Inria,Mines Paris PSL,ENS PSL,CNRS, Paris, France
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Dept Phys & Astron, 6127 Wilder Lab, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[3] Cambridge Mechatron Ltd, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Ghent, Dept Elect & Informat Syst, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Compilation and indexing terms; Copyright 2025 Elsevier Inc;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfranklin.2022.08.011
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Quantum dynamical decoupling is a procedure to cancel the effective coupling between two systems by applying sequences of fast actuations, under which the coupling Hamiltonian averages out to leading order(s). One of its prominent uses is to drive a target system in such a way as to decouple it from a less protected one. The present manuscript investigates the dual strategy: acting on a noisy "environment" subsystem, such as to decouple it from a target system. The target system only has a Hamiltonian coupling to this close environment which itself undergoes Lindbladian decoherence. The potential advantages are that actions on the environment commute with system operations, and that imprecisions in the decoupling actuation are harmless to the target. We consider two versions of environment-side decoupling: adding an imprecise Hamiltonian drive which stirs the environment components; and, increasing the decoherence rates on the environment. The latter can be viewed as driving the environment with pure noise and our conclusions establish how, maybe counterintuitively, isolating the environment from noise sources as much as possible is often not the best option. In this setting, we can explicitly analyze the induced decoherence on the target system, and focusing on the example of a two-level environment subsystem, we establish how the induced decoherence is influenced by the parameters in both cases. The analysis combines Lindbladian derivation, adiabatic elimination, and Floquet modeling in a way that may be of independent interest. (c) 2022 The Franklin Institute. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:14022 / 14074
页数:53
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Decoherence control via quantum dynamical decoupling
    Lidar, Daniel A.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 241
  • [22] Dynamical decoupling-assisted quantum parameter estimation with initial system-environment correlations
    Ji, Yinghua
    Hu, Juju
    OPTIK, 2021, 227
  • [23] Dynamical decoupling with initial system-environment correlations
    Hu, Juju
    Ke, Qiang
    Ji, Yinghua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS B, 2021, 35 (05):
  • [24] Universal dynamical decoupling of multiqubit states from environment
    Jiang, Liang
    Imambekov, Adilet
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2011, 84 (06):
  • [25] Measuring the environment of a Cs qubit with dynamical decoupling sequences
    Burgardt, S.
    Jaeger, S. B.
    Fess, J.
    Hiebel, S.
    Schneider, I
    Widera, A.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS B-ATOMIC MOLECULAR AND OPTICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 56 (16)
  • [26] Dynamical decoupling pulses on the quantum correlations for the system of superconducting quantum circuit
    王冬梅
    钱懿
    许晶波
    俞攸红
    Chinese Physics B, 2015, 24 (11) : 102 - 106
  • [27] High Fidelity Quantum Gates via Dynamical Decoupling
    West, Jacob R.
    Lidar, Daniel A.
    Fong, Bryan H.
    Gyure, Mark F.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2010, 105 (23)
  • [28] Dynamical decoupling in quantum control: A system theoretic approach
    Ticozzi, Francesco
    Ferrante, Augusto
    SYSTEMS & CONTROL LETTERS, 2006, 55 (07) : 578 - 584
  • [29] Dynamical decoupling pulses on the quantum correlations for the system of superconducting quantum circuit
    Wang Dong-Mei
    Qian Yi
    Xu Jing-Bo
    Yu You-Hong
    CHINESE PHYSICS B, 2015, 24 (11)
  • [30] Optimally combining dynamical decoupling and quantum error correction
    Gerardo A. Paz-Silva
    D. A. Lidar
    Scientific Reports, 3