Optimization of machine learning approaches for shale gas production forecast

被引:9
|
作者
Wang, Muming [1 ]
Hui, Gang [1 ]
Pang, Yu [1 ]
Wang, Shuhua [1 ]
Chen, Shengnan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Chem & Petr Engn, Calgary, AB, Canada
来源
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Shale gas production; Machine learning; Model optimization; Overfitting; Sparrow search algorithm;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211719
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Successful production from shale gas formations has changed the energy outlook of North America. During such process, a significant amount of data related to production and operations has been accumulated, which can be analyzed with machine learning (ML) techniques for production forecasts and performance optimization. In this study, an optimization workflow is proposed for production forecast in shale gas reservoirs, focusing on mitigating the overfitting problem while maximizing its accuracy. More specifically, a new objective function is developed where a penalty term is added to mitigate the model's overfitting tendency. The kernel density estimate (KDE) method guarantees that a similar distribution is shared between the split training and testing subsets. Four machine learning algorithms, including XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and Random Forest, are utilized and further optimized by the sparrow search algorithm with the newly developed objective function. A stacking approach is finally established based on the optimized algorithm and selected meta-models. Results show that the R2 of all four models has increased to around 0.9 after the optimization process, where XGBoost and LightGBM perform slightly better than the rest. In addition, R2 of the training dataset for XGBoost was decreased from 0.999 to 0.937, while the R2 for the testing dataset was increased from 0.762 to 0.905. This indicates that the overfitting has been mitigated after the optimization with the gap between the training and testing datasets reduced from 0.237 to 0.032. Moreover, stacking the optimized ML algorithms can not further enhance its accuracy. The best performer with SVM as the meta-model can only increase the R2 to 0.910, yet the model complexity increases significantly.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Combining Decline-Curve Analysis and Geostatistics To Forecast Gas Production in the Marcellus Shale
    Xi, Zhenke
    Morgan, Eugene
    SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 2019, 22 (04) : 1562 - 1574
  • [32] Production forecast of a multistage fractured horizontal well by an analytical method in shale gas reservoir
    Li, Yongming
    You, Xianyong
    Zhao, Jinzhou
    Jiang, Youshi
    Pu, Xuan
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2019, 78 (09)
  • [33] Machine learning approaches to modeling and optimization of biodiesel production systems: State of art and future outlook
    Ishola, Niyi B.
    Epelle, Emmanuel I.
    Betiku, Eriola
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT-X, 2024, 23
  • [34] Current forecast of COVID-19 in Mexico: A Bayesian and machine learning approaches
    Prieto, Kernel
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (01):
  • [35] Application of Machine Learning for Shale Oil and Gas "Sweet Spots" Prediction
    Wang, Hongjun
    Guo, Zekun
    Kong, Xiangwen
    Zhang, Xinshun
    Wang, Ping
    Shan, Yunpeng
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (09)
  • [36] Dynamic Prediction of Shale Gas Drilling Costs Based on Machine Learning
    Yang, Tianxiang
    Liang, Yuan
    Wang, Zhong
    Ji, Qingyun
    Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 2024, 14 (23):
  • [37] Estimation of shale adsorption gas content based on machine learning algorithms
    Chen, Yang
    Tang, Shuheng
    Xi, Zhaodong
    Sun, Shasha
    Zhao, Ning
    Tang, Hongming
    Zhao, Shengxian
    GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 127
  • [38] Gas well production optimization: Classifying liquid loading severity in shale gas wells using semi-supervised learning
    Chen, Peng
    Chen, Yan
    Yang, Chunyi
    Xu, Yibo
    Feng, Gaocheng
    GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 128
  • [39] Optimization and Selection of Reforming Approaches for Syngas Generation from Natural/Shale Gas
    Noureldin, Mohamed M. B.
    Elbashir, Nimir O.
    El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M.
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2014, 53 (05) : 1841 - 1855
  • [40] A review of machine learning for the optimization of production processes
    Weichert, Dorina
    Link, Patrick
    Stoll, Anke
    Rüping, Stefan
    Ihlenfeldt, Steffen
    Wrobel, Stefan
    International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2019, 104 (5-8): : 1889 - 1902