Agricultural input subsidies, extension services, and farm labour productivity nexus: Evidence from maize farmers in Tanzania

被引:4
|
作者
Malimi, Kilugala [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Univ, Business Sch, Nottingham, England
关键词
agricultural extension services; agricultural input subsidy; crop yields; farm labour and land productivity; Tanzania; POVERTY REDUCTION; STRUCTURAL-CHANGE; MALAWI; IMPACT; GROWTH; PANEL; CONSUMPTION; ALLOCATION; WELFARE; AFRICA;
D O I
10.1111/1477-9552.12537
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
This paper examines the effect of agricultural input subsidies (AIS) and agricultural extension services (AES) on farm labour productivity in plots planted with maize in Tanzania, using panel data from the National Panel Survey in Tanzania. To control for the endogeneity of the two programmes, a control function and instrumental variable approach is used to estimate the effects of AIS and AES on farm labour productivity. The results show that AIS and AES are significant in raising labour productivity in maize-planted plots. Similarly, AIS and AES are also effective in increasing land productivity in these plots. Moreover, each programme has comparable effects on land productivity and farm labour productivity. These findings imply that public investments in AIS and AES are effective in raising farm productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:874 / 898
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machinery structure, machinery subsidies, and agricultural productivity: Evidence from China
    Meng, Meng
    Yu, Leng
    Yu, Xiaohua
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 55 (02) : 223 - 246
  • [22] Trade, farmers' heterogeneity, and agricultural productivity: Evidence from Colombia
    Gafaro, Margarita
    Pellegrina, Heitor S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 137
  • [23] THE EFFECTS OF AGRICULTURAL SUBSIDIES ON SUNFLOWER CULTIVATION AND FARMERS' INCOME: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY
    Semerci, Arif
    [J]. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2013, 50 (01): : 139 - 145
  • [24] Determinants of microregional agricultural labour productivity - Evidence from Czechia
    Zenka, Jan
    Slach, Ondrej
    Krticka, Ludek
    Zufan, Petr
    [J]. APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 71 : 83 - 94
  • [25] FARMERS' EDUCATION AND FARM PRODUCTIVITY. EVIDENCE FROM DENMARK AND FROM ROMANIA
    Fintineru, Gina
    Madsen, Ove
    [J]. AGROLIFE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL, 2013, 2 (01): : 175 - 180
  • [26] Smartphone-based agricultural extension services and farm incomes: Evidence from Zhejiang Province in China
    Zhuo, Ni
    Li, Baozhi
    Zhu, Qibiao
    Ji, Chen
    [J]. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2023, 27 (03) : 1383 - 1402
  • [27] Do Campaign Contributions from Farmers Influence Agricultural Policy? Evidence from a 2008 Farm Bill Amendment Vote to Curtail Cotton Subsidies
    Callahan, Scott
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (03) : 417 - 433
  • [28] Can the Application of Environmentally Friendly Fertilisers Reduce Agricultural Labour Input? Empirical Evidence from Peanut Farmers in China
    Wang, Ying
    Zhou, Shudong
    Jiang, Guanghui
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [29] Gender and agricultural Productivity: Econometric evidence from Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda
    Julien, Jacques C.
    Bravo-Ureta, Boris E.
    Rada, Nicholas E.
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 171
  • [30] Agricultural extension and farm entrepreneurship: evidence from small-scale farmers of high-density plantations in Kashmir
    Mushtaq, Ubaid
    Goswami, Kishor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION & EXTENSION, 2024,