Assessment of the crucial factors influencing the responses of ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions to controlled release nitrogen fertilizer: A meta-analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Lu, Hui-dan [1 ]
Wang, Xi-ya [1 ]
Pan, Zhao-long [1 ]
Zhao, Shi-cheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Resources & Reg Planning, Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Key Lab Plant Nutr & Fertilizer,State Key Lab Effi, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
controlled release urea; NH3; volatilization; N2O emission; environmental factor; management practice; SOIL CARBON STOCKS; USE EFFICIENCY; CROP YIELDS; WHEAT; UREA; RICE; RECOVERY; LOSSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jia.2023.07.008
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Reducing ammonia (NH3) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions have great effects on mitigating nitrogen (N) nutrient loss and greenhouse gas emissions. Controlled release urea (CRU) can control the N release rate, which reduces reactive N loss and increases nitrogen use efficiency relative to conventional urea (CU). However, the crucial factors influencing the responses of NH3 and N2O emissions to CRU relative to CU are still unclear. In this study, we evaluated the responses of NH3 and N2O emissions to CRU based on collected field data with a meta-analysis. CRU reduced the NH3 and N2O emissions by 32.7 and 25.0% compared with CU, respectively. According to subgroup analysis, CRU presented better mitigation of NH3 and N2O emissions in soils with pH 6.5-7.5 (-47.9 and -23.7%) relative to either pH<6.5 (-28.5 and -21.4%) or pH>7.5 (-29.3 and -17.3%), and in the rice season (-34.8 and -29.1%) relative to the wheat season (-19.8 and -22.8%). The responses of NH3 and N2O emissions to CRU increased from rainfed (-30.5 and -17.0%) to irrigated (-32.5 and -22.9%), and then to paddy (-34.8 and -29.1%) systems. In addition, the response of N2O emission mitigation increased with increases in soil total nitrogen (TN); however, soil TN did not significantly affect the response of NH3 volatilization. The reduction in NH3 emission was greater in sandy-textured soil (-57.7%) relative to loam-textured (-32.9%) and clay-textured (-32.3%) soils, whereas soil texture did not affect N2O emission. Overall, CRU was a good option for reducing the NH3 and N2O emissions relative to CU in agricultural production. This analysis improves our understanding of the crucial environmental and management factors influencing the mitigation of NH3 and N2O emissions under CRU application, and these site-specific factors should be considered when applying CRU to reduce reactive N loss and increase NUE.
引用
收藏
页码:3549 / 3559
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Crop Yield and Nitrous Oxide Emissions following Swine Manure Application: A Meta-Analysis
    Luo, Weiquan
    O'Brien, Peter L.
    Hatfield, Jerry L.
    AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL LETTERS, 2019, 4 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [32] A review and meta-analysis of mitigation measures for nitrous oxide emissions from crop residues
    Abalos, Diego
    Recous, Sylvie
    Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus
    De Notaris, Chiara
    Rittl, Tatiana F.
    Topp, Cairistiona F. E.
    Petersen, Soren O.
    Hansen, Sissel
    Bleken, Marina A.
    Rees, Robert M.
    Olesen, Jorgen E.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 828
  • [33] Mitigation of nitrous oxide emissions in grazing systems through nitrification inhibitors: a meta-analysis
    Johnny R. Soares
    Bruna R. Souza
    André M. Mazzetto
    Marcelo V. Galdos
    Dave R. Chadwick
    Eleanor E. Campbell
    Deepak Jaiswal
    Julianne C. Oliveira
    Leonardo A. Monteiro
    Murilo S. Vianna
    Rubens A. C. Lamparelli
    Gleyce K. D. A. Figueiredo
    John J. Sheehan
    Lee R. Lynd
    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2023, 125 : 359 - 377
  • [34] Biochar's role in mitigating soil nitrous oxide emissions: A review and meta-analysis
    Cayuela, M. L.
    van Zwieten, L.
    Singh, B. P.
    Jeffery, S.
    Roig, A.
    Sanchez-Monedero, M. A.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 191 : 5 - 16
  • [35] Mitigation of nitrous oxide emissions in grazing systems through nitrification inhibitors: a meta-analysis
    Soares, Johnny R.
    Souza, Bruna R.
    Mazzetto, Andre M.
    Galdos, Marcelo V.
    Chadwick, Dave R.
    Campbell, Eleanor E.
    Jaiswal, Deepak
    Oliveira, Julianne C.
    Monteiro, Leonardo A.
    Vianna, Murilo S.
    Lamparelli, Rubens A. C.
    Figueiredo, Gleyce K. D. A.
    Sheehan, John J.
    Lynd, Lee R.
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2023, 125 (03) : 359 - 377
  • [36] Methane and nitrous oxide emissions under no-till farming in China: a meta-analysis
    Zhao, Xin
    Liu, Sheng-Li
    Pu, Chao
    Zhang, Xiang-Qian
    Xue, Jian-Fu
    Zhang, Ran
    Wang, Yu-Qiao
    Lal, Rattan
    Zhang, Hai-Lin
    Chen, Fu
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2016, 22 (04) : 1372 - 1384
  • [37] Effect of Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers on Nitrous Oxide Emissions and Crop Yields: A Meta-analysis
    Thapa, Resham
    Chatterjee, Amitava
    Awale, Rakesh
    McGranahan, Devan A.
    Daigh, Aaron
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2016, 80 (05) : 1121 - 1134
  • [38] Substituting readily available nitrogen fertilizer with controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer improves crop yield and nitrogen uptake while mitigating environmental risks: A global meta-analysis
    Zhang, Yajun
    Ren, Weichen
    Zhu, Kuanyu
    Fu, Jiangyao
    Wang, Weilu
    Wang, Zhiqin
    Gu, Junfei
    Yang, Jianchang
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2024, 306
  • [39] Impact of nitrogen fertilizer, greenhouse, and crop species on yield-scaled nitrous oxide emission from vegetable crops: A meta-analysis
    Yang, Tong
    Li, Fengbo
    Zhou, Xiyue
    Xu, ChunChun
    Feng, Jinfei
    Fang, Fuping
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 105 : 717 - 726
  • [40] Effects of controlled-release fertilizer on nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions during wheat-growing season: field and pot experiments
    Gao, Xuesong
    Deng, Ouping
    Ling, Jing
    Zeng, Min
    Lan, Ting
    PADDY AND WATER ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 16 (01) : 99 - 108