Utility of polygenic risk scores in UK cancer screening: a modelling analysis

被引:34
|
作者
Huntley, Catherine [1 ,2 ]
Torr, Bethany [1 ]
Sud, Amit [1 ,3 ]
Rowlands, Charlie F. [1 ]
Way, Rosalind [1 ]
Snape, Katie [4 ,5 ]
Hanson, Helen [1 ,5 ]
Swanton, Charles [6 ,7 ]
Broggio, John [2 ]
Lucassen, Anneke [8 ,9 ]
McCartney, Margaret [10 ]
Houlston, Richard S. [1 ,11 ]
Hingorani, Aroon D. [12 ,13 ,14 ,15 ]
Jones, Michael E. [1 ]
Turnbull, Clare [1 ,2 ,11 ,16 ]
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res, Div Genet & Epidemiol, London, England
[2] Natl Hlth Serv NHS England, Natl Canc Registrat & Anal Serv, London, England
[3] Royal Marsden Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Haemato Oncol Unit, Sutton, England
[4] St Georges Univ London, London, England
[5] St George Hosp, South West Thames Reg Genet Serv, London, England
[6] Francis Crick Inst, Canc Evolut & Genome Instabil Lab, London, England
[7] UCL, Canc Evolut & Genome Instabil Lab, Canc Inst, London, England
[8] Univ Oxford, Wellcome Ctr Human Genet, Oxford, England
[9] Univ Oxford, Ctr Personalised Med, Oxford, England
[10] Univ St Andrews, Sch Med, Populat & Behav Sci Div, St Andrews, Scotland
[11] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Canc Genet Unit, London, England
[12] UCL, British Heart Fdn Res Accelerator Ctr, London, England
[13] Hlth Data Res UK, London, England
[14] UCL, Natl Inst Hlth Res, Biomed Res Ctr, Fac Populat Hlth, London, England
[15] UCL, Inst Cardiovasc Sci, Fac Populat Hlth, London, England
[16] Inst Canc Res, Div Genet & Epidemiol, London SM2 5NG, England
来源
LANCET ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 24卷 / 06期
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
BREAST-CANCER; PERFORMANCE; OVARIAN;
D O I
10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00156-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background It is proposed that, through restriction to individuals delineated as high risk, polygenic risk scores (PRSs) might enable more efficient targeting of existing cancer screening programmes and enable extension into new age ranges and disease types. To address this proposition, we present an overview of the performance of PRS tools (ie, models and sets of single nucleotide polymorphisms) alongside harms and benefits of PRS-stratified cancer screening for eight example cancers (breast, prostate, colorectal, pancreas, ovary, kidney, lung, and testicular cancer).Methods For this modelling analysis, we used age-stratified cancer incidences for the UK population from the National Cancer Registration Dataset (2016-18) and published estimates of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for current, future, and optimised PRS for each of the eight cancer types. For each of five PRS-defined high-risk quantiles (ie, the top 50%, 20%, 10%, 5%, and 1%) and according to each of the three PRS tools (ie, current, future, and optimised) for the eight cancers, we calculated the relative proportion of cancers arising, the odds ratios of a cancer arising compared with the UK population average, and the lifetime cancer risk. We examined maximal attainable rates of cancer detection by age stratum from combining PRS-based stratification with cancer screening tools and modelled the maximal impact on cancer-specific survival of hypothetical new UK programmes of PRS-stratified screening.Findings The PRS-defined high-risk quintile (20%) of the population was estimated to capture 37% of breast cancer cases, 46% of prostate cancer cases, 34% of colorectal cancer cases, 29% of pancreatic cancer cases, 26% of ovarian cancer cases, 22% of renal cancer cases, 26% of lung cancer cases, and 47% of testicular cancer cases. Extending UK screening programmes to a PRS-defined high-risk quintile including people aged 40-49 years for breast cancer, 50-59 years for colorectal cancer, and 60-69 years for prostate cancer has the potential to avert, respectively, a maximum of 102, 188, and 158 deaths annually. Unstratified screening of the full population aged 48-49 years for breast cancer, 58-59 years for colorectal cancer, and 68-69 years for prostate cancer would use equivalent resources and avert, respectively, an estimated maximum of 80, 155, and 95 deaths annually. These maximal modelled numbers will be substantially attenuated by incomplete population uptake of PRS profiling and cancer screening, interval cancers, non-European ancestry, and other factors.Interpretation Under favourable assumptions, our modelling suggests modest potential efficiency gain in cancer case detection and deaths averted for hypothetical new PRS-stratified screening programmes for breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer. Restriction of screening to high-risk quantiles means many or most incident cancers will arise in those assigned as being low-risk. To quantify real-world clinical impact, costs, and harms, UK-specific cluster-randomised trials are required.Funding The Wellcome Trust.Copyright & COPY; 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
引用
收藏
页码:658 / 668
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Improving the Utility of Polygenic Risk Scores as a Biomarker for Alzheimer's Disease
    Vlachakis, Dimitrios
    Papakonstantinou, Eleni
    Sagar, Ram
    Bacopoulou, Flora
    Exarchos, Themis
    Kourouthanassis, Panos
    Karyotis, Vasileios
    Vlamos, Panayiotis
    Lyketsos, Constantine
    Avramopoulos, Dimitrios
    Mahairaki, Vasiliki
    CELLS, 2021, 10 (07)
  • [42] Polygenic risk scores
    Watson, Roger
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2019, 75 (08) : 1606 - 1607
  • [43] Polygenic risk scores
    Brown, Matthew A.
    SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2024, 64
  • [44] Clinical utility of genomic analyses and polygenic risk scores for aortic diseases
    Gellatly, Corry
    Bown, Matthew J.
    NATURE CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH, 2022, 1 (06): : 542 - 543
  • [45] Clinical utility of genomic analyses and polygenic risk scores for aortic diseases
    Corry Gellatly
    Matthew J. Bown
    Nature Cardiovascular Research, 2022, 1 : 542 - 543
  • [46] Assessing thyroid cancer risk using polygenic risk scores
    Liyanarachchi, Sandya
    Gudmundsson, Julius
    Ferkingstad, Egil
    He, Huiling
    Jonasson, Jon G.
    Tragante, Vinicius
    Asselbergs, Folkert W.
    Xu, Li
    Kiemeney, Lambertus A.
    Netea-Maier, Romana T.
    Mayordomo, Jose I.
    Plantinga, Theo S.
    Hjartarson, Hannes
    Hrafnkelsson, Jon
    Sturgis, Erich M.
    Brock, Pamela
    Nabhan, Fadi
    Thorleifsson, Gudmar
    Ringel, Matthew D.
    Stefansson, Kari
    de la Chapelle, Albert
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (11) : 5997 - 6002
  • [47] Assessing agreement between different polygenic risk scores in the UK Biobank
    Clifton, Lei
    Collister, Jennifer A.
    Liu, Xiaonan
    Littlejohns, Thomas J.
    Hunter, David J.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [48] Assessing agreement between different polygenic risk scores in the UK Biobank
    Lei Clifton
    Jennifer A. Collister
    Xiaonan Liu
    Thomas J. Littlejohns
    David J. Hunter
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [49] Polygenic risk scores in cardiovascular risk prediction: A cohort study and modelling analyses
    Sun, Luanluan
    Pennells, Lisa
    Kaptoge, Stephen
    Nelson, Christopher P.
    Ritchie, Scott C.
    Abraham, Gad
    Arnold, Matthew
    Bell, Steven
    Bolton, Thomas
    Burgess, Stephen
    Dudbridge, Frank
    Guo, Qi
    Sofianopoulou, Eleni
    Stevens, David
    Thompson, John R.
    Butterworth, Adam S.
    Wood, Angela
    Danesh, John
    Samani, Nilesh J.
    Inouye, Michael
    Di Angelantonio, Emanuele
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2021, 18 (01)
  • [50] Refining colorectal cancer screening strategies using polygenic risk scores and classical risk factors: A proof-of-concept study in the UK Biobank cohort.
    Kim, Elle
    Chatterjee, Nilanjan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 43 (4_SUPPL)