Dexamethasone-sparing regimens with NEPA (netupitant/palonosetron) for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in older patients (> 65 years) fit for cisplatin: A sub-analysis from a phase 3 study

被引:1
|
作者
Celio, Luigi [1 ,4 ]
Bartsch, Rupert [2 ]
Aapro, Matti [3 ]
机构
[1] Azienda Socio Sanit Territoriale Garda, Med Oncol Unit, Desenzano Del Garda, Italy
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Med 1, Div Oncol, Vienna, Austria
[3] Clin Genolier, Canc Ctr, Genolier, Switzerland
[4] Desenzano del Garda Hosp, Med Oncol Unit, Local Montecroce 1, I-25015 Desenzano Del Garda, BS, Italy
关键词
Dexamethasone; Netupitant; Palonosetron; Cisplatin; CINV; Older patients; Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist; Highly emetogenic chemotherapy; ANTIEMETIC DEXAMETHASONE; ADULTS; PALONOSETRON; POLYPHARMACY; COMBINATION; NETUPITANT; EFFICACY; THERAPY; EMESIS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101537
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: We recently demonstrated the non-inferiority of two dexamethasone (DEX)-sparing regimens with an oral fixed-combination of netupitant and palonosetron (NEPA) versus the guideline-recommended DEX use for cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. Since prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is critical in older patients, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of the DEX-sparing regimens in this subset.Materials and Methods: Chemo-naive patients aged >65 years treated with high-dose cisplatin (& GE;70 mg/m2) were eligible. Patients received NEPA and DEX on day 1 and were randomized to receive either (1) no further DEX (DEX1), (2) oral low-dose DEX (4 mg) on days 2-3 (DEX3), or (3) the guideline-recommended standard DEX (4 mg twice daily) on days 2-4 (DEX4). The primary efficacy endpoint of the parent study was complete response (CR; no vomiting and no use of rescue medication) during the overall phase (days 1-5). No significant nausea (NSN; none or mild nausea) and the proportion of patients reporting no impact on daily life (NIDL) which was evaluated by the Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaire on day 6 (overall combined score > 108), were secondary endpoints.Results: Among the 228 patients in the parent study, 107 were > 65 years. Similar CR rates [95% confidence intervals (CI)] were observed in patients over 65 years across treatment groups [DEX1: 75% (59.7-86.8%); DEX3: 80.6% (62.5-92.6%); DEX4: 75% (56.6-88.5%)] as well as versus the total study population. NSN rates were also similar in the older-patients across treatment groups (p = 0.480) but were higher compared with the total population. Similar rates of NIDL (95% CI) were reported in the older-patient subset across treatment groups [DEX1: 61.5% (44.6-76.6%); DEX3: 64.3% (44.1-81.4%); DEX4: 62.1% (42.3-79.3%); p = 1.0] during the overall phase, as well as versus total population. A similar proportion of older patients across treatment groups experienced DEX-related side effects.Discussion: This analysis shows that older-patients who are fit for cisplatin benefit from a simplified regimen of NEPA plus single-dose DEX with neither loss in antiemetic efficacy nor the adverse impact on patient daily functioning.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A phase II trial of olanzapine, dexamethasone, and palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a Hoosier oncology group study
    Rudolph M. Navari
    Lawrence H. Einhorn
    Patrick J. Loehrer
    Steven D. Passik
    Jake Vinson
    John McClean
    Naveed Chowhan
    Nasser H. Hanna
    Cynthia S. Johnson
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2007, 15
  • [22] Cost-effectiveness analysis of NEPA, a fixed-dose combination of netupitant and palonosetron, for the prevention of highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: an international perspective
    Nilsson, Jonas
    Piovesana, Vittoria
    Turini, Marco
    Lezzi, Claudio
    Eriksson, Jennifer
    Aapro, Matti
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (11) : 9307 - 9315
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness analysis of NEPA, a fixed-dose combination of netupitant and palonosetron, for the prevention of highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: an international perspective
    Jonas Nilsson
    Vittoria Piovesana
    Marco Turini
    Claudio Lezzi
    Jennifer Eriksson
    Matti Aapro
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 9307 - 9315
  • [24] Palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in glioblastoma patients treated with temozolomide: a phase II study
    Antonio Rozzi
    Chiara Nardoni
    Michela Corona
    Maria Rosa Restuccia
    Alessandra Fabi
    Emilio Bria
    Giuseppe Minniti
    Gaetano Lanzetta
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2011, 19 : 697 - 701
  • [25] A phase II trial of olanzapine, dexamethasone, and palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a Hoosier oncology group study
    Navari, Rudolph M.
    Einhorn, Lawrence H.
    Loehrer, Patrick J., Sr.
    Passik, Steven D.
    Vinson, Jake
    McClean, John
    Chowhan, Naveed
    Hanna, Nasser H.
    Johnson, Cynthia S.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2007, 15 (11) : 1285 - 1291
  • [26] Palonosetron plus dexamethasone for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple-day cisplatin chemotherapy for germ cell cancer
    Lawrence H. Einhorn
    Mary J. Brames
    Robert Dreicer
    Craig R. Nichols
    Michael T. Cullen
    Joseph Bubalo
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2007, 15 : 1293 - 1300
  • [27] Palonosetron plus dexamethasone for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple-day cisplatin chemotherapy for germ cell cancer
    Einhorn, Lawrence H.
    Brames, Mary J.
    Dreicer, Robert
    Nichols, Craig R.
    Cullen, Michael T., Jr.
    Bubalo, Joseph
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2007, 15 (11) : 1293 - 1300
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of NEPA, an oral combination of netupitant and palonosetron, for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a randomized dose-ranging pivotal study
    Hesketh, P. J.
    Rossi, G.
    Rizzi, G.
    Palmas, M.
    Alyasova, A.
    Bondarenko, I.
    Lisyanskaya, A.
    Gralla, R. J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25 (07) : 1340 - 1346
  • [29] Improving the functional status of patients with cancer by more effectively preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): results of a phase 3 study of NEPA (fixed-dose combination of netupitant and palonosetron)
    Jahn, P.
    Jordan, K.
    Rizzi, G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2014, 18 : S20 - S21
  • [30] Phase III study of NEPA, a fixed-dose combination of netupitant (NETU) and palonosetron (PALO), versus PALO for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC).
    Aapro, Matti S.
    Rossi, Giorgia
    Rizzi, Giada
    Palmas, Marco
    Grunberg, Steven
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (18)