Quantifying Prediction Uncertainty in Regression Using Random Fuzzy Sets: The ENNreg Model

被引:17
|
作者
Denoeux, Thierry [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ technol Compiegne, Heudiasyc Lab, CNRS, F-60203 Compiegne, France
[2] Inst Univ France, F-75005 Paris, France
关键词
Belief functions; Dempster-Shafer theory; evidence theory; machine learning; neural networks; BELIEF FUNCTIONS;
D O I
10.1109/TFUZZ.2023.3268200
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this article, we introduce a neural network model for regression in which prediction uncertainty is quantified by Gaussian random fuzzy numbers (GRFNs), a newly introduced family of random fuzzy subsets of the real line that generalizes both Gaussian random variables and Gaussian possibility distributions. The output GRFN is constructed by combining GRFNs induced by prototypes using a combination operator that generalizes Dempster's rule of evidence theory. The three output units indicate the most plausible value of the response variable, variability around this value, and epistemic uncertainty. The network is trained by minimizing a loss function that generalizes the negative log-likelihood. Comparative experiments show that this method is competitive, both in terms of prediction accuracy and calibration error, with state-of-the-art techniques such as random forests or deep learning with Monte Carlo dropout. In addition, the model outputs a predictive belief function that can be shown to be calibrated, in the sense that it allows us to compute conservative prediction intervals with specified belief degree.
引用
收藏
页码:3690 / 3699
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uncertainty quantification in logistic regression using random fuzzy sets and belief functions
    Denoeux, Thierry
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2024, 368
  • [2] Uncertainty quantification in logistic regression using random fuzzy sets and belief functions
    Denœux, Thierry
    International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 1600, 168
  • [3] Uncertainty quantification in logistic regression using random fuzzy sets and belief functions
    Denoeux, Thierry
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2024, 168
  • [4] Comparing Fuzzy Sets and Random Sets to Model the Uncertainty of Fuzzy Shorelines
    Dewi, Ratna Sari
    Bijker, Wietske
    Stein, Alfred
    REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 9 (09):
  • [5] A Proposal of Robust Regression for Random Fuzzy Sets
    Ferraro, Maria Brigida
    Giordani, Paolo
    SYNERGIES OF SOFT COMPUTING AND STATISTICS FOR INTELLIGENT DATA ANALYSIS, 2013, 190 : 115 - 123
  • [6] Prediction of DNBR Using Fuzzy Support Vector Regression and Uncertainty Analysis
    Lee, Sim Won
    Kim, Dong Su
    Na, Man Gyun
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2010, 57 (03) : 1595 - 1601
  • [7] Formulation of Fuzzy Random Regression Model
    Watada, Junzo
    Wang, Shuming
    Pedrycz, Witold
    NEW ADVANCES IN INTELLIGENT SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2011, 372 : 1 - +
  • [8] Approximating Prediction Uncertainty for Random Forest Regression Models
    Coulston, John W.
    Blinn, Christine E.
    Thomas, Valerie A.
    Wynne, Randolph H.
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 82 (03): : 189 - 197
  • [9] Maximum-Minimum Temperature Prediction Using Fuzzy Random Auto-Regression Time Series Model
    Efendi, Riswan
    Samsudin, Noor Azah
    Arbaiy, Nureize
    Deris, Mustafa Mat
    2017 5TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL AND BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE (ISCBI), 2017, : 57 - 60
  • [10] Regression model based on fuzzy random variables
    Imai, Shinya
    Wang, Shuming
    Watada, Junzo
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED INTELLIGENT INFORMATION AND ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, PT 3, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5179 : 127 - 135