Analysis of main steam line break accident on a BWR test facility using TRACE

被引:1
|
作者
Yang, Ye [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Mengyan [2 ]
Zhang, Xueyan [2 ]
Yang, Jun [2 ]
机构
[1] Ningbo Univ Technol, Coll New Energy, Ningbo 315000, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Dept Nucl Engn & Technol, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
TRACE; RELAP5; MSLB; PUMA; -E; SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT; LOCA; MODEL; SIMULATIONS; REACTOR; CODES;
D O I
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2023.112765
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
PUMA-E is an integral test facility, which is used for extensive experimental investigations to study the behavior of Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) plants under accident conditions. The TRACE code is the best estimate thermal hydraulic system code developed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for performing nuclear power plant safety analysis. The aim of the present work is to conduct a short validation study of the TRACE code applied to the PUMA-E facility. Firstly, a TRACE model of the PUMA-E facility was developed based on the existing RELAP5 input deck. Then, an additional facility TRACE model with reactor pressure vessel modeled by three dimensional "VESSEL" component was also established. After that, a Main Steam Line Break accident test was simulated, and the calculation results were compared with experimental data and RELAP5 simulation results. The TRACE simulation capability to predict the accident phenomenon of BWR test facility was evaluated using both qualitative and quantitative methods. On the basis of the above research, the base case accompanying with one Gravity Driven Cooling System tank failure accident was carried out based on the three facility models. The validity and reliability of the simulation results of the different facility numerical models were mutually verified through a qualitative comparison of the simulation results.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] TRACE V5 CODE APPLICATION DVI LINE BREAK LOCA USING ATLAS FACILITY
    Veronese, Fabio
    Kozlowsk, Tomasz
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 44 (07) : 719 - 726
  • [42] Numerical analysis of thermal-hydraulic safety for a reactor containment in the event of a main steam line break
    Verma, Arun
    Dutta, Goutam
    Kumar, Mithilesh
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2023, 183
  • [43] Comparison of Working Fluid Models Used in the Analysis of Main Steam Line Break Accidents of Steam Generators in Nuclear Power Plants
    Jeon, Junho
    Choi, Yoonhwan
    Lee, Yeonwon
    RECENT ASIAN RESEARCH ON THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCES, AJWTF7 2018, 2020, : 701 - 708
  • [44] SIMILARITY STUDY OF LARGE STEAM LINE BREAK LOCAS IN ROSA-III, FIST AND BWR/6
    SUZUKI, M
    FINDLAY, JA
    TASAKA, K
    SUTHERLAND, WA
    NAKAMURA, H
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1986, 98 (01) : 39 - 55
  • [45] Modeling of NEK Main Steam Line Break in Computer code Apros 6
    Jazbinsek, Jure
    Polach, Tadeja
    Strubelj, Luka
    Basic, Ivica
    26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE NUCLEAR ENERGY FOR NEW EUROPE (NENE 2017), 2017,
  • [46] Vessel coolant mixing effects on a PWR Main Steam Line Break transient
    Zerkak, Omar
    Ferroukhi, Hakim
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2011, 38 (01) : 60 - 71
  • [47] The application study of conservative best-estimated approach for steam line break accident
    Ke, Xiao
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2024, 176
  • [48] PWR CORE THERMAL-HYDRAULIC RESPONSE DURING STEAM LINE BREAK ACCIDENT
    KERN, RC
    SIMONSON, SC
    NORIAN, PE
    SALAH, S
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1979, 32 (JUN): : 442 - 443
  • [49] Transient Thermal- Hydraulic Responses of the Nuclear Steam Generator Secondary Side to a Main Steam Line Break
    Jo, Jong Chull
    Moody, Frederick J.
    JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2015, 137 (04):
  • [50] TRANSIENT THERMAL-HYDRAULIC RESPONSES OF THE NUCLEAR STEAM GENERATOR SECONDARY SIDE TO A MAIN STEAM LINE BREAK
    Jo, Jong Chull
    Moody, Frederick J.
    ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE - 2014, VOL 4, 2014,