共 50 条
Reclamation and reuse of wastewater by membrane-based processes in a typical midstream petrochemical factory: a techno-economic analysis
被引:3
|作者:
Lin, Cheng-Wei
[1
]
Tran, Hai Nguyen
[2
,3
]
Juang, Ruey-Shin
[4
,5
,6
]
机构:
[1] China Petrochem Dev Corp, Taofen 35145, Miaoli, Taiwan
[2] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Fundamental & Appl Sci, Ho Chi Minh 700000, Vietnam
[3] Duy Tan Univ, Fac Environm & Chem Engn, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[4] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Chem & Mat Engn, 259 Wenhua First Rd, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
[5] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Nephrol, Linkou, Taiwan
[6] Ming Chi Univ Technol, Dept Safety Hlth & Environm Engn, New Taipei City 24301, Taiwan
关键词:
Electrodialysis reversal;
Midstream petrochemical factory;
Reverse osmosis;
Techno-economic analysis;
Ultrafiltration;
Wastewater reclamation;
D O I:
10.1007/s10668-022-02880-9
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
In the present study, a techno-economic analysis for the reclamation of wastewater in a midstream petrochemical factory (the Miaoli factory of the China Petrochemical Development Company in Taiwan) was investigated. Caprolactam is the main product in this factory. The wastewater to be reclaimed and recycled as cooling water replenishment was the effluent from organic- and inorganic-based wastewater treatment plants, the concentrate from cooling tower units, and water for rinsing use from other units. In addition to the current primary treatment process (Scheme 1), other treatment methods involving various combinations of membrane-based processes of microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), reverse osmosis (RO), and electrodialysis reversal (EDR) were proposed, depending on the quality of the wastewater. The three schemes include the combination of MF and EDR (Scheme 2), UF and RO (Scheme 3), and MF, UF and RO (Scheme 4). Based on the capacities and operating costs of various membrane modules, an economic analysis on Schemes 2-4 by the net present worth method demonstrated that Scheme 3 was the best choice under the range of source water price studied (U$ 0.45-0.62/m(3)). In this case, the total amount of wastewater reclaimed notably increased from 6.6% by the current treatment scheme (Scheme 1) to 30.9% by Schemes1 and 3. Moreover, Scheme 3 had an advantage over Scheme 1 when the source water price exceeds U$ 0.51/m(3).
引用
收藏
页码:5419 / 5430
页数:12
相关论文