Collaborative governance for aviation approved training organisation: an adapted model for multi-stakeholder collaboration

被引:1
|
作者
Hendra, Oke [1 ,2 ]
Kurnianto, Benny [2 ]
Endrawijaya, Ika [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Fac Adm Sci, Depok, Indonesia
[2] Politekn Penerbangan Indonesia Curug, Tangerang, Indonesia
关键词
Aviation human resource development; Collaborative governance; Link and match; University industry collaboration; Vocational education and training; HIGHER-EDUCATION; TRIPLE-HELIX; COMPETENCES; TRUST;
D O I
10.1108/HESWBL-06-2023-0164
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study aimed to develop an adapted collaborative governance model for aviation human resource development in Indonesia's approved training organisations (ATO), considering the expected changes in the industry due to advanced technologies. The model, based on Ansell and Gash's approach, emphasizes multi-stakeholder collaboration to ensure workforce development aligns with industry and regulatory standards and accommodates technological advancements.Design/methodology/approachQualitative methods, such as in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, were employed to collect and analyse data.FindingsThe results indicated that collaborative governance is a valuable tool for cultivating competent human resources and facilitating industry improvement in the face of rapid technological change.Originality/valueThe proposed model contributes significantly to the field by promoting inclusive and effective human resource development through the Centre for Aviation Human Resource Development (CAHRD), thereby preparing the Indonesian aviation industry for the impact of advanced technologies. Furthermore, this study contributes to the enhancement of Ansell and Gash's collaborative governance theoretical framework by effectively addressing its empirical gaps concerning vocational education and training challenges within Indonesia's air transportation sector.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 434
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MSPs for the SDGs-Assessing the collaborative governance architecture of multi-stakeholder partnerships for implementing the Sustainable Development Goals
    Glass, Lisa-Maria
    Newig, Jens
    Ruf, Simon
    [J]. EARTH SYSTEM GOVERNANCE, 2023, 17
  • [22] A multi-stakeholder collaboration model of dementia-friendly communities: Experiences from Nanjing, China
    Wang, Jing
    Zhao, Yayi
    Cui, Yan
    Ding, Yaping
    Xing, Ying
    Li, Xianwen
    [J]. GERIATRIC NURSING, 2024, 56 : 159 - 166
  • [23] A life cycle model of multi-stakeholder networks
    Roloff, Julia
    [J]. BUSINESS ETHICS-A EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2008, 17 (03) : 311 - 325
  • [24] Designing for technology acceptance in an ageing society through multi-stakeholder collaboration
    Jia, Pengxiang
    Lu, Yuan
    Wajda, Barbara
    [J]. 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS (AHFE 2015) AND THE AFFILIATED CONFERENCES, AHFE 2015, 2015, 3 : 3535 - 3542
  • [25] Multi-stakeholder collaboration in the redesign of family-centered rounds process
    Xie, Anping
    Carayon, Pascale
    Cartmill, Randi
    Li, Yaqiong
    Cox, Elizabeth D.
    Plotkin, Julie A.
    Kelly, Michelle M.
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2015, 46 : 115 - 123
  • [26] Multi-stakeholder collaboration for migrants' health: the experience of the Volgograd region of Russia
    Shkarin, V.
    Polushkin, V.
    Madyanova, V.
    Halfin, R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 28 : 134 - 134
  • [27] Fostering Multi-stakeholder Collaboration Through Co-production and Rewarding
    Lopez-de-Ipina, Diego
    Badiola, Julen
    Lauzurica, Daniel
    Silva, Daniel
    Carballedo, Roberto
    Casado-Mansilla, Diego
    Not, Elena
    Leonardi, Chiara
    Misikangas, Pauli
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING & AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE (UCAMI 2022), 2023, 594 : 559 - 564
  • [28] Economic Policies for Innovative Enterprises: Implementing Multi-Stakeholder Corporate Governance
    Palladino, Lenore
    [J]. REVIEW OF RADICAL POLITICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 54 (01) : 5 - 25
  • [29] From risk perception to risk governance in nanotechnology: a multi-stakeholder study
    Porcari, Andrea
    Borsella, Elisabetta
    Benighaus, Christina
    Grieger, Khara
    Isigonis, Panagiotis
    Chakravarty, Somik
    Kines, Pete
    Jensen, Keld Alstrup
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (11)
  • [30] Contestation in Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives: Enhancing the Democratic Quality of Transnational Governance
    Arenas, Daniel
    Albareda, Laura
    Goodman, Jennifer
    [J]. BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2020, 30 (02) : 169 - 199