Comparison between conventional MRI and weight-bearing positional MRI reveals important differences in radiological measurements of the patellofemoral joint

被引:2
|
作者
Hansen, Philip [1 ]
Harving, Mette [2 ]
ohlenschlaeger, Tommy [3 ]
Brinch, Signe [4 ]
Lavard, Peter [5 ]
Krogsgaard, Michael [5 ]
Boesen, Mikael [4 ]
机构
[1] Bispebjerg Frederiksberg Hosp, Musculoskeletal Imaging Res Unit, Dept Radiol, Nielsine Nielsens vej 41A, DK-2400 NV Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Rigshospitalet, Dept Radiol, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 NV Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Bispebjerg Frederiksberg Hosp, Inst Sports Med Copenhagen, IOC Res Ctr Copenhagen, Nielsine Nielsens vej 11, DK-2400 NV Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Bispebjerg Frederiksberg Hosp, Dept Radiol, Musculoskeletal Imaging Res Unit Copenhagen, Nielsine Nielsens vej 41A, DK-2400 NV Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Bispebjerg Frederiksberg Hosp, IOC Res Ctr Copenhagen, Sect Sports Traumatol M51, Nielsine Nielsens vej 3, DK-2400 NV Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Positional MRI; Weight bearing MRI; Patellofemoral joint; Reproducibility; TT-TG distance; TROCHLEAR GROOVE DISTANCE; PATELLAR HEIGHT; RELIABILITY; ALTA; INSTABILITY; MALTRACKING; CARTILAGE; ALIGNMENT; CT;
D O I
10.1007/s00256-023-04304-9
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To compare radiological measurements of the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) morphology and measurement reproducibility across the following scanning modalities: (a) 3 T supine MRI, (b) 0.25 T supine MRI and (c) standing 0.25 T MRI. Methods Forty patients referred to MRI of the knee were scanned by high field 3 T MRI in supine position and low field 0.25 T positional (pMRI) in supine and standing positions. Radiological measurements for assessment of femoral trochlear morphology, patellar tracking, patellar height and knee flexion angle were compared across scanning situations by one-way repeated-measures ANOVA. Measurement reliability and agreement were assessed by calculation of ICC, SEM and MDC. Results Patellar tracking differed across scanning situations, particularly between 3.0 T supine and 0.25 T standing position. Mean differences are the following: patella bisect offset (PBO): 9.6%, p <= 0.001; patellar tilt angle (PTA): 3.1 degrees, p <= 0.001; tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance (TT-TG): 2.7 mm, p <= 0.001). Measurements revealed slight knee joint flexion in supine and slight hyperextension in the standing position (MD: 9.3 degrees, P <= 0.001), likely related to the observed differences in patellar tracking. Reproducibility was comparable across MRI field strengths. In general, PBO, PTA and TT-TG were the most robust measurements in terms of reproducibility and agreement across scanning situations (ICC range: 0.85-0.94). Conclusion Significant differences in important patellofemoral morphology measurements were observed between supine and standing MRI scanning positions. These were unlikely due to physiological factors such as changes in joint loading but rather induced by slight differences in knee flexion angle. This emphasises the need to standardise knee positioning during scanning, particularly for weight-bearing positional MRI before clinical use.
引用
收藏
页码:1525 / 1534
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] Dynamic measurement of patello-femoral joint alignment using weight-bearing magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI)
    Mariani, Silvia
    La Marra, Alice
    Arrigoni, Francesco
    Necozione, Stefano
    Splendiani, Alessandra
    Di Cesare, Ernesto
    Barile, Antonio
    Masciocchi, Carlo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (12) : 2571 - 2578
  • [22] WEIGHT-BEARING MRI: COMPARISON OF KNEE ANGLE SET-UP METHODS AND THE EFFECT OF REAL-TIME VISUAL FEEDBACK
    Dubowsky, Sarah R.
    Allen, Jerome
    Gade, Venkata
    Barrance, Peter J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME SUMMER BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE - 2009, PT A AND B, 2009, : 617 - 618
  • [23] Comparison between 2D radiographic weight-bearing joint space width and 3D MRI non-weight-bearing cartilage thickness measures in the knee using non-weight-bearing 2D and 3D CT as an intermediary
    Jansen, Mylene P.
    Mastbergen, Simon C.
    Eckstein, Felix
    van Heerwaarden, Ronald J.
    Spruijt, Sander
    Lafeber, Floris P. J. G.
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN CHRONIC DISEASE, 2021, 12
  • [24] Flexible Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity Comparison Between Weight-Bearing and Non-Weight-Bearing Measurements Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
    Netto, Cesar de Cesar
    Schon, Lew C.
    Thawait, Gaurav K.
    da Fonseca, Lucas Furtado
    Chinanuvathana, Apisan
    Zbijewski, Wojciech B.
    Siewerdsen, Jeffrey H.
    Demehri, Shadpour
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 99 (18): : e98
  • [25] Discrepancies in long-leg alignment and knee joint line obliquity between two- and three-dimensional measurements under weight-bearing conditions: Effects on coronal plane alignment of the knee classification
    Sasaki, Ryo
    Niki, Yasuo
    Kaneda, Kazuya
    Yamada, Yoshitake
    Kobayashi, Shu
    Harato, Kengo
    Nagura, Takeo
    Nakamura, Masaya
    Jinzaki, Masahiro
    KNEE, 2025, 53 : 237 - 245
  • [26] Clinical Study Comparison of differences and random errors in pedicle diameter measurements between MRI and CT: observational study of 315 pedicles in Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients
    Hatakenaka, Terue
    Oba, Hiroki
    Ikegami, Shota
    Kuraishi, Shugo
    Uehara, Masashi
    Mimura, Tetsuhiko
    Takizawa, Takashi
    Munakata, Ryo
    Kamanaka, Takayuki
    Miyaoka, Yoshinari
    Koseki, Michihiko
    Takahashi, Jun
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (06): : 1002 - 1011