Prediction of single track clad quality in laser metal deposition using dissimilar materials: Comparison of machine learning-based approaches

被引:3
|
作者
Paulus, Pascal [1 ]
Ruppert, Yannick [2 ]
Vielhaber, Michael [1 ]
Griebsch, Juergen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saarland, Inst Engn Design, Campus E2 9, D-66123 Saarbrucken, Germany
[2] Univ Appl Sci Saarland, Sch Engn, Goebenstr 40, D-66117 Saarbrucken, Germany
关键词
Machine learning; Laser metal deposition; Prediction accuracy; REPAIR;
D O I
10.2351/7.0001108
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Powder-based laser metal deposition (LMD) offers a promising additive manufacturing process, given the large number of available materials for cladding or generative applications. In laser cladding of dissimilar materials, it is necessary to control the mixing of substrate and additive in the interaction zone to ensure safe metallurgical bonding while avoiding critical chemical compositions that lead to undesired phase precipitation. However, the generation of empirical data for LMD process development is very challenging and time-consuming. In this context, different machine learning models are examined to identify whether they can converge with a small amount of empirical data. In this work, the prediction accuracy of back propagation neural network (BPNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) was compared using mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). A hyperparameter optimization was performed for each model. The materials used are 316L as the substrate and VDM Alloy 780 as the additive. The dataset used consists of 40 empirically determined values. The input parameters are laser power, feed rate, and powder mass flow rate. The quality characteristics of height, width, dilution, Fe-amount, and seam contour are defined as outputs. As a result, the predictions were compared with retained validation data and described as MSE and MAPE to determine the prediction accuracy for the models. BPNN achieved a prediction accuracy of 0.0072 MSE and 4.37% MAPE and XGBoost of 0.0084 MSE and 6.34% MAPE. The most accurate prediction was achieved by LSTM with 0.0053 MSE and 3.75% MAPE.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prediction of the Amount of Sediment Deposition in Tarbela Reservoir Using Machine Learning Approaches
    Hassan, Shahzal
    Shaukat, Nadeem
    Ahmad, Ammar
    Abid, Muhammad
    Hashmi, Abrar
    Shahid, Muhammad Laiq Ur Rahman
    Rajabi, Zohreh
    Tariq, Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman
    WATER, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [32] A Quantitative Comparison of Different Machine Learning Approaches for Human Spermatozoa Quality Prediction Using Multimodal Datasets
    Feng, Ming
    Xu, Kele
    Wang, Yin
    MM '20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMEDIA, 2020, : 4659 - 4663
  • [33] EMPIRICAL COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF MACHINE LEARNING-BASED APPROACHES FOR DRUGGABLE PROTEIN IDENTIFICATION
    Shoombuatong, Watshara
    Schaduangrat, Nalini
    Nikom, Jaru
    EXCLI JOURNAL, 2023, 22 : 915 - 927
  • [34] Machine Learning-Based Fatigue Life Prediction of Functionally Graded Materials Using Material Extrusion Technology
    Alkunte, Suhas
    Fidan, Ismail
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES SCIENCE, 2023, 7 (10):
  • [35] Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Activation Energies for Chemical Reactions on Metal Surfaces
    Hutton, Daniel J.
    Cordes, Kari E.
    Michel, Carine
    Goltl, Florian
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2023, 63 (19) : 6006 - 6013
  • [36] Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Proton Conductivity in Metal-Organic Frameworks
    Han, Seunghee
    Lee, Byoung Gwan
    Lim, Dae-Woon
    Kim, Jihan
    CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS, 2024, 36 (22) : 11280 - 11287
  • [37] Electric Vehicle User Behavior Prediction using Learning-based Approaches
    Khan, Sara
    Brandherm, Boris
    Swamy, Anilkumar
    2020 IEEE ELECTRIC POWER AND ENERGY CONFERENCE (EPEC), 2020,
  • [38] A novel framework for addressing uncertainties in machine learning-based geospatial approaches for flood prediction
    Adnan, Mohammed Sarfaraz Gani
    Siam, Zakaria Shams
    Kabir, Irfat
    Kabir, Zobaidul
    Ahmed, M. Razu
    Hassan, Quazi K.
    Rahman, Rashedur M.
    Dewan, Ashraf
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 326
  • [39] Simulation-Based Machine Learning for Predicting Clad Layer Geometry in Laser Direct Energy Deposition
    Gholami, Ebrahim
    Batebi, Saeed
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE INDIAN INSTITUTE OF METALS, 2025, 78 (04)
  • [40] Machine learning-based ensemble model for groundwater quality prediction: A case study
    Jose, Annie
    Yasala, Srinivas
    WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 19 (06) : 2364 - 2375