Prediction of single track clad quality in laser metal deposition using dissimilar materials: Comparison of machine learning-based approaches

被引:3
|
作者
Paulus, Pascal [1 ]
Ruppert, Yannick [2 ]
Vielhaber, Michael [1 ]
Griebsch, Juergen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saarland, Inst Engn Design, Campus E2 9, D-66123 Saarbrucken, Germany
[2] Univ Appl Sci Saarland, Sch Engn, Goebenstr 40, D-66117 Saarbrucken, Germany
关键词
Machine learning; Laser metal deposition; Prediction accuracy; REPAIR;
D O I
10.2351/7.0001108
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Powder-based laser metal deposition (LMD) offers a promising additive manufacturing process, given the large number of available materials for cladding or generative applications. In laser cladding of dissimilar materials, it is necessary to control the mixing of substrate and additive in the interaction zone to ensure safe metallurgical bonding while avoiding critical chemical compositions that lead to undesired phase precipitation. However, the generation of empirical data for LMD process development is very challenging and time-consuming. In this context, different machine learning models are examined to identify whether they can converge with a small amount of empirical data. In this work, the prediction accuracy of back propagation neural network (BPNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) was compared using mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). A hyperparameter optimization was performed for each model. The materials used are 316L as the substrate and VDM Alloy 780 as the additive. The dataset used consists of 40 empirically determined values. The input parameters are laser power, feed rate, and powder mass flow rate. The quality characteristics of height, width, dilution, Fe-amount, and seam contour are defined as outputs. As a result, the predictions were compared with retained validation data and described as MSE and MAPE to determine the prediction accuracy for the models. BPNN achieved a prediction accuracy of 0.0072 MSE and 4.37% MAPE and XGBoost of 0.0084 MSE and 6.34% MAPE. The most accurate prediction was achieved by LSTM with 0.0053 MSE and 3.75% MAPE.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Machine learning-based approaches for cancer prediction using microbiome data
    Freitas, Pedro
    Silva, Francisco
    Sousa, Joana Vale
    Ferreira, Rui M.
    Figueiredo, Ceu
    Pereira, Tania
    Oliveira, Helder P.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [2] Machine learning-based approaches for cancer prediction using microbiome data
    Pedro Freitas
    Francisco Silva
    Joana Vale Sousa
    Rui M. Ferreira
    Céu Figueiredo
    Tania Pereira
    Hélder P. Oliveira
    Scientific Reports, 13 (1)
  • [3] Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Air Quality
    Liang, Yun-Chia
    Maimury, Yona
    Chen, Angela Hsiang-Ling
    Juarez, Josue Rodolfo Cuevas
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (24): : 1 - 17
  • [4] Machine learning-based approaches for disease gene prediction
    Duc-Hau Le
    BRIEFINGS IN FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS, 2020, 19 (5-6) : 350 - 363
  • [5] Machine Learning-based Approaches Comparison for Netflix/DAZN Streaming and Real Traffic Prediction
    Reticcioli, E.
    Di Girolamo, G. D.
    Di Carlo, C.
    Smarra, F.
    D'Innocenzo, A.
    2022 IEEE GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE (GLOBECOM 2022), 2022, : 3102 - 3107
  • [6] Machine learning based track height prediction for complex tool paths in direct metal deposition
    Knuttel, Daniel
    Baraldo, Stefano
    Valente, Anna
    Bleicher, Friedrich
    Wegener, Konrad
    Carpanzano, Emanuele
    CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 71 (01) : 193 - 196
  • [7] Prediction of melt pool height based on the spatiotemporal adjacency features in laser metal deposition using machine learning
    Imran, Muhammad Mu'az
    Kang, Jaewoong
    Kim, Young
    Jung, Gisun
    Park, Taeeun
    Idris, Azam Che
    Suh, Jeong-Hun
    De Silva, Liyanage Chandratilak
    Abas, Pg Emeroylariffion
    Kim, Yun Bae
    PROGRESS IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2025,
  • [8] A Machine Learning-based Approach for Prediction of Plant Protection Product Deposition
    Junior, Carlos R. G.
    Gomes, Pedro H.
    Mano, Leandro Y.
    de Oliveira, Rone B.
    de Carvalho, Andre C. P. de L. F.
    Faical, Bruno S.
    2017 6TH BRAZILIAN CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (BRACIS), 2017, : 234 - 239
  • [9] Machine Learning-Based A Comparative Analysis for Air Quality Prediction
    Utku, Anil
    Can, Umit
    2022 30TH SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE, SIU, 2022,
  • [10] Prediction of software quality with Machine Learning-Based ensemble methods
    Ceran A.A.
    Ar Y.
    Tanrıöver Ö.Ö.
    Seyrek Ceran S.
    Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023, 81 : 18 - 25