Carbon accounting without life cycle analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Lackner, Klaus S. [1 ]
Arcusa, Stephanie H. [2 ]
Azarabadi, Habib [3 ]
Sriramprasad, Vishrudh [1 ]
Page, Robert [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Ctr Negat Carbon Emiss, Sch Sustainable Engn & Built Environm, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Arizona Univ, Ctr Negat Carbon Emiss, Global Futures Lab, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Boston Consulting Grp Inc, CCUS & Carbon Removal, Boston, MA USA
关键词
CLIMATE-CHANGE MITIGATION; EVALUATING PROTOCOLS; UNRESOLVED PROBLEMS; TEMPORARY-STORAGE; OFFSET PROGRAMS; EMISSIONS; PART; VALIDATION; TRUNCATION; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1039/d3ee01138k
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Life cycle analysis (LCA) is deeply embedded in carbon accounting. LCA is valuable for qualitatively understanding technologies' environmental footprints. However, ambiguities and insatiable data requirements make it ill-suited for quantitative analysis. Fortunately, accounting without LCA is possible, for example, by demanding that for every ton of carbon coming out of the ground, another ton must be sequestered. This "Carbon Takeback Obligation" (CTBO) policy would eliminate the need for tracking carbon through supply chains. With all supply chains already carbon balanced, it is sufficient to quantify the amount of carbon sequestered without subtracting upstream emissions. Our modeling shows that once full carbon neutrality is demanded, market forces alone will eliminate counterproductive sequestration technologies, approaches that release more CO2 than they store. Complications arise during the transition where some carbon extraction is not yet balanced out by sequestration, as under some policies, counterproductive technologies could be introduced solely to game the system. We explore the economics of four transition pathways: a simple CTBO, a CTBO combined with permits required for all unbalanced carbon, a CTBO combined with a futures market, and permit-future hybrid schemes. A simple CTBO that does not add an economic burden on unmitigated carbon would incentivize low-cost, counterproductive technologies. Contrastingly, a CTBO policy that includes permits and/or futures will render such technologies uneconomical at any point in the transition. A policy with controlled futures would allow for rapid permit phaseout. Hybrid systems could lessen the initiation shock and bridge the transition time when market demand exceeds sequestration capacity. Carbon accounting without life cycle analysis (LCA) is possible by requiring one ton of sequestration for each extracted ton of carbon. A carbon takeback obligation eliminates the need to track carbon through the supply chain.
引用
收藏
页码:4968 / 4982
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A proposal for accounting for biodiversity in life cycle assessment
    Trent D. Penman
    Brad S. Law
    Fabiano Ximenes
    [J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2010, 19 : 3245 - 3254
  • [32] Full cost accounting for the life cycle of coal
    Epstein, Paul R.
    Buonocore, Jonathan J.
    Eckerle, Kevin
    Hendryx, Michael
    Stout, Benjamin M., III
    Heinberg, Richard
    Clapp, Richard W.
    May, Beverly
    Reinhart, Nancy L.
    Ahern, Melissa M.
    Doshi, Samir K.
    Glustrom, Leslie
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS REVIEWS, 2011, 1219 : 73 - 98
  • [33] Techno-economic-environmental analysis based on life cycle carbon accounting and pollutants audit for cleaner production of electrolytic manganese
    Wang, Ruichen
    Zhang, Shuli
    Guo, Yajing
    Liu, Jingyang
    Zhang, Feilong
    Dang, Chunge
    [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2024, 191 : 1010 - 1023
  • [34] The Life Cycle (Without Regression)
    Rizzolo, Gregory S.
    [J]. PSYCHOANALYTIC STUDY OF THE CHILD, VOL 72, 2019, 72 : 207 - 227
  • [35] Population aging and carbon emissions in OECD countries: Accounting for life-cycle and cohort effects
    Menz, Tobias
    Welsch, Heinz
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (03) : 842 - 849
  • [36] Rethinking the paper product carbon footprint accounting standard from a life-cycle perspective
    Liang, Ziyang
    Deng, Huijing
    Xie, Hongyi
    Chen, Bin
    Sun, Mingxing
    Wang, Yutao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 393
  • [37] Holistic life-cycle accounting of carbon emissions of prefabricated buildings using LCA and BIM
    Li, Xiao-juan
    Xie, Wan-jun
    Xu, Le
    Li, Lu-lu
    Jim, C.Y.
    Wei, Tai-bing
    [J]. Energy and Buildings, 2022, 266
  • [38] Holistic life-cycle accounting of carbon emissions of prefabricated buildings using LCA and BIM
    Li, Xiao-juan
    Xie, Wan-jun
    Xu, Le
    Li, Lu-lu
    Jim, C. Y.
    Wei, Tai-bing
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2022, 266
  • [39] Life cycle assessment of future fossil technologies with and without carbon capture and storage
    Dones, Roberto
    Bauer, Christian
    Heck, Thomas
    Mayer-Spohn, Oliver
    Blesl, Markus
    [J]. LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS FOR NEW ENERGY CONVERSION AND STORAGE SYSTEMS, 2008, 1041 : 147 - 158
  • [40] Life cycle analysis of power cycle configurations in bioenergy with carbon capture and storage
    Bennett, Jeffrey A.
    Melara, A. Jasmin
    Colosi, Lisa M.
    Clarens, Andres F.
    [J]. 26TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING (LCE), 2019, 80 : 340 - 345