Carbon accounting without life cycle analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Lackner, Klaus S. [1 ]
Arcusa, Stephanie H. [2 ]
Azarabadi, Habib [3 ]
Sriramprasad, Vishrudh [1 ]
Page, Robert [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Ctr Negat Carbon Emiss, Sch Sustainable Engn & Built Environm, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Arizona Univ, Ctr Negat Carbon Emiss, Global Futures Lab, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Boston Consulting Grp Inc, CCUS & Carbon Removal, Boston, MA USA
关键词
CLIMATE-CHANGE MITIGATION; EVALUATING PROTOCOLS; UNRESOLVED PROBLEMS; TEMPORARY-STORAGE; OFFSET PROGRAMS; EMISSIONS; PART; VALIDATION; TRUNCATION; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1039/d3ee01138k
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Life cycle analysis (LCA) is deeply embedded in carbon accounting. LCA is valuable for qualitatively understanding technologies' environmental footprints. However, ambiguities and insatiable data requirements make it ill-suited for quantitative analysis. Fortunately, accounting without LCA is possible, for example, by demanding that for every ton of carbon coming out of the ground, another ton must be sequestered. This "Carbon Takeback Obligation" (CTBO) policy would eliminate the need for tracking carbon through supply chains. With all supply chains already carbon balanced, it is sufficient to quantify the amount of carbon sequestered without subtracting upstream emissions. Our modeling shows that once full carbon neutrality is demanded, market forces alone will eliminate counterproductive sequestration technologies, approaches that release more CO2 than they store. Complications arise during the transition where some carbon extraction is not yet balanced out by sequestration, as under some policies, counterproductive technologies could be introduced solely to game the system. We explore the economics of four transition pathways: a simple CTBO, a CTBO combined with permits required for all unbalanced carbon, a CTBO combined with a futures market, and permit-future hybrid schemes. A simple CTBO that does not add an economic burden on unmitigated carbon would incentivize low-cost, counterproductive technologies. Contrastingly, a CTBO policy that includes permits and/or futures will render such technologies uneconomical at any point in the transition. A policy with controlled futures would allow for rapid permit phaseout. Hybrid systems could lessen the initiation shock and bridge the transition time when market demand exceeds sequestration capacity. Carbon accounting without life cycle analysis (LCA) is possible by requiring one ton of sequestration for each extracted ton of carbon. A carbon takeback obligation eliminates the need to track carbon through the supply chain.
引用
收藏
页码:4968 / 4982
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis on Influence Factors for the Whole Life-cycle Carbon Emissions of Highway and Carbon Accounting
    Jiao, Shuangjian
    Li, Longfei
    Li, Yanwei
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRY AND ECONOMY, PTS 1 AND 2, 2014, 869-870 : 826 - +
  • [2] Is constructed wetlands carbon source or carbon sink? Case analysis based on life cycle carbon emission accounting
    Wang, Shuo
    Li, Xiaokang
    Ji, Mingde
    Zhang, Jian
    Tanveer, Muhammad
    Hu, Zhen
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 388
  • [3] Carbon Accounting and Carbon Emission Reduction Potential Analysis of Sponge Cities Based on Life Cycle Assessment
    Zhao, Zhonghui
    Liu, Changqi
    Xie, Hao
    Li, Yang
    Zhu, Chong
    Liu, Meijing
    [J]. WATER, 2023, 15 (20)
  • [4] Carbon emission accounting for whole life cycle of sponge facilities
    Zhu, Yu
    Shao, Weiwei
    Yang, Zhiyong
    [J]. Water Resources Protection, 2023, 39 (06) : 32 - 38
  • [5] Exergy, waste accounting, and life-cycle analysis
    Ayres, RU
    Ayres, LW
    Martinas, K
    [J]. ENERGY, 1998, 23 (05) : 355 - 363
  • [6] Life cycle accounting: towards life cycle design
    Uday R. Parikh
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2002, 7 (3) : 183 - 183
  • [7] Forestry carbon budget models to improve biogenic carbon accounting in life cycle assessment
    Head, Marieke
    Bernier, Pierre
    Levasseur, Annie
    Beauregard, Robert
    Margni, Manuele
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 213 : 289 - 299
  • [8] Carbon assessment and cost accounting of a shared building based on the life cycle assessment
    Lei, Yi
    Dong, Lili
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOW-CARBON TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 18 : 1015 - 1025
  • [9] Carbon accounting of negative emissions technologies integrated in the life cycle of spirulina supplements
    Fernandez-Rios, Ana
    Butnar, Isabela
    Margallo, Maria
    Laso, Jara
    Borrion, Aiduan
    Aldaco, Ruben
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 890
  • [10] Accounting for soil carbon changes in agricultural life cycle assessment (LCA): a review
    Goglio, Pietro
    Smith, Ward N.
    Grant, Brian B.
    Desjardins, Raymond L.
    McConkey, Brian G.
    Campbell, Con A.
    Nemecek, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 104 : 23 - 39