Practical guide to coproduction in conservation science

被引:8
|
作者
Caro, Tim [1 ]
Andrews, Jeffrey [2 ]
Clark, Matthew [3 ]
Mulder, Monique Borgerhoff [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Biol Sci, Bristol, England
[2] Max Planck Inst Evolutionary Anthropol, Dept Human Behav Ecol & Culture, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Boise State Univ, Human Environm Syst Res Grp, Boise, ID USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Anthropol, Davis, CA USA
[5] Max Planck Inst Evolutionary Anthropol, Dept Human Behav Ecol & Culture, Deutscher Pl 6, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
CBNRM; conservation science; coproduction; co-production; Pemba; REDD plus; Tanzania; REDD PLUS; KNOWLEDGE; IMPLEMENTATION; RELEVANCE; IMPACT; POLICY; PEMBA; GAP;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.14011
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
We considered a series of conservation-related research projects on the island of Pemba, Tanzania, to reflect on the broad significance of Beier et al.'s recommendations for linking conservation science with practical conservation outcomes. The implementation of just some of their suggestions can advance a successful coproduction of actionable science by small research teams. Key elements include, first, scientists and managers working together in the field to ensure feedback in real time; second, questions jointly identified by managers and researchers to facilitate engaged collaboration; third, conducting research at multiple sites, thereby broadening managers' abilities to reach multiple stakeholders; and fourth, establishing a multidisciplinary team because most of the concerns of local managers require input from multiple disciplines.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条