When and Under What Conditions Does an Emission Trading Scheme Become Cost Effective?

被引:5
|
作者
Zhang, Hongyan [1 ]
Zhang, Lin [2 ]
Zhang, Ning [3 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Sch Econ & Management, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Sch Energy & Environm, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ, Inst Blue & Green Dev, Weihai, Peoples R China
来源
ENERGY JOURNAL | 2024年 / 45卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon trading; ETS; Cost efficiency; Thermal power plant; China; QUANTITY CONTROLS; COMBINING PRICE; CHINA; GENERATION; PERSISTENT; EFFICIENCY; EARNINGS; ECONOMY; FIRMS;
D O I
10.5547/01956574.45.2.hzha
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper studies when and under what conditions the actions undertaken by the power plants involved in China's emission trading scheme (ETS) pilot became cost effective. Based on unique plant-level panel data and the difference-in-differences strategy, we identify that an insignificant initial reduction in cost efficiency occurred at the announcement stage for power plants in the pilot provinces; however, the cost efficiency of the pilot plants increased significantly following formal policy implementation. Additionally, the by-stage treatment effects differed across the pilot provinces due to localized market and non-market variations. Localized conditions of higher marketization, stricter policy enforcement, and lower carbon dependence enhanced this positive effect. The synthetic control results confirmed this variation in the policy effects. The carbon trading pilots resulted in improved efficiency in power plants in Shanghai, Guangdong, and Tianjin during the period 2013-2017, with an associated total cost saving of approximately 29.75 million RMB. To enhance the efficacy of the ETS policy, our findings suggest that the design of the policy should consider localized external factors.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] DOES ACTH ACT AT THE CELL MEMBRANE OR INTRACELLULARY - AT WHAT CONCENTRATION DOES IT BECOME EFFECTIVE IN STIMULATING RELEASE OF HORMONE
    ARCHIBALD, RM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1954, 14 (07): : 761 - 761
  • [42] Evolutionary game analysis of prefabricated buildings adoption under carbon emission trading scheme
    He, Qiufeng
    Wu, Junchao
    Wu, Zezhou
    Zhang, Jiasheng
    Chen, Xiangsheng
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 249
  • [43] The dynamic analysis on low-carbon building adoption under emission trading scheme
    Du, Qiang
    Wang, Yalei
    Pang, Qiaoyu
    Hao, Tingting
    Zhou, Yuqing
    ENERGY, 2023, 263
  • [44] Optimising containership speed and fleet size under a carbon tax and an emission trading scheme
    Kim, Jae-Gon
    Kim, Hwa-Joong
    Lee, Paul Tae-Woo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND TRANSPORT LOGISTICS, 2013, 5 (06) : 571 - 590
  • [45] Carbon emission trading scheme and university technology transfer: does innovation quantity or quality matter?
    Jiang, Han
    Zhou, Qing
    Hu, Chuan
    Tian, Meng
    JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2025,
  • [46] Challenges and Solutions Toward Green Logistics Under EU-Emission Trading Scheme
    Li, Fang
    Haasis, Hans-Dietrich
    Dovbischuk, Irina
    DYNAMICS IN LOGISTICS, LDIC, 2014, 2016, : 397 - 405
  • [47] A Bi-Objective Reverse Logistics Network Design Under the Emission Trading Scheme
    Yuchi, Qunli
    Wang, Nengmin
    Li, Shuang
    Yang, Zhen
    Jiang, Bin
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 105072 - 105085
  • [48] Working under intensive surveillance: When does 'measuring everything that moves' become intolerable?
    Sewell, Graham
    Barker, James R.
    Nyberg, Daniel
    HUMAN RELATIONS, 2012, 65 (02) : 189 - 215
  • [49] Harmonizing emission allocation -: What are the equity consequences for the sectors in and outside the EU-trading scheme
    Hoffmann, Tim
    Loeschel, Andreas
    Moslener, Ulf
    ECONOMIC MODELLING OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY POLICIES, 2006, : 65 - 78
  • [50] The impact of the Tokyo emissions trading scheme on office buildings: what factor contributed to the emission reduction?
    Toshi H. Arimura
    Tatsuya Abe
    Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2021, 23 : 517 - 533