A Multi-Stage Faster RCNN-Based iSPLInception for Skin Disease Classification Using Novel Optimization

被引:7
|
作者
Josphineleela, R. [1 ]
Rao, P. B. V. Raja [2 ]
Shaikh, Amir [3 ]
Sudhakar, K. [4 ]
机构
[1] Panimalar Engn Coll, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Shri Vishnu Engn Coll Women A, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, JNTUK, Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh, India
[3] Graph Era Deemed Be Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Dehra Dun, Uttarakhand, India
[4] Madanapalle Inst Technol & Sci, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Madanapalle, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
Skin cancer prediction; Prairie dog optimization; Intelligent signal processing lab inception; Region proposal networks;
D O I
10.1007/s10278-023-00848-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Nowadays, skin cancer is considered a serious disorder in which early identification and treatment of the disease are essential to ensure the stability of the patients. Several existing skin cancer detection methods are introduced by employing deep learning (DL) to perform skin disease classification. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can classify melanoma skin cancer images. But, it suffers from an overfitting problem. Therefore, to overcome this problem and to classify both benign and malignant tumors efficiently, the multi-stage faster RCNN-based iSPLInception (MFRCNN-iSPLI) method is proposed. Then, the test dataset is used for evaluating the proposed model performance. The faster RCNN is employed directly to perform image classification. This may heavily raise computation time and network complications. So, the iSPLInception model is applied in the multi-stage classification. In this, the iSPLInception model is formulated using the Inception-ResNet design. For candidate box deletion, the prairie dog optimization algorithm is utilized. We have utilized two skin disease datasets, namely, ISIC 2019 Skin lesion image classification and the HAM10000 dataset for conducting experimental results. The methods' accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score values are calculated, and the results are compared with the existing methods such as CNN, hybrid DL, Inception v3, and VGG19. With 95.82% accuracy, 96.85% precision, 96.52% recall, and 0.95% F1 score values, the output analysis of each measure verified the prediction and classification effectiveness of the method.
引用
收藏
页码:2210 / 2226
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Tourism scene classification based on multi-stage transfer learning model
    Tangquan Qi
    Yong Xu
    Haibin Ling
    [J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2019, 31 : 4341 - 4352
  • [32] Multi-stage Attention-based Capsule Networks for Image Classification
    Song, Yan
    Wang, Yong
    [J]. Zidonghua Xuebao/Acta Automatica Sinica, 2024, 50 (09): : 1804 - 1817
  • [33] Optimization of the SOC-based multi-stage constant current charging strategy using coyote optimization algorithm
    Huang, Qiu-Yuan
    Liu, Yi-Hua
    Chen, Guan-Jhu
    Luo, Yi-Feng
    Liu, Chun-Liang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2024, 77
  • [34] Flow characteristic optimization of a multi-stage orifice plate using surrogate-based modeling and Bayesian optimization
    Tengfei Tang
    Lei Lei
    Li Xiao
    Yili Peng
    Hongjian Zhou
    [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2023, 66
  • [35] Flow characteristic optimization of a multi-stage orifice plate using surrogate-based modeling and Bayesian optimization
    Tang, Tengfei
    Lei, Lei
    Xiao, Li
    Peng, Yili
    Zhou, Hongjian
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2023, 66 (08)
  • [36] Efficient multi-stage aerodynamic topology optimization using an operator-based analytical differentiation
    Ali Ghasemi
    Ali Elham
    [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2022, 65
  • [37] Efficient Approach for CFD-based Aerodynamic Optimization Using Multi-Stage Surrogate Model
    Teng, Long
    Li, Liu
    Lei, Peng
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 ASIA-PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, VOL 1 AND 2, 2010, : 354 - 358
  • [38] Goal-based investing based on multi-stage robust portfolio optimization
    Jang Ho Kim
    Yongjae Lee
    Woo Chang Kim
    Frank J. Fabozzi
    [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2022, 313 : 1141 - 1158
  • [39] Multi-Stage Classification Algorithm of Ship Target Based on HRRP Multi-Features
    Liu, Xiankang
    Wang, Baofa
    Xu, Xiaojian
    Liang, Jing
    Ren, Jie
    Wei, Cunwei
    [J]. 2011 6TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA), 2011, : 2249 - 2253
  • [40] MultiCost: Multi-stage Cost-sensitive Classification of Alzheimer's Disease
    Zhang, Daoqiang
    Shen, Dinggang
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING IN MEDICAL IMAGING, 2011, 7009 : 344 - 351