Single sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation exert no effect on sleepiness in patients with narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia

被引:1
|
作者
Hohenester, Michaela [1 ,2 ]
Langguth, Berthold [1 ]
Wetter, Thomas Christian [1 ]
Geisler, Peter [1 ]
Schecklmann, Martin [1 ]
Reissmann, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Regensburg, Germany
[2] Krankenhaus Barmherzigen Bruder Regensburg, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Regensburg, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
anodal tDCS; tRNS; hypersomnia; narcolepsy; idiopathic hypersomnia; vigilance; sleepiness; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; CLINICAL-FEATURES; LATENCY TEST; EXCITABILITY; BRAIN; VIGILANCE; TDCS; PERFORMANCE; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1288976
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
BackgroundHypersomnia poses major challenges to treatment providers given the limitations of available treatment options. In this context, the application of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) may open up new avenues to effective treatment. Preliminary evidence suggests both acute and longer-lasting positive effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on vigilance and sleepiness in hypersomniac patients. Based on these findings, the present study sought to investigate short-term effects of single sessions of tDCS and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on sleepiness in persons suffering from hypersomnia.MethodsA sample of 29 patients suffering from narcolepsy or idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) was recruited from the Regensburg Sleep Disorder Center and underwent single sessions of tES (anodal tDCS, tRNS, sham) over the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on three consecutive days in a double-blind, sham-controlled, pseudorandomized crossover trial. The primary study endpoint was the mean reaction time measured by the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) before and directly after the daily tES sessions. Secondary endpoints were additional PVT outcome metrics as well as subjective outcome parameters (e.g., Karolinska Sleepiness Scale; KSS).ResultsThere were no significant treatment effects neither on objective (i.e., PVT) nor on subjective indicators of sleepiness.ConclusionWe could not demonstrate any clinically relevant effects of single sessions of tDCS or tRNS on objective or subjective measures of sleepiness in patients with hypersomnia. However, we cannot exclude that repeated sessions of tES may affect vigilance or sleepiness in hypersomniac patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Transcranial direct current stimulation in acute stroke patients
    Hodics, T. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2012, 19 (09) : e94 - e94
  • [42] Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on cognitive function in stroke patients
    Shaker H.A.
    Sawan S.A.E.
    Fahmy E.M.
    Ismail R.S.
    Elrahman S.A.E.A.
    The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery, 54 (1)
  • [43] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Anxiety: Current Perspectives
    Stein, Dirson Joao
    Medeiros, Liciane Fernandes
    Caumo, Wolnei
    Torres, Iraci L. S.
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2020, 16 : 161 - 169
  • [44] Transcranial random noise stimulation is more effective than transcranial direct current stimulation for enhancing working memory in healthy individuals: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence
    Murphy, O. W.
    Hoy, K. E.
    Wong, D.
    Bailey, N. W.
    Fitzgerald, P. B.
    Segrave, R. A.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2020, 13 (05) : 1370 - 1380
  • [45] Bifrontal Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Improves Daytime Vigilance and Sleepiness in a Patient With Organic Hypersomnia Following Reanimation
    Frase, Lukas
    Maier, Jonathan G.
    Zittel, Sulamith
    Freyer, Tobias
    Riemann, Dieter
    Normann, Claus
    Feige, Bernd
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Nissen, Christoph
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2015, 8 (04) : 844 - 846
  • [46] Comments on: "Safety of repeated sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation: A systematic review"
    Alwardat, Mohammad
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2018, 11 (03) : 658 - 658
  • [47] Safety of Transcranial Magnetic and Transcranial Direct Current Brain Stimulation
    Paulus, Walter
    KLINISCHE NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE, 2017, 48 (01) : 17 - 20
  • [48] Progression of adverse effects over consecutive sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation
    Kortteenniemi, Aaron
    Javadi, Amir-Homayoun
    Wikgren, Jan
    Lehto, Soili M.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 128 (12) : 2397 - 2399
  • [49] Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation/transcranial direct current stimulation in cognitive neurorehabititation
    Miniussi, Carlo
    Cappa, Stefano F.
    Cohen, Leonardo G.
    Floel, Agnes
    Fregni, Felipe
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Oliveri, Massimiliano
    Pascua-Leone, Alvaro
    Paulus, Walter
    Priori, Alberto
    Walsh, Vincent
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2008, 1 (04) : 326 - 336
  • [50] Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
    Labruna, Ludovica
    Jamil, Asif
    Fresnoza, Shane
    Batsikadze, Giorgi
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Vanderschelden, Benjamin
    Ivry, Richard B.
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2016, 9 (01) : 8 - 15