Is F18 FDG PET-CT an Authoritative Investigation as Compared to Other Conventional Imaging (CECT) Modality in Treated Cervical Cancer Patients?

被引:0
|
作者
Jain, Tarun Kumar [1 ]
Agrawal, Namita [2 ]
Malhotra, Hemant [3 ]
Yadav, Ajay [3 ]
Yadav, Dinesh [4 ]
Punia, Anushree [5 ]
机构
[1] Mahatma Gandhi Med Coll & Hosp Jaipur, Dept Nucl Med, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
[2] ESIC, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Jaipur 302022, Rajasthan, India
[3] Mahatma Gandhi Med Coll & Hosp Jaipur, Dept Med Oncol, Jaipur 302022, Rajasthan, India
[4] Mahatma Gandhi Med Coll & Hosp Jaipur, Dept Surg Oncol, Jaipur 302022, Rajasthan, India
[5] Mahatma Gandhi Med Coll & Hosp Jaipur, Dept Radiat Oncol, Jaipur 302022, Rajasthan, India
关键词
F18 FDG PET-CT; Cervix cancer; Diagnostic performance; Second primary; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; INTEGRATED PET/CT; FOLLOW-UP; RECURRENCE; RISK; CHEMOTHERAPY; MALIGNANCIES; METASTASIS; SURVIVORS;
D O I
10.1007/s40944-023-00731-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced F18 FDG PET-CT with conventional modality (contrast-enhanced computed tomography) in restaging of cervical carcinoma. Study Design A retrospective analysis of histopathological proven patients of carcinoma cervix (n = 386; age range 32-82 years; mean age 51.4 years) between April 2017 and July 2022 was done. All the patients were treated either in combination or alone with surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy. The patients were referred for F18 FDG PET-CT on the basis of clinical and imaging suspicion of residual or recurrent disease and for post-therapy monitoring. Histopathological examination and clinical or imaging follow-up were taken as gold standard. Results Of 386 patients, underwent PET-CT examination for post-therapy monitoring. F18 FDG PET-CT detected abnormal FDG uptake in 258 patients. Uptake at the primary site was detected in 112/258 (43.41%) patients, and only regional pelvic lymph nodes and distant metastatic lesions were in 18/258 (similar to 6.96%) and 128/258 (49.4%) patients, respectively. On lesion-based analyses, distant metastases, lymph nodes, lung, liver and skeleton were noted in 128, 50, 18 and 30 patients respectively, either isolated or combined. Fourteen patients had distant metastases at rare sites including kidney, muscle, ascites, pleural effusion and gut (4, 4, 2, 2, 2). Additionally, metachronous primaries were also detected in 18 patients and confirmed on histopathology (lung-6, pharynx-4, breast-4, lymphoma-2 and rectum-2). After a median follow-up period of 30 months (+/_; SD 20.8), 226 patients having residual or recurrence disease and FDG PET-CT had the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy as 89.38, 65, 78.29, 81.25 and 80%, respectively, while conventional imaging (CI) had the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of 66.42, 40.68, 71.77, 34.78 and 70%, respectively. On ROC curve analysis, SUVmax > 4.4 had sensitivity and specificity 78.8 and 83.7%, respectively, for lesion detection on F18 FDG PET-CT. There was a significant correlation between SUVmax and patient outcome (r = similar to 0.0585). Conclusions This study concluded that F18 FDG PET-CT has high diagnostic accuracy as compared to conventional imaging for detection of suspected residual/recurrent disease in cervical cancer patients and also useful in detection of additional metachronous second primary.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of 18F FDG PET-CT AND CECT in pretreatment staging of adults with Hodgkin's lymphoma
    Panebianco, Martina
    Bagni, Oreste
    Cenfra, Natalia
    Mecarocci, Sergio
    La Barbera, Elettra Ortu
    Filippi, Luca
    Codacci-Pisanelli, Giovanni
    Biondi, Tommaso
    Laghi, Andrea
    Cimino, Giuseppe
    LEUKEMIA RESEARCH, 2019, 76 : 48 - 52
  • [42] F-18 FDG PET-CT Imaging of Intestinal Metastasis From Primary Lung Cancer
    Kim, Min Soo
    Cheon, Gi Jeong
    Lim, Sang Moo
    Kim, Cheol Hyeon
    Lee, Jae Cheol
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2008, 33 (12) : 870 - 871
  • [43] 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to conventional imaging modalities in pediatric primary bone tumors
    London, Kevin
    Stege, Claudia
    Cross, Siobhan
    Onikul, Ella
    Graf, Nicole
    Kaspers, Gertjan
    Dalla-Pozza, Luciano
    Howman-Giles, Robert
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2012, 42 (04) : 418 - 430
  • [44] 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to conventional imaging modalities in pediatric primary bone tumors
    Kevin London
    Claudia Stege
    Siobhan Cross
    Ella Onikul
    Nicole Graf
    Gertjan Kaspers
    Luciano Dalla-Pozza
    Robert Howman-Giles
    Pediatric Radiology, 2012, 42 : 418 - 430
  • [45] Prognostic significance of 18F-FDG PET-CT in Gynecological Cancer
    Spiridon, P.
    Gherman, A.
    Mazilu, C.
    Cuzino, D.
    Calin, C.
    Radu, F. Ionita
    Jinga, M.
    Mititelu, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 49 (SUPPL 1) : S516 - S516
  • [46] Is 18F FDG PET-CT cost effective in lung cancer?
    Buscombe, John
    O'Rourke, E.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2007, 7 (04) : 471 - 476
  • [47] VALUE OF 18F-FDG PET-CT IN STAGING GASTRIC CANCER
    Dassen, A.
    Lips, D.
    Hoekstra, C.
    Pruijt, J.
    Bosscha, K.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 : 88 - 88
  • [48] 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging in patients with cutaneous lymphoma: single institutional experience
    Agarwal, K. K.
    Mukherjee, A.
    Sharma, P.
    Singh, H.
    Kumar, R.
    Bal, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2016, 43 : S317 - S317
  • [49] 18F-FDG PET/CT Habitat Radiomics Predicts Outcome of Patients with Cervical Cancer Treated with Chemoradiotherapy
    Mu, Wei
    Liang, Ying
    Hall, Lawrence O.
    Tan, Yan
    Balagurunathan, Yoganand
    Wenham, Robert
    Wu, Ning
    Tian, Jie
    Gillies, Robert J.
    RADIOLOGY-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 2 (06) : 1 - 10
  • [50] [18F]-FDG PET-CT before and after treatment can predict survival in cervical cancer
    Markus, M.
    Sartor, H.
    Bjurberg, M.
    Tragardh, E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 49 (SUPPL 1) : S513 - S514