Is F18 FDG PET-CT an Authoritative Investigation as Compared to Other Conventional Imaging (CECT) Modality in Treated Cervical Cancer Patients?

被引:0
|
作者
Jain, Tarun Kumar [1 ]
Agrawal, Namita [2 ]
Malhotra, Hemant [3 ]
Yadav, Ajay [3 ]
Yadav, Dinesh [4 ]
Punia, Anushree [5 ]
机构
[1] Mahatma Gandhi Med Coll & Hosp Jaipur, Dept Nucl Med, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
[2] ESIC, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Jaipur 302022, Rajasthan, India
[3] Mahatma Gandhi Med Coll & Hosp Jaipur, Dept Med Oncol, Jaipur 302022, Rajasthan, India
[4] Mahatma Gandhi Med Coll & Hosp Jaipur, Dept Surg Oncol, Jaipur 302022, Rajasthan, India
[5] Mahatma Gandhi Med Coll & Hosp Jaipur, Dept Radiat Oncol, Jaipur 302022, Rajasthan, India
关键词
F18 FDG PET-CT; Cervix cancer; Diagnostic performance; Second primary; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; INTEGRATED PET/CT; FOLLOW-UP; RECURRENCE; RISK; CHEMOTHERAPY; MALIGNANCIES; METASTASIS; SURVIVORS;
D O I
10.1007/s40944-023-00731-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced F18 FDG PET-CT with conventional modality (contrast-enhanced computed tomography) in restaging of cervical carcinoma. Study Design A retrospective analysis of histopathological proven patients of carcinoma cervix (n = 386; age range 32-82 years; mean age 51.4 years) between April 2017 and July 2022 was done. All the patients were treated either in combination or alone with surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy. The patients were referred for F18 FDG PET-CT on the basis of clinical and imaging suspicion of residual or recurrent disease and for post-therapy monitoring. Histopathological examination and clinical or imaging follow-up were taken as gold standard. Results Of 386 patients, underwent PET-CT examination for post-therapy monitoring. F18 FDG PET-CT detected abnormal FDG uptake in 258 patients. Uptake at the primary site was detected in 112/258 (43.41%) patients, and only regional pelvic lymph nodes and distant metastatic lesions were in 18/258 (similar to 6.96%) and 128/258 (49.4%) patients, respectively. On lesion-based analyses, distant metastases, lymph nodes, lung, liver and skeleton were noted in 128, 50, 18 and 30 patients respectively, either isolated or combined. Fourteen patients had distant metastases at rare sites including kidney, muscle, ascites, pleural effusion and gut (4, 4, 2, 2, 2). Additionally, metachronous primaries were also detected in 18 patients and confirmed on histopathology (lung-6, pharynx-4, breast-4, lymphoma-2 and rectum-2). After a median follow-up period of 30 months (+/_; SD 20.8), 226 patients having residual or recurrence disease and FDG PET-CT had the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy as 89.38, 65, 78.29, 81.25 and 80%, respectively, while conventional imaging (CI) had the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of 66.42, 40.68, 71.77, 34.78 and 70%, respectively. On ROC curve analysis, SUVmax > 4.4 had sensitivity and specificity 78.8 and 83.7%, respectively, for lesion detection on F18 FDG PET-CT. There was a significant correlation between SUVmax and patient outcome (r = similar to 0.0585). Conclusions This study concluded that F18 FDG PET-CT has high diagnostic accuracy as compared to conventional imaging for detection of suspected residual/recurrent disease in cervical cancer patients and also useful in detection of additional metachronous second primary.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is F18 FDG PET-CT an Authoritative Investigation as Compared to Other Conventional Imaging (CECT) Modality in Treated Cervical Cancer Patients?
    Tarun Kumar Jain
    Namita Agrawal
    Hemant Malhotra
    Ajay Yadav
    Dinesh Yadav
    Anushree Punia
    Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2023, 21
  • [2] The yield of F18 FDG PET-CT for the investigation of fever of unknown origin, compared with diagnostic CT
    Buchrits, S.
    Gafter-Gvili, A.
    Eynath, Y.
    Bernstine, H.
    Guz, D.
    Avni, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 93 : 50 - 56
  • [3] Comparison of 18F-FDG PET-CT and conventional imaging for restaging of patients with oral cancer
    Dhull, Varun
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Sharma, Punit
    Sahoo, Manas
    Malhotra, Arun
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2012, 53
  • [4] 18F-FDG PET-CT Compared to Conventional Staging Procedures in Patients with Advanced Breast Carcinoma
    Fris, J. H. A.
    Duchateau, C. S. J.
    van Gils, A. P. G.
    Merkus, J. W. S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 : S60 - S61
  • [5] F-18 FDG PET-CT in restaging of patients with cervical cancer: - experience at a tertiary care hospital
    Jain, T. K.
    Basher, R. K.
    Mittal, B. R.
    Shukla, J.
    Bhattacharya, A.
    Suri, V.
    Kumar, N.
    Kumar, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2015, 42 : S685 - S685
  • [6] F-18 FDG PET-CT Imaging in Gastric Sarcoma
    Gamble, Brian
    Meka, Murali
    Ho, Linh
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 34 (09) : 564 - 565
  • [7] Imaging thrombus in cancer patients with FDG PET-CT
    Sharma, Punit
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Singh, Harmandeep
    Jeph, Sunil
    Patnecha, Manish
    Reddy, Rama Mohan
    Naswa, Niraj
    Bal, Chandrasekhar
    Malhotra, Arun
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 30 (02) : 95 - 104
  • [8] F-18 FDG PET-CT imaging of a mycotic aneurysm
    Davison, JM
    Montilla-Soler, JL
    Broussard, E
    Wilson, R
    Cap, A
    Allen, T
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2005, 30 (07) : 483 - 487
  • [9] Role of 18F-FDG PET-CT in restaging of patients with carcinoma of tongue and comparison with conventional imaging modalities
    Dhull, V. S.
    Kumar, R.
    Singhal, A.
    Sahoo, M. K.
    Jeph, S.
    Reddy, R.
    Kc, S. S.
    Malhotra, A.
    Bal, C. S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2011, 38 : S170 - S170
  • [10] Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET-CT for detection of recurrence in patients with endometrial carcinoma: Comparison with conventional imaging
    Singh, Harmandeep
    Sharma, Punit
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Jeph, Sunil
    Kundu, Parveen
    Nazar, Aftab
    Kumar, Abhishek
    Bal, Chandrasekhar
    Bandopadhyaya, Guru
    Malhotra, Arun
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 52