How do researchers perceive research misbehaviors? A case study of Indian researchers

被引:7
|
作者
Palla, Ishfaq Ahmad [1 ]
Singson, Mangkhollen [1 ]
机构
[1] Pondicherry Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Pondicherry 605014, India
关键词
Authorship disputes; plagiarism publish or perish; qualitative research; research misbehaviors; OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; RESEARCH INTEGRITY; PLAGIARISM; PUBLICATION; PERSPECTIVE; PREVALENCE; SCIENCE; FRAUD;
D O I
10.1080/08989621.2022.2078712
中图分类号
R-052 [医学伦理学];
学科分类号
0101 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Despite ample evidence of increasing research misconduct in India, little attention has been paid to understanding researchers' perception of research integrity and research misconduct among young Indian researchers. Interviews among 30 research scholars were conducted at Pondicherry University in India to understand their experience and perception of research misconduct. The top three influencing factors for scientific misconduct, according to the participants, were unavailability of adequate funds (35%), pressure from research supervisors (29%), and desperation to publish articles (25%). The participants had witnessed research misconduct in different forms i.e., data fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. However, plagiarism was the most often cited cause of misbehavior in our interviews. Majority of participants have witnessed or personally encountered multiple instances where authorship conflicts occurred. The other questionable research practices highlighted in the study were improper citations, authorship disputes like gift and ghost authorships, misrepresentation of statistical data, failure to publish negative results. In an increasingly diverse and changing research environment, our research calls for practical research guidelines based on honesty, openness, and accountability that can help articulate and strengthen scientists' core values. More importantly, scientific misconduct can only be prevented by using a multifaceted strategy that includes identifying instances of scientific misconduct and implementing suitable deterrents and treatments that could change the behavior associated with such misconduct.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 724
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How much stress do researchers inflict on their study animals?: A case study using a scincid lizard, Eulamprus heatwolei
    Langkilde, T
    Shine, R
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2006, 209 (06): : 1035 - 1043
  • [42] How do researchers determine the difference to be detected in superiority trials? Results of a survey from a panel of researchers
    Gayet-Ageron, Angele
    Jannot, Anne-Sophie
    Agoritsas, Thomas
    Rudaz, Sandrine
    Combescure, Christophe
    Perneger, Thomas
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2016, 16
  • [43] How do researchers influence decision-makers? Case studies of Mexican policies
    Trostle, J
    Bronfman, M
    Langer, A
    HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 1999, 14 (02) : 103 - 114
  • [44] Research to do, results to sell: enabling subjects and researchers
    Tomaselli, Keyan
    McLennan-Dodd, Vanessa
    Shepperson, Arnold
    SOUTH AFRICAN REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2005, 36 (01) : 24 - 37
  • [45] Do Research Incentives Promote Researchers' Mental Health?
    Gu, Liujian
    Wang, Tao
    Wang, Chuanyi
    Crabbe, M. James C.
    Yue, Xiao-Guang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH PROMOTION, 2023, 25 (08) : 903 - 914
  • [46] HOW RESEARCH AND RESEARCHERS ARE VIEWED BY NATIVE AMERICAN PARTICIPANTS
    Lampley-Dallas, V. T.
    Edwards, K.
    Stephens, L.
    Aston, C.
    Joines, A.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2008, 48 : 422 - 422
  • [47] How Do Doctoral Candidates Learn to Be Researchers? Developing Research Training Programs in Kinesiology Departments
    Solmon, Melinda A.
    QUEST, 2009, 61 (01) : 74 - 83
  • [48] Playing with Data—Or How to Discourage Questionable Research Practices and Stimulate Researchers to Do Things Right
    Klaas Sijtsma
    Psychometrika, 2016, 81 : 1 - 15
  • [49] Collaborative research between clinicians and researchers: a multiple case study of implementation
    Blevins, Dean
    Farmer, Mary S.
    Edlund, Carrie
    Sullivan, Greer
    Kirchner, JoAnn E.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2010, 5
  • [50] Collaborative research between clinicians and researchers: a multiple case study of implementation
    Dean Blevins
    Mary S Farmer
    Carrie Edlund
    Greer Sullivan
    JoAnn E Kirchner
    Implementation Science, 5