Hope and Exploitation in Commercial Provision of Assisted Reproductive Technologies

被引:2
|
作者
Wrigley, Anthony
Watts, Gabriel
Lipworth, Wendy
Newson, Ainsley J.
机构
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
hope; exploitation; assisted reproductive technologies; physician-patient relationship; bioethics; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; ADD-ONS; ENDOMETRIUM; CARE;
D O I
10.1002/hast.1513
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Innovation is a key driver of care provision in assisted reproductive technologies (ART). ART providers offer a range of add-on interventions, aiming to augment standard in vitro fertilization protocols and improve the chances of a live birth. Particularly in the context of commercial provision, an ever-increasing array of add-ons are marketed to ART patients, even when evidence to support them is equivocal. A defining feature of ART is hope-hope that a cycle will lead to a baby or that another test or intervention will make a difference. Yet such hope also leaves ART patients vulnerable in a variety of ways. This article argues that previous attempts to safeguard ART patients have neglected how the use of add-ons in commercial ART can exploit patients' hopes. Commercial providers of ART should provide add-ons only free of charge, under a suitable research protocol.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 41
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条