The Challenges for Manufacturers of the Increased Clinical Evaluation in the European Medical Device Regulations: A Quantitative Study

被引:10
|
作者
Kearney, Breda [1 ]
McDermott, Olivia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Galway, Coll Sci & Engn, Galway, Ireland
关键词
MedTech; Medical device; European Medical device regulations; Clinical trials; Clinical evaluation;
D O I
10.1007/s43441-023-00527-z
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
The European Union Medical Device Regulations 2017/745 entered into force on May 2021 with changes related to strengthening the clinical evaluation requirements, particularly for high-risk devices. This study investigates how the increased requirements on medical device manufacturers in relation to how clinical evaluation will challenge manufacturers. A quantitative survey study was utilized with responses from 68 senior or functional area subject matter experts working in medical device manufacturing Regulatory or Quality roles. The findings from the study demonstrated that the highest source of reactive Post-Market Surveillance data was customer complaints and proactive data were Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up. In contrast, the top 3 sources for generating clinical evaluation data for legacy devices under the new Medical Device Regulations were Post-Market Surveillance data, Scientific literature reviews, and Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up studies. Manufacturers' biggest challenge under the new Medical Device Regulations is determining the amount of data needed to generate sufficient clinical evidence, while over 60% of high-risk device manufacturers have outsourced the writing of their clinical evaluation reports. Manufacturers also reported a high investment in clinical evaluation training and highlighted inconsistencies in the requirements for clinical data by different notified bodies. These challenges may lead to a potential shortage of certain medical devices in the E.U. and a delay in access to new devices, negatively impacting patient quality of life (1). This study provides a unique insight into the challenges currently experienced by medical device manufacturers as they transition to the MDR clinical evaluation requirements and the subsequent impact on the continued availability of medical devices in the E.U.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 796
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Meeting an End-user Need in a Collaborative High Risk Medical Device Software Development in Accordance with Future European Regulations
    Py, Stephanie
    Lihoreau, Thomas
    Puyraveau, Marc
    Grosdemouge, Sylvain
    Butterlin, Nadia
    Francois, Stephanie
    Eveilleau, Morgane
    Camelio, Aurelie
    Thiriez, Gerard
    Ciceron, Floriane
    Ecoffet, Pauline
    BIODEVICES: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES - VOL 1: BIODEVICES, 2021, : 265 - 273
  • [42] Medical device regulatory affairs 101 ─ target of regulation and non-clinical/clinical evaluation ─
    Suzuki T.
    Transactions of Japanese Society for Medical and Biological Engineering, 2020, 58 (2-3) : 86 - 92
  • [43] Critical appraisal of the Minimal Clinical Recommendations (MCR) of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO): challenges for a European framework for the development of clinical practice guidelines
    Fervers, B
    Philip, T
    Browman, GP
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (09) : 1507 - 1509
  • [44] An average enumeration method of hyperspectral imaging data for quantitative evaluation of medical device surface contamination
    Le, Hanh N. D.
    Kim, Moon S.
    Hwang, Jeeseong
    Yang, Yi
    U-Thainual, Paweena
    Kang, Jin U.
    Kim, Do-Hyun
    BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, 2014, 5 (10): : 3613 - 3627
  • [45] Integration of medical device design training in clinical teaching - A case study
    Anbarasi, K.
    Mohamed, Kasim
    ASIA PACIFIC SCHOLAR, 2021, 6 (02): : 91 - 93
  • [46] Late adverse event reporting from medical device manufacturers to the US Food and Drug Administration: cross sectional study
    Everhart, Alexander
    Karaca-Mandic, Pinar
    Redberg, Rita F.
    Ross, Joseph S.
    Dhruva, Sanket
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2025, 388
  • [47] Clinical Evaluation of a Software Medical Device for the Self-Assessment of Patients Living with Multiple Sclerosis: Results of the MSCopilot Study
    Maillart, Elisabeth
    Labauge, Pierre
    Cohen, Mikael
    Maarouf, Adil
    Vukusic, Sandra
    Donze, Cecile
    Gallien, Philippe
    De Seze, Jerome
    Bourre, Bertrand
    Moreau, Thibault
    Bieuvelet, Severine
    Vallee, Morgane
    Bertillot, Fabien
    Argoud, Anne-Laure
    Zinai, Saad
    Tourbah, Ayman
    NEUROLOGY, 2019, 92 (15)
  • [48] The battle to reduce nosocomial infections, the results of a european clinical study with medical
    Devan Chemicals, Ronse-Renaix, Belgium
    不详
    不详
    Unitex, 2009, 4-5 (31-33):
  • [49] Critical appraisal of the Minimal Clinical Recommendations (MCR) of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO): challenges for a European framework for the development of clinical practice guidelines - Reply
    Stahel, R
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (09) : 1509 - 1509
  • [50] Clinical results with ProDisc: European experience and US Investigation Device Exemption study
    Zigler, JE
    SPINE, 2003, 28 (20) : S163 - S166