Communication partner training with familiar partners of people with aphasia: A systematic review and synthesis of barriers and facilitators to implementation

被引:6
|
作者
Shrubsole, Kirstine [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Power, Emma [4 ,5 ]
Halle, Marie-Christine [6 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Aphasia Res Ctr, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[3] Southern Cross Univ, Fac Hlth, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[4] Ctr Res Excellence Aphasia Recovery & Rehabil, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Technol Sydney, Grad Sch Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ Quebec Trois Rivieres, Speech & Language Pathol Dept, Trois Rivieres, PQ, Canada
关键词
aphasia; barriers and facilitators; communication partner training; implementation; systematic review; SIGNIFICANT OTHERS; CONVERSATION; SPEECH; SERVICES; BEHAVIOR; PROGRAM; SPOUSES; MEMBERS; ADULTS; PROFESSIONALS;
D O I
10.1111/1460-6984.12805
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
BackgroundFactors influencing the implementation of communication partner training (CPT) with familiar partners of people with aphasia (PWA) have previously been documented using disparate approaches. To date there has been no synthesis of these factors using a common theoretical framework. Investigating CPT implementation factors using a common theoretical framework may further our understanding of universal barriers and guide future development of tailored, theoretically informed implementation strategies. Aims(1) To determine the perceived and/or observed barriers and facilitators to implementing CPT with familiar partners of adults with aphasia; (2) to map extracted barriers and facilitators to a common theoretical framework; (3) to synthesize extracted barriers and facilitators; and (4) to identify potential implementation strategies to address the most frequently identified barriers and facilitators. Methods & ProceduresA systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science) were systematically searched in April 2021. Empirical qualitative and/or quantitative research studies reporting barriers/facilitators to speech-language therapists (SLTs) implementing CPT with familiar partners of adults with aphasia were included. The search was limited to English or French articles with no date limit applied. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). A framework and content analysis was then conducted to extract and synthesize the implementation factors in alignment with the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), followed by a theoretically informed mapping exercise to identify potential implementation strategies. Results & Main contributionThe database searches yielded 2115 studies. Following screening, 17 studies were included in the review. Overall, the included studies had good methodological quality. Extracted implementation factors were classified as barriers, facilitators or mixed (i.e., both) and aligned with 13 of the 14 TDF domains, plus two additional domains: 'carer perspectives on the CPT intervention' and 'patient/carer characteristics'. Synthesized data revealed eight key theoretical domains: Environmental context and resources; Social influences; Beliefs about consequences; Skills; Memory, attention and decision-making; Knowledge; Beliefs about capabilities; and Reinforcement. Within each domain, the research team identified common categories and developed illustrative examples of theoretically informed implementation strategies. Conclusions & ImplicationsThis systematic review and theory-informed synthesis of previously reported CPT implementation factors enabled the identification of key barriers to SLTs delivering this best practice. This led to proposed implementation strategies that should be validated, refined and evaluated in future research involving stakeholders who have contextual understanding of implementing CPT. What this paper addsWhat is already known on the subjectCPT of familiar partners of PWA is an effective intervention that is inconsistently used in clinical settings. Factors influencing CPT implementation have previously been identified, but using disparate approaches and frameworks. A synthesis of these factors articulated around a common framework is currently not available. What this paper adds to existing knowledgeThis paper provides a theory-informed synthesis of previously reported barriers and facilitators to SLTs implementing CPT with familiar partners of PWA. It highlights key factors influencing the uptake of this best practice and includes suggestion of implementation strategies to address them. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?The key influencing factors and proposed implementation strategies reported in this paper may support stakeholders in the future design of tailored and theoretically informed implementation strategies aiming to improve the delivery of familiar CPT in their setting.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 628
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Communication Partner Training in Aphasia: A Systematic Review
    Simmons-Mackie, Nina
    Raymer, Anastasia
    Armstrong, Elizabeth
    Holland, Audrey
    Cherney, Leora R.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2010, 91 (12): : 1814 - 1837
  • [2] Communication Partner Training in Aphasia: An Updated Systematic Review
    Simmons-Mackie, Nina
    Raymer, Anastasia
    Cherney, Leora R.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2016, 97 (12): : 2202 - 2221
  • [3] Communication Challenges for People with Chronic Aphasia: A Systematic Qualitative Review of Barriers and Facilitators in Local Services
    Poirier, Sarah-Eve
    Voyer, Laurie-Anne
    Poulin, Valerie
    Lamontagne, Marie-Eve
    Monetta, Laura
    [J]. DISABILITIES, 2024, 4 (03): : 616 - 631
  • [4] Systematic review of communication partner training in aphasia: Methodological quality
    Cherney, Leora R.
    Simmons-Mackie, Nina
    Raymer, Anastasia
    Armstrong, Elizabeth
    Holland, Audrey
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2013, 15 (05) : 535 - 545
  • [5] Barriers and Facilitators to Communication Accessibility as Perceived by People With Aphasia
    Kim, Esther S.
    Mauriks, Kira
    Wilson, Carlee
    Auch, Leah
    Koo, Herman
    Swensrude, Daralynn
    Laccett, Jessica
    Ruelling, Andrea
    [J]. TOPICS IN LANGUAGE DISORDERS, 2023, 43 (01) : 76 - 90
  • [6] Effects of Communication Partner Training on People with Aphasia
    Finch, E.
    Cameron, A.
    Fleming, J.
    Lethlean, J.
    Brown, K.
    Mcphail, S.
    [J]. CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2016, 42 : 101 - 101
  • [7] STAFF TRAINING, FACILITATORS AND BARRIERS TO IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PECS PROTOCOL: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Paris, A.
    Hastings, R.
    Denne, L.
    Grindle, C.
    May, R.
    Apanasionok, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2019, 63 (07) : 707 - 707
  • [8] Facilitators and barriers for the implementation of resuscitation training programmes for schoolchildren A systematic review
    Wingen, Sabine
    Jeck, Julia
    Schroeder, Daniel C.
    Wingen-Heimann, Sebastian M.
    Drost, Ruben M. W. A.
    Boettiger, Bernd W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 39 (08) : 711 - 719
  • [9] Systematic Review of Training Communication Partners of Chinese- speaking Persons With Aphasia
    Kong, Anthony Pak-Hin
    Chan, Kristie Pui-Yan
    Jagoe, Caroline
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND CLINICAL TRANSLATION, 2021, 3 (04)
  • [10] Communication partner training for persons with aphasia: a systematic review of Portuguese language publications
    Matos, Maria
    Abreu, Elisabeth
    Brandao, Lenisa
    Santos, Joana
    Lima, Roxele
    Machado, Thais
    Mancini, Marina
    Jagoe, Caroline
    [J]. APHASIOLOGY, 2024,