Prediction of very early subclinical rejection with machine learning in kidney transplantation

被引:3
|
作者
Jo, Sung Jun [1 ]
Park, Jae Berm [1 ]
Lee, Kyo Won [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 81 Irwon Ro, Seoul 06351, South Korea
关键词
RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; PROTOCOL BIOPSIES; THERAPEUTIC APHERESIS; GRAFT-SURVIVAL; POSTTRANSPLANTATION; MORTALITY; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-50066-8
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Protocol biopsy is a reliable method for assessing allografts status after kidney transplantation (KT). However, due to the risk of complications, it is necessary to establish indications and selectively perform protocol biopsies by classifying the high-risk group for early subclinical rejection (SCR). Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the incidence and risk factors of early SCR (within 2 weeks) and develop a prediction model using machine learning. Patients who underwent KT at Samsung Medical Center from January 2005 to December 2020 were investigated. The incidence of SCR was investigated and risk factors were analyzed. For the development of prediction model, machine learning methods (random forest, elastic net, extreme gradient boosting [XGB]) and logistic regression were used and the performance between the models was evaluated. The cohorts of 987 patients were reviewed and analyzed. The incidence of SCR was 14.6%. Borderline cellular rejection (BCR) was the most common type of rejection, accounting for 61.8% of cases. In the analysis of risk factors, recipient age (OR 0.98, p = 0.03), donor BMI (OR 1.07, p = 0.02), ABO incompatibility (OR 0.15, p < 0.001), HLA II mismatch (two [OR 6.44, p < 0.001]), and ATG induction (OR 0.41, p < 0.001) were associated with SCR in the multivariate analysis. The logistic regression prediction model (average AUC = 0.717) and the elastic net model (average AUC = 0.712) demonstrated good performance. HLA II mismatch and induction type were consistently identified as important variables in all models. The odds ratio analysis of the logistic prediction model revealed that HLA II mismatch (OR 6.77) was a risk factor for SCR, while ATG induction (OR 0.37) was a favorable factor. Early SCR was associated with HLA II mismatches and induction agent and prediction model using machine learning demonstrates the potential to predict SCR.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Subclinical rejection and borderline changes in early protocol biopsy specimens after renal transplantation
    Roberts, ISD
    Reddy, S
    Russell, C
    Davies, DR
    Friend, PJ
    Handa, AI
    Morris, PJ
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 77 (08) : 1194 - 1198
  • [42] Economic analysis of screening for subclinical rejection in kidney transplantation using protocol biopsies and noninvasive biomarkers
    Puttarajappa, Chethan M.
    Mehta, Rajil B.
    Roberts, Mark S.
    Smith, Kenneth J.
    Hariharan, Sundaram
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 21 (01) : 186 - 197
  • [43] Subclinical rejection and allograft survival in kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kalaria, Arjun Lalit
    Yamada, Takayuki
    Klein-Fedyshin, Michele
    Obata, Shota
    Cruz-Peralta, Massiel
    Parrish, Bryce
    Rahman, Amaan Z.
    Molinari, Michele
    Mehta, Rajil B.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (07): : 1 - 5
  • [44] Subclinical rejection-free diagnostic after kidney transplantation using blood gene expression
    Danger, Richard
    Le Berre, Ludmilla
    Cadoux, Marion
    Kerleau, Clarisse
    Papuchon, Emmanuell
    Le Mai, Hoa
    Nguyen, Thi-Van-Ha
    Guerif, Pierrick
    Morelon, Emmanuel
    Thaunat, Olivier
    Legendre, Christophe
    Anglicheau, Dany
    Lefaucheur, Carmen
    Couzi, Lionel
    Del Bello, Arnaud
    Kamar, Nassim
    Le Quintrec, Moglie
    Goutaudier, Valenti
    Renaudin, Karin
    Giral, Magal
    Brouard, Sophi
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 103 (06) : 1167 - 1179
  • [45] Subclinical Rejection-Free Diagnostic After Kidney Transplantation Using Blood Gene Expression
    Danger, R.
    Le Berre, L.
    Cadoux, M.
    Kerleau, C.
    Papuchon, E.
    Guerif, P.
    Morelon, E.
    Thaunat, O.
    Legendre, C.
    Anglicheau, D.
    Lefaucheur, C.
    Couzi, L.
    Del Bello, A.
    Kamar, N.
    Le Quintrec, M.
    Goutaudier, V.
    Loupy, A.
    Renaudin, K.
    Giral, M.
    Brouard, S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 23 (06) : S453 - S453
  • [46] Machine learning models for the early detection of urinary infections in post-kidney transplantation patients
    Castaneda, Liceth
    Puentes, Carlos
    Duitama, Alejandro
    Cardona, Andres
    Romero, Consuelo
    Ramos, Alejandro
    Perdomo, Sandra
    Camargo, Alejandro
    Gomez-Montero, Andrea
    Garcia-Lopez, Andrea
    Giron-Luque, Fernando
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 108 (09) : 727 - 727
  • [47] Interpretable machine learning models for early prediction of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery
    Jiang, Jicheng
    Liu, Xinyun
    Cheng, Zhaoyun
    Liu, Qianjin
    Xing, Wenlu
    [J]. BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [48] Machine learning in the prediction of cardiac surgery associated acute kidney injury with early postoperative biomarkers
    Fan, Rui
    Qin, Wei
    Zhang, Hao
    Guan, Lichun
    Wang, Wuwei
    Li, Jian
    Chen, Wen
    Huang, Fuhua
    Zhang, Hang
    Chen, Xin
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
  • [49] Machine learning model for early prediction of acute kidney injury (AKI) in pediatric critical care
    Junzi Dong
    Ting Feng
    Binod Thapa-Chhetry
    Byung Gu Cho
    Tunu Shum
    David P. Inwald
    Christopher J. L. Newth
    Vinay U. Vaidya
    [J]. Critical Care, 25
  • [50] Machine learning model for early prediction of acute kidney injury (AKI) in pediatric critical care
    Dong, Junzi
    Feng, Ting
    Thapa-Chhetry, Binod
    Cho, Byung Gu
    Shum, Tunu
    Inwald, David P.
    Newth, Christopher J. L.
    Vaidya, Vinay U.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 25 (01)