FACE-TO-FACE VS. ONLINE LEARNING in SCIENCE and ENGINEERING COURSES DURING COVID-19 EPOCH

被引:0
|
作者
Diez-Pascual, Ana Maria [1 ,3 ]
Garcia-Diaz, Pilar [2 ]
Pena-Capilla, Rafael [2 ]
Jurado-Sanchez, Beatriz [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alcala, Fac Ciencias, Dept Quim Analit Quim Fis & Ingn Quim, Alcala De Henares, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Alcala, Dept Teoria Senal & Comunicac, Alcala De Henares, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Alcala, Fac Ciencias, Dept Quim Analit Quim Fis & Ingn Quim, Km 33-6, Alcala De Henares 28805, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Online learning; inquiry-based learning; face-to-face learning; practical lessons; COVID-19; VIRTUAL LABORATORIES; CHEMISTRY TEACHERS; HIGHER-EDUCATION; PERFORMANCE; ENGAGEMENT; STUDENTS; INQUIRY; OUTCOMES; VIDEO;
D O I
10.1080/02635143.2023.2275136
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe new teaching scenario after COVID-19 results in the adoption of a complete online environment, providing a unique opportunity to compare in site (face-to-face) vs virtual (online) teaching. Due to the pandemic, practical activities have been replaced by written protocols supported with photos, video-recorded demos, linearsimulations, remote-controlled real laboratory instruments and so forth.PurposeThis article describes the adaptation from in site to online teaching in science and engineering subjects in a Spanish University during COVID-19. Advantages and drawbacks, along with the process adopted (from education tools through virtualization tools) are comprehensively explained, including an inquiry-based learning (IBL) methodology for teaching laboratory courses.SampleCourses in Chemistry (cohort size of 100 students), Pharmacy (50 students), Industrial Electronics and Automation Engineering (110 and 30 students) at the University of Alcala.MethodsThe outcomes of the teaching-learning process were evaluated via online tests and rubrics. The impact of online adaptation was assessed by comparing the marks of the different test and the dropout rate in the subjects with those obtained from groups of previous years in the face-to-face mode and feedback from the students. Anonymous survey was conducted to attain a comprehensive understanding of the students' experiences with virtual learning.ResultsThe developed approaches are beneficial for the teaching-learning process and lead to a higher number of students passing the subjects compared to the face-to-face modality. Some challenges students encountered were internet connection, managing workload andovercoming distractions. Nonetheless, most students benefited from the flexibility and better accessibility to the course material, timesaving and relax environment.ConclusionOur findings provided evidence in favor of remote learning. Both students and instructors regard the strategy as very positive. The new methodologies reported herein can be extended to online teaching courses beyond the COVID-19 scenario.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 376
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] E-learning Acceptance in Face-to-Face Universities due to COVID-19
    Estriegana, Rosa
    Medina-Merodio, Jose-Amelio
    Robina-Ramirez, Rafael
    Barchino, Roberto
    De-Pablos-Heredero, Carmen
    SAGE OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [42] MSW Student Experiences in Online vs. Face-to-Face Teaching Formats?
    Okech, David
    Barner, John
    Segoshi, Megan
    Carney, Michelle
    SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION, 2014, 33 (01) : 121 - 134
  • [43] Online vs. Face-to-Face Pedagogical Code Reviews: An Empirical Comparison
    Hundhausen, Christopher
    Agarwal, Pawan
    Trevisan, Michael
    SIGCSE 11: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 42ND ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2011, : 117 - 122
  • [44] Sensing Behaviors of Students in Online vs. Face-to-Face Lecturing Contexts
    Medina, Rebecca
    Carpenter, Daniel
    Geigel, Joe
    Bailey, Reynold
    Wang, Linwei
    Alm, Cecilia O.
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS WORKSHOPS (PERCOM WORKSHOPS), 2018,
  • [45] Face-to-Face vs. Online Asynchronous Teaching in a Conservation Biology Course
    Wells, Carrie N.
    Pass, Michelle B.
    Walsh, Jane E.
    ONLINE LEARNING, 2022, 26 (02): : 241 - 253
  • [46] Online Vs. Face-to-Face: A Comparison of Student Outcomes with Random Assignment
    Arias, J. J.
    Swinton, John
    Anderson, Kay
    E-JOURNAL OF BUSINESS EDUCATION & SCHOLARSHIP OF TEACHING, 2018, 12 (02): : 1 - 23
  • [47] Face-to-Face or Online Learning in Applied Statistics in Health Sciences? Failed Experiment or Opportunity after COVID-19?
    Garcia-Camacha Gutierrez, Irene
    Pozuelo-Campos, Sergio
    Garcia-Camacha Gutierrez, Aurora
    Jimenez-Alcazar, Alfonso
    EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (12):
  • [48] COVID-19: Leapfrogging 8,000 Students from Face-to-Face to Online Learning in Three Weeks
    Prinsloo, Tania
    Singh, Pariksha
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 48 : 71 - 79
  • [49] Remote vs. face-to-face activities in the teaching of renal pathophysiology in the context of social isolation during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic
    Haydar, Ahmed
    Santos, Itamar Souza
    Arcon, Luis Carlos
    Martins, Milton de Arruda
    Tempski, Patricia Zen
    Zatz, Roberto
    ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2023, 47 (04) : 788 - 795
  • [50] Face-to-face and e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A Pakistani dental undergraduates perspective
    Syed, Jammaluddin
    Khan, Erum
    Kayal, Rayyan A.
    Al Amoudi, Ahmed
    Nasir, Muhammad
    Hassan, Nisreen Nabiel
    Alsadi, Fahad Mohammad
    Ali, Saqib
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2024, 78 (03): : 551 - 558