Research on Modeling Weighted Average Temperature Based on the Machine Learning Algorithms

被引:3
|
作者
Li, Kai [1 ]
Li, Li [1 ]
Hu, Andong [2 ]
Pan, Jianping [1 ]
Ma, Yixiang [1 ]
Zhang, Mingsong [1 ]
机构
[1] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Res Ctr Beidou Nav & Environm Remote Sensing, Suzhou 215009, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Colorado, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
machine learning; atmospheric weighted average temperature; Yangtze River Delta; radiosonde; MEAN TEMPERATURE; NEURAL-NETWORK;
D O I
10.3390/atmos14081251
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In response to the nonlinear fitting difficulty of the traditional weighted average temperature (T-m) modeling, this paper proposed four machine learning (ML)-based T-m models. Based on the seven radiosondes in the Yangtze River Delta region from 2014 to 2019, four forecasting ML-based T-m models were constructed using Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Classification and Regression Tree (CART) algorithms. The surface temperature (Ts), water vapor pressure (Es), and atmospheric pressure (Ps) were identified as crucial influencing factors after analyzing their correlations to the T-m. The ML-based T-m models were trained using seven radiosondes from 2014 to 2018. Then, the mean bias and root mean square error (RMSE) of the 2019 dataset were used to evaluate the accuracy of the ML-based T-m models. Experimental results show that the overall accuracy of the LightGBM-based T-m model is superior to the SVM, CART, and RF-based Tm models under different temporal variations. The mean RMSE of the daily LightGBM-based T-m model is reduced by 0.07 K, 0.04 K, and 0.13 K compared to the other three ML-based models, respectively. The mean RMSE of the monthly LightGBM-based T-m model is reduced by 0.09 K, 0.04 K, and 0.11 K, respectively. The mean RMSE of the quarterly LightGBM-based T-m model is reduced by 0.09 K, 0.04 K, and 0.11 K, respectively. The mean bias of the LightGBM-based T-m model is also smaller than that of the other ML-based T-m models. Therefore, the LightGBM-based T-m model can provide more accurate T-m and is more suitable for obtaining GNSS precipitable water vapor in the Yangtze River Delta region.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Research on the Implementation of Financial Risk Control Models and Algorithms Based on Machine Learning
    Fan, Hanwei
    Alenezi, Mamdouh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF E-COLLABORATION, 2024, 20 (01)
  • [22] Research on Fatigue Driving Feature Detection Algorithms of drivers based on machine learning
    Hou Zhongwei
    Ou Shuangjiang
    Xu Dengyuan
    SYSTEMS SCIENCE & CONTROL ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (01) : 167 - 172
  • [23] Is China's Urbanization Inclusive?-Comparative Research Based on Machine Learning Algorithms
    Gao, Zhipeng
    Wang, Zhenyu
    Zhou, Mi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [24] Research on Data Mining of Network Security Hazards Based on Machine Learning Algorithms
    Wu L.
    Yang C.
    Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 2024, 9 (01)
  • [25] Research progress on mixture optimization of concrete based on machine learning and metaheuristic algorithms
    Chen, Yun
    Fu, Qianwang
    Fuhe Cailiao Xuebao/Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2024, 41 (11): : 5689 - 5716
  • [26] Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for groundwater quality modeling
    Soheil Sahour
    Matin Khanbeyki
    Vahid Gholami
    Hossein Sahour
    Irene Kahvazade
    Hadi Karimi
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 46004 - 46021
  • [27] Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for groundwater quality modeling
    Sahour, Soheil
    Khanbeyki, Matin
    Gholami, Vahid
    Sahour, Hossein
    Kahvazade, Irene
    Karimi, Hadi
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (16) : 46004 - 46021
  • [28] Energy Demand Curve Modeling with Machine Learning Algorithms
    Ioanes, Andrei
    Tirnovan, Radu
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2019 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODERN POWER SYSTEMS (MPS), 2019,
  • [29] Machine learning algorithms for analysis and modeling of GeoSpatial data
    Pozdnoukhov, Alexei
    Kanevski, Mikhail
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IAMG '07: GEOMATHEMATICS AND GIS ANALYSIS OF RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT AND HAZARDS, 2007, : 216 - +
  • [30] A comparison of discrete algorithms for fuzzy weighted average
    Chang, Ping-Teng
    Hung, Kuo-Chen
    Lin, Kuo-Ping
    Chang, Ching-Hsiang
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2006, 14 (05) : 663 - 675