Interaction Between Students and Generative Artificial Intelligence in Critical Mineral Inquiry Using Chatbots

被引:0
|
作者
Chung, Sueim [1 ]
Kim, Jeongchan [2 ]
Shin, Donghee [3 ]
机构
[1] Eunhaeng High Sch, Shihung 14916, South Korea
[2] Korea Inst Geosci & Mineral Resources, Daejeon 34132, South Korea
[3] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Sci Educ, Seoul 03760, South Korea
来源
关键词
generative artificial intelligence; Chatbot; Interaction; critical minerals; question types;
D O I
10.5467/JKESS.2023.44.6.675
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This study used a Chatbot, a generative artificial intelligence (AI), to analyze the interaction between the Chatbot and students when exploring critical minerals from an epistemological aspect. The results, issues to be kept in mind in the teaching and learning process using AI were discussed in terms of the role of the teacher, the goals of education, and the characteristics of knowledge. For this study, we conducted a three-session science education program using a Chatbot for 19 high school students and analyzed the reports written by the students. As a result, in terms of form, the students' questions included search-type questions and non-search-type questions, and in terms of content, in addition to various questions asking about the characteristics of the target, there were also questions requiring a judgment by combining various data. In general, students had a questioning strategy that distinguished what they should aim for and what they should avoid. The Chatbot's answer had a certain form and consisted of three parts: an introduction, a body, and a conclusion. In particular, the conclusion included commentary or opinions with opinions on the content, and in this, value judgments and the nature of science were revealed. The interaction between the Chatbot and the student was clearly evident in the process in which the student organized questions in response to the Chatbot's answers. Depending on whether they were based on the answer, independent or derived questions appeared, and depending on the direction of comprehensiveness and specificity, superordinate, subordinate, or parallel questions appeared. Students also responded to the chatbot's answers with questions that included critical thinking skills. Based on these results, we discovered that there are inherent limitations between Chatbots and students, unlike general classes where teachers and students interact. In other words, there is 'limited interaction' and the teacher's role to complement this was discussed, and the goals of learning using AI and the characteristics of the knowledge they provide were also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 692
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparing the "Opinion" of CHATGPT and gemini artificial intelligence CHATBOTS on critical transplant issues focusing on bioethics
    Karakasi, Konstantina
    Karageorgos, Filippos F.
    Neiros, Stavros
    Vasileiadou, Stella
    Kofinas, Athanasios
    Tsakiris, Georgios
    Katsanos, Georgios
    Antoniadis, Nikolaos
    Tsoulfas, Georgios
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 108 (09) : 726 - 726
  • [32] Inquiry and critical thinking skills for the next generation: from artificial intelligence back to human intelligence
    Spector, Jonathan Michael
    Ma, Shanshan
    SMART LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2019, 6 (01)
  • [33] Inquiry and critical thinking skills for the next generation: from artificial intelligence back to human intelligence
    Jonathan Michael Spector
    Shanshan Ma
    Smart Learning Environments, 6
  • [34] Benefits and Challenges of Collaboration between Students and Conversational Generative Artificial Intelligence in Programming Learning: An Empirical Case Study
    Yan, Wanxin
    Nakajima, Taira
    Sawada, Ryo
    EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2024, 14 (04):
  • [35] Examining the differences between how doctors and artificial intelligence chatbots handle patient symptoms
    Amin, Ruhul
    Darwin, Ronald
    Dey, Biplab Kumar
    Dhama, Kuldeep
    Bin Emran, Talha
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 109 (10) : 2892 - 2895
  • [36] Impacts of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Research Trends and Students' Perceptions
    Saude, Sandra
    Barros, Joao Paulo
    Almeida, Ines
    SOCIAL SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 13 (08):
  • [37] Public Health Students and Instructors Weigh in on Generative Artificial Intelligence: Are They on The Same Page?
    Anderson, Olivia S.
    Laubepin, Frederique A.
    August, Ella T.
    PEDAGOGY IN HEALTH PROMOTION, 2024, 10 (03) : 170 - 177
  • [39] DESIGNING A GENERATIVE MENTAL HEALTH CHATBOT USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
    Jacobson, Nicholas C.
    Heinz, Michael
    Kim, Jason
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2021, 55 : S558 - S558
  • [40] The dark side of generative artificial intelligence: A critical analysis of controversies and risks of ChatGPT
    Wach, Krzysztof
    Duong, Cong Doanh
    Ejdys, Joanna
    Kazlauskaite, Rata
    Korzynski, Pawel
    Mazurek, Grzegorz
    Paliszkiewicz, Joanna
    Ziemba, Ewa
    ENTREPRENEURIAL BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2023, 11 (02) : 7 - 30