Context matters in smoking prevention: evaluating smoke-free school hours in Danish vocational schools

被引:1
|
作者
Danielsen, Dina [1 ]
Jensen, Tina S. [1 ,2 ]
Kjeld, Simone G. [1 ]
Bast, Lotus S. [1 ]
Andersen, Susan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Studiestraede 6, DK-1455 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Natl Board Social Serv, Edisonsvej 1, Odense, Denmark
关键词
smoking prevention; implementation; context; process evaluation; vocational school intervention;
D O I
10.1093/heapro/daad030
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Youth is a crucial period for smoking preventive interventions. School-based interventions targeting the policy level and the sociocultural processes of smoking show promising effects in reducing smoking uptake and prevalence. This study presents findings from the qualitative process evaluation of a smoking preventive intervention, Focus, in the vocational school (VET) setting. Specifically, the study focused on contextual factors affecting the implementation of smoke-free school hours (SFSH). Participant observations and focus groups were conducted in four VETs during the implementation period October-December 2018. The data encompass participant observation field notes (n = 21 school days), student focus groups (n = 8) (aged 16-20), teacher focus groups (n = 5) and semi-structured individual interviews with VET leaders (n = 3). The study found that SFSH was not clearly communicated to students due to the educational structure and chaotic rhythm of the school days, ambivalent attitudes among teachers toward enforcement of smoking rules and lack of clear managerial support. The interplay of these factors counteracted the implementation of SFSH in the VET context. The presented contextual factors are important when interpreting the effectiveness of the Focus intervention and for informing future preventive efforts aiming to reduce smoking among youth in high risk of smoking cigarettes. Lay Summary Youth represents a crucial period for smoking prevention. School-based interventions show promising effects in this respect. This study presents findings from the qualitative process evaluation of a smoking preventive intervention, Focus, in the vocational school (VET) setting. The aim was to examine the role of context in the implementation process. The data consist of participant observation field notes (n = 21 school days), focus groups (n = 8 with students and n = 5 with teachers) and semi-structured individual interviews with VET leaders (n = 3). The study found that smoke-free school hours was not clearly communicated to students due to several contextual factors, namely an unclear structure and purpose of the school day, ambivalent attitudes among teachers toward smoking rules and lack of managerial support. These factors are important when interpreting the effectiveness of the Focus intervention and for informing future smoking preventive efforts among youth in high risk of smoking cigarettes.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [21] Changes in the SF-8 scores among healthy non-smoking school teachers after the enforcement of a smoke-free school policy: a comparison by passive smoke status
    Kiyohara, Kosuke
    Itani, Yuri
    Kawamura, Takashi
    Matsumoto, Yoshitaka
    Takahashi, Yuko
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2010, 8
  • [22] Changes in the SF-8 scores among healthy non-smoking school teachers after the enforcement of a smoke-free school policy: a comparison by passive smoke status
    Kosuke Kiyohara
    Yuri Itani
    Takashi Kawamura
    Yoshitaka Matsumoto
    Yuko Takahashi
    [J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8
  • [23] Home-based smoking prevention program Smoke-free Kids on smoking-related cognitions: Secondary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial
    Hiemstra, Marieke
    Engels, Rutger C. M. E.
    van Schayck, Onno C. P.
    Otten, Roy
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2016, 31 (02) : 131 - 146
  • [24] Do school-based tobacco prevention programmes pay off? The cost-effectiveness of the 'smoke-free class competition'
    Hoeflmayr, David
    Hanewinkel, Reiner
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 122 (01) : 34 - 41
  • [25] Evaluating social and behavioural impacts of English smoke-free legislation in different ethnic and age groups implications for reducing smoking-related health inequalities
    Lock, K.
    Adams, E.
    Pilkington, P.
    Duckett, K.
    Gilmore, A.
    Marston, C.
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2010, 19 (05) : 391 - 397
  • [26] Why Secondary Schools Do Not Implement Far-Reaching Smoke-Free Policies: Exploring Deep Core, Policy Core, and Secondary Beliefs of School Staff in the Netherlands
    Schreuders, Michael
    van den Putte, Bas
    Kunst, Anton E.
    Linnansaari, Anu
    Lindfors, Pitjo
    Rimpela, Aria
    Leao, Teresa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2019, 26 (06) : 608 - 618
  • [27] Has Childhood Smoking Reduced Following Smoke-Free Public Places Legislation? A Segmented Regression Analysis of Cross-Sectional UK School-Based Surveys
    Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
    Der, Geoff
    Roberts, Chris
    Haw, Sally
    [J]. NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (07) : 1670 - 1674
  • [28] Op school steek je niks op!Belemmerende en bevorderende factoren bij de overweging om een rookvrij schoolterrein in te voerenSchools as smoke-free zones?Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of outdoor school ground smoking bans at secondary schools
    Andrea D. Rozema
    Jolanda J. P. Mathijssen
    J. A. M. (Hans) van Oers
    Maria W. J. Jansen
    [J]. Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen, 2018, 96 (1) : 23 - 31
  • [29] Why Secondary Schools Do Not Implement Far-Reaching Smoke-Free Policies: Exploring Deep Core, Policy Core, and Secondary Beliefs of School Staff in the Netherlands
    Michael Schreuders
    Bas van den Putte
    Anton E Kunst
    [J]. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2019, 26 : 608 - 618
  • [30] Brief intervention on Smoking, Nutrition, Alcohol and Physical (SNAP) inactivity for smoking relapse prevention after release from smoke-free prisons: a study protocol for a multicentre, investigator-blinded, randomised controlled trial
    Jin, Xingzhong
    Kinner, Stuart A.
    Hopkins, Robyn
    Stockings, Emily
    Courtney, Ryan J.
    Shakeshaft, Anthony
    Petrie, Dennis
    Dobbins, Timothy
    Dolan, Kate
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (10):