A novel 2-phase consensus with customized feedback based group decision-making involving heterogeneous decision-makers

被引:2
|
作者
Singh, Manisha [1 ]
Baranwal, Gaurav [2 ]
Tripathi, Anil Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Banaras Hindu Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Indian Inst Technol, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Banaras Hindu Univ, Inst Sci, Dept Comp Sci, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
来源
JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING | 2023年 / 79卷 / 04期
关键词
Group Decision-making; Consensus reaching process; Feedback mechanism; Heterogeneous decision makers; MINIMUM ADJUSTMENT; MODEL; COST; MECHANISM; INFORMATION; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11227-022-04796-7
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In Group Decision-Making (GDM), decision-makers (DMs) who are experts take wise decisions. But in systems such as smart cities, IoT, and e-democracy, the acceptance and survival of the decision given by the experts depend on the experience of citizens and end-users. Hence, an attempt can be made to use the citizens' perceptions. A potential solution to improve the acceptance and survival of the decision is to include citizens' opinions too in the decision-making. In this work, a novel GDM model is proposed that involves non-experts along with the experts to understand the opinions of non-experts also by the experts. Two phases of the consensus reaching process (CRP) are defined: the inter-consensus reaching phase, where consensus between experts and non-experts will be achieved, and the intra-consensus reaching phase, where the experts negotiate among themselves to attain the consensus. In existing GDM models, CRP overcomes the conflicts in the opinions of the DMs by providing feedback to DMs for modifying their preferences to achieve the required consensus. However, multiple feedback rounds increase the cost of CRP. The proposed GDM gives customized feedback to the experts only once at each phase, reducing the feedback cost in attaining the consensus. A numerical example is discussed to explain the effectiveness of the proposed model. The proposed approach is tested on different consensus thresholds to verify its practicality.
引用
收藏
页码:3936 / 3973
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A scoping review of decision-making tools to support substitute decision-makers for adults with impaired capacity
    King, Seema
    Fernandes, Brooklyn
    Jayme, Timothy S.
    Boryski, Gwenn
    Gaetano, Daniel
    Premji, Zahra
    Venturato, Lorraine
    Santana, Maria J.
    Simon, Jessica
    Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2024, 72 (07) : 2219 - 2231
  • [32] Multi-stage emergency decision-making method with emotion updating mechanism of decision-makers
    Wang Z.-Y.
    Nie H.-F.
    Zhao H.-L.
    [J]. Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2020, 35 (02): : 436 - 444
  • [33] Ethical decision-making: an interactive model of organizations' ethics systems and decision-makers' financial situation
    Kportorgbi, Holy Kwabla
    Aboagye-Otchere, Francis
    Osei, Teddy Kwakye
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY, 2024,
  • [34] A method of hybrid multiple attributes group decision making with risk considering decision-makers' confidence
    Wen, Xingzi
    Ouyang, Junlin
    Liu, Youjin
    [J]. Mathematical and Computational Applications, 2015, 20 (01) : 62 - 75
  • [35] Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Model with Cooperative Behavior Based on Social Network Analysis considering Propagation of Decision-Makers' Preference
    Bai, Shizhen
    He, Hao
    Ge, Mengke
    Yang, Ruobing
    Luo, Dan
    Bi, Xinrui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS, 2022, 2022
  • [36] An adaptive consensus model for multi-criteria sorting under linguistic distribution group decision making considering decision-makers' attitudes
    Tian, Zhang-peng
    Xu, Fu-xin
    Nie, Ru-xin
    Wang, Xiao-kang
    Wang, Jian-qiang
    [J]. INFORMATION FUSION, 2024, 108
  • [37] A Novel Consensus Model For Group Decision-making Problems Based on Discrete Fuzzy Numbers
    Abdennaji, Ines
    Massanet, Sebastia
    Vicente Riera, Juan
    [J]. IEEE CIS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS 2021 (FUZZ-IEEE), 2021,
  • [38] A Novel Tolerance-Based Moderator Guided Heterogeneous Group Decision-Making Involving Experts and End-Users
    Singh, Manisha
    Baranwal, Gaurav
    Tripathi, Anil Kumar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2023, 22 (04) : 1253 - 1288
  • [39] A consensus model for group decision making in heterogeneous contexts
    Martinez, Luis
    Mata, Francisco
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    [J]. APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2006, : 409 - +
  • [40] A novel consensus reaching framework for heterogeneous group decision making based on cumulative prospect theory
    Xu, Weijun
    Huang, Shaoying
    Li, Jia
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 128 : 325 - 335