A Surrogate Modeling Space Definition Method for Efficient Filter Yield Optimization

被引:4
|
作者
Zhang, Zhen [1 ]
Liu, Bo [2 ]
Yu, Yang [3 ]
Imran, Muhammad [2 ]
Cheng, Qingsha S. S. [4 ,5 ]
Yu, Ming [4 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Univ, Sch Elect & Commun Engn, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Glasgow, James Watt Sch Engn, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Natl Space Sci Ctr, Key Lab Microwave Remote Sensing, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[4] Shenzhen Key Lab EM Informat, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China
[5] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Microwave filter; optimization domain; surrogate modeling domain; yield optimization; MICROWAVE; EXTRACTION;
D O I
10.1109/LMWT.2023.3243524
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Surrogate models are widely used in filter yield optimization methods to improve efficiency, which can be divided into online and offline. State-of-the-art offline surrogate model-based filter yield optimization methods are shown to be effective for filter cases with more than ten sensitive design variables. In these methods, a keystone is the appropriate definition of the space for building the surrogate model, deciding success/failure, or at least the efficiency of the yield optimization. However, there is a lack of systematic methods to achieve it. To address this challenge, a new method, called pattern search optimization-based surrogate modeling space definition method (PSOMSD), is proposed. The performance of PSOMSD is demonstrated by a real-world filter case with 14 sensitive design variables. Analysis shows the appropriateness of the defined surrogate modeling space and advantages compared to empirical methods.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 634
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An efficient geometric constraint handling method for surrogate-based aerodynamic shape optimization
    Wang, Kai
    Han, Zhong-Hua
    Zhang, Ke-Shi
    Song, Wen-Ping
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID MECHANICS, 2023, 17 (01)
  • [22] An Efficient Optimization Method for Slow Wave Structures Based on Surrogate Model for TWT Applications
    Zhao, Chen
    Xu, Hang
    Liao, Xiaoyi
    Lin, Wei
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, 2023, 70 (10) : 5335 - 5340
  • [23] AN EFFICIENT METHOD FOR PARAMETRIC YIELD OPTIMIZATION OF MOS INTEGRATED-CIRCUITS
    YU, TK
    KANG, SM
    SACKS, J
    WELCH, WJ
    1989 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN: DIGEST OF TECHNICAL PAPERS, 1989, : 190 - 193
  • [24] Optimization of an efficient hydroponic cultivation method for high yield of strawberry plants
    Sahoo, Suchitrarani
    Sahoo, Dayanidhi
    Sahoo, Khirod Kumar
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2024, 167 : 429 - 440
  • [25] Efficient Gas Leak Simulation Surrogate Modeling and Super Resolution for Gas Detector Placement Optimization
    Lee, Hunggi
    Lee, Donghyeon
    Lee, Jaewook
    Shin, Dongil
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 181
  • [26] An Integrated Optimization Design Method Based on Surrogate Modeling Applied to Diverging Duct Design
    Lu Hanan
    Li Qiushi
    Li Shaobin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TURBO & JET-ENGINES, 2016, 33 (04) : 395 - 405
  • [27] Surrogate Modeling in the Evolutionary Optimization of Catalytic Materials
    Holena, Martin
    Linke, David
    Bajer, Lukas
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 2012, : 1095 - 1102
  • [28] Optimization of traffic forecasting: Intelligent surrogate modeling
    Vlahogianni, Eleni I.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2015, 55 : 14 - 23
  • [29] Surrogate modeling for the fast optimization of energy systems
    Bornatico, Raffaele
    Huessy, Jonathan
    Witzig, Andreas
    Guzzella, Lino
    ENERGY, 2013, 57 : 653 - 662
  • [30] SURROGATE MODEL SELECTION FOR DESIGN SPACE APPROXIMATION AND SURROGATE-BASED OPTIMIZATION
    Williams, B. A.
    Cremaschi, S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER-AIDED PROCESS DESIGN, 2019, 47 : 353 - 358