Cytarabine Plus Etoposideis plus Peg-Rhg-CSF Is More Effective Than Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF As a Stem Cell Mobilization Regimen in Poorly Mobilized MM and Lymphoma

被引:0
|
作者
Cheng, Yixuan [1 ]
Chen, Dong [1 ]
Pei, Renzhi [1 ]
Du, Xiaohong [1 ]
Li, Chen [1 ]
Zhuang, Xianxu [1 ]
Li, Fenglin [1 ]
Ye, Peipei [1 ]
Lu, Ying [2 ]
机构
[1] Ningbo Univ, Affiliated Peoples Hosp, Ningbo, Peoples R China
[2] Yinzhou Peoples Hosp, Dept Hematol, Ningbo, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1182/blood-2023-185595
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] G-CSF Alone vs cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in PBPC mobilization of patients with lymphoma: results depend on degree of previous pretreatment
    G Milone
    S Leotta
    F Indelicato
    S Mercurio
    G Moschetti
    F Di Raimondo
    A Tornello
    U Consoli
    G Guido
    R Giustolisi
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2003, 31 : 747 - 754
  • [32] G-CSF Alone vs cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in PBPC mobilization of patients with lymphoma:: results depend on degree of previous pretreatment
    Milone, G
    Leotta, S
    Indelicato, F
    Mercurio, S
    Moschetti, G
    Di Raimondo, F
    Tornello, A
    Consoli, U
    Guido, G
    Giustolisi, R
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 31 (09) : 747 - 754
  • [33] A Comparison of Chemotherapy plus G-CSF Versus Plerixafor (Mazobil®) plus G-CSF for Stem Cell Mobilization In Patients with Multiple Myeloma Treated with Lenalidomide.
    Mark, Tomer M.
    Rossi, Adriana C.
    Pearse, Roger N.
    Coleman, Morton
    Bernstein, David
    Zafar, Faiza
    Dergis, Usama
    Shore, Tsiporah B.
    Niesvizky, Ruben
    BLOOD, 2010, 116 (21) : 928 - 929
  • [34] Vinorelbine and cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF as mobilisation regimen for patients with multiple myeloma
    Palmieri, S
    Pocali, B
    Copia, C
    Schiavone, EM
    Annunziata, M
    Viola, A
    Ferrara, F
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 33 : S354 - S354
  • [35] Is there any difference in PBPC mobilization between cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF and G-CSF alone in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma?
    Dazzi, C
    Cariello, A
    Rosti, G
    Argnani, M
    Sebastiani, L
    Ferrari, E
    Zornetta, L
    Monti, G
    Nicoletti, P
    Baioni, M
    Salvucci, M
    Scarpi, E
    Marangolo, M
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2000, 39 (3-4) : 301 - 310
  • [36] G-CSF alone or cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF allow comparable mobilization of PBPC in patients affected with lymphoma and not heavily pre-treated.
    Milone, GFG
    Leotta, S
    Mercurio, S
    Indelicato, F
    Moschetti, G
    Di Raimondo, F
    Tornello, A
    Consoli, U
    Guido, G
    Giustolisi, R
    BLOOD, 2002, 100 (11) : 828A - 829A
  • [37] Comparison between mobilization with G-CSF versus G-CSF plus cyclophosphamide based chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer
    Arbona, C
    Mena, F
    Prosper, F
    Benet, I
    Lluch, A
    Garcia-Conde, J
    EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY, 1998, 26 (08) : 780 - 780
  • [38] Superior Stem Cell Mobilization by a Combination of Plerixafor plus G-CSF in Patients with Thalassemia
    Yannaki, Evangelia
    Anagnostopoulos, Achilles
    Karponi, Garyfalia
    Zervou, Fani
    Constantinou, Varnavas
    Psatha, Nikoleta
    Bouinta, Asimina
    Jonlin, Erica
    Papayannopoulou, Thalia
    Stamatoyannopoulos, George
    MOLECULAR THERAPY, 2013, 21 : S11 - S11
  • [39] RESPONSE TO INDUCTION TREATMENT ADAPTED SELECTION OF MOBILIZATION REGIMEN IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA: THE G-CSF ALONE VERSUS HIGH-DOSE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE PLUS G-CSF REGIMEN
    Lee, J. Y.
    Kim, S. J.
    Jang, J. E.
    Suh, C.
    Lee, H.
    Yhim, H. Y.
    Lee, W. S.
    Min, C. K.
    Lee, J. H.
    Kim, J. S.
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2014, 99 : 647 - 648
  • [40] Outcome of stem cell mobilization following G-CSF versus G-CSF plus chemotherapy in adult patients with haematological malignancies
    Ingram, W.
    Powell, D.
    Thompson, S.
    Davies, D.
    Bass, H.
    Thomas, J.
    Al-Ismail, S.
    Sati, H.
    Phillips, S.
    Wilson, K.
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 48 : S124 - S124