Using ecological infrastructure to comprehensively map ecosystem service demand, flow and capacity for spatial assessment and planning

被引:13
|
作者
Perschke, Myriam J. [1 ]
Harris, Linda R. [1 ]
Sink, Kerry J. [1 ,2 ]
Lombard, Amanda T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nelson Mandela Univ, Inst Coastal & Marine Res, POB 77000, ZA-6031 Gqeberha, South Africa
[2] South African Natl Biodivers Inst, Kirstenbosch Res Ctr, ZA-7700 Cape Town, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Causal relationships; Indicators; Social-ecological systems; Sustainable management; Systematic conservation planning; FRESH-WATER; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; SCIENCE; WORLDS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101536
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecosystem services provide substantial benefits to people, but the underlying ecosystems are under unprecedented pressure, compromising service delivery. Therefore, ecosystem services need to be integrated into conservation and management processes to secure their benefits for current and future generations. A key first step is a robust method to map ecosystem services for spatial planning. We aimed to develop and apply a broadly applicable, flexible and spatially accurate method for comprehensive ecosystem services mapping using Ecological Infrastructure, abbreviated to PROPSER. We evaluated the demand, flow, and capacity of three ecosystem services (sports events, recreation, and coastal protection) along the South African coast using causal relationships, including ecological condition of the EI, and approximated EI performance as a measure of its importance to society. This resulted in a high-resolution map of EI performance per service and a cumulative map of multiple-service performance created by integrating the three single-service maps. Altogether, there were 5127 EI sites, with EI close to urban nodes being most important. Post-hoc tests confirmed the spatial accuracy of the output maps, and the sensitivity of PROPSER to the variables and components of the indicator models. PROSPER is a comprehensive and innovative method for mapping ecosystem services that is flexible and can be widely applied. The outputs from this study have been taken up in a national spatial planning process, with several other applications discussed. We identify seven ways in which PROSPER can be advanced, and encourage further testing and application of our approach.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [21] GIS-based assessment of ecosystem service demand concerning green infrastructure line-side vegetation
    Hoerbinger, Stephan
    Immitzer, Markus
    Obriejetan, Michael
    Rauch, Hans Peter
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 121 : 114 - 123
  • [22] Mapping the ecosystem service delivery chain: Capacity, flow, and demand pertaining to aesthetic experiences in mountain landscapes
    Vigl, Lukas Egarter
    Depellegrin, Daniel
    Pereira, Paulo
    de Groot, Rudolf
    Tappeiner, Ulrike
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 574 : 422 - 436
  • [23] Life cycle assessment in road infrastructure planning using spatial geological data
    Caroline Sharmilee Josefin Karlsson
    Sofiia Miliutenko
    Anna Björklund
    Ulla Mörtberg
    Bo Olofsson
    Susanna Toller
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 1302 - 1317
  • [24] Life cycle assessment in road infrastructure planning using spatial geological data
    Karlsson, Caroline Sharmilee Josefin
    Miliutenko, Sofiia
    Bjorklund, Anna
    Mortberg, Ulla
    Olofsson, Bo
    Toller, Susanna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (08): : 1302 - 1317
  • [25] Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Ecosystem Service Values of Watershed and Ecological Compensation Scheme Considering Its Realization in Spatial Planning
    Su, Ziyong
    Wang, Zhanqi
    Zhang, Liguo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [26] Identifying Cross-Regional Ecological Compensation Based on Ecosystem Service Supply, Demand, and Flow for Landscape Management
    Wei, Hejie
    Wu, Jiahui
    Ma, Yu
    Li, Ling
    Yang, Yi
    Liu, Mengxue
    DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2024, 16 (09):
  • [27] PANDORA 3.0 plugin: A new biodiversity ecosystem service assessment tool for urban green infrastructure connectivity planning
    Pelorosso, Raffaele
    Gobattoni, Federica
    Geri, Francesco
    Leone, Antonio
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 26 : 476 - 482
  • [28] Spatial and temporal evolution analysis of ecological security pattern in Hubei Province based on ecosystem service supply and demand analysis
    Wu, Shiyu
    Zhao, Chong
    Yang, Lin
    Huang, Daye
    Wu, Yixiao
    Xiao, Pengnan
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 162
  • [29] Planning Landscape Corridors in Ecological Infrastructure Using Least-Cost Path Methods Based on the Value of Ecosystem Services
    Lee, Jung A.
    Chon, Jinhyung
    Ahn, Changwoo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 6 (11) : 7564 - 7585
  • [30] Delphi-based change assessment in ecosystem service values to support strategic spatial planning in Italian landscapes
    Scolozzi, Rocco
    Morri, Elisa
    Santolini, Riccardo
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 : 134 - 144