Kinetic solubility: Experimental and machine-learning modeling perspectives

被引:0
|
作者
Baybekov, Shamkhal [1 ]
Llompart, Pierre [1 ,2 ]
Marcou, Gilles [1 ]
Gizzi, Patrick [4 ]
Galzi, Jean-Luc [3 ,5 ]
Ramos, Pascal [6 ]
Saurel, Olivier [6 ]
Bourban, Claire [4 ]
Minoletti, Claire [2 ]
Varnek, Alexandre [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strasbourg, Inst Le Bel, Lab Chemoinformat UMR 7140 CNRS, Strasbourg, France
[2] Sanofi, IDD CADD, Vitry Sur Seine, France
[3] Univ Strasbourg, Ecole Super Biotechnol Strasbourg, Biotechnol & Signalisat Cellulaire UMR 7242 CNRS, Illkirch Graffenstaden, France
[4] Univ Strasbourg, Plateforme Chim Biol Integrat Strasbourg UAR 3286, Illkirch Graffenstaden, France
[5] ENSCM 240, ChemBioFrance Chimiotheque Natl UAR 3035, Montpellier, France
[6] Univ Toulouse III Paul Sabatier UT3, Univ Toulouse, Inst Pharmacol & Biol Struct IPBS, CNRS, Toulouse, France
[7] Univ Strasbourg, Inst Le Bel, Lab Chemoinformat UMR 7140 CNRS, 4 Rue Blaise Pascal, F-67081 Strasbourg, France
关键词
comparison; kinetic solubility; QSPR; thermodynamic solubility; DRUG DISCOVERY; FRAGMENT;
D O I
10.1002/minf.202300216
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Kinetic aqueous or buffer solubility is important parameter measuring suitability of compounds for high throughput assays in early drug discovery while thermodynamic solubility is reserved for later stages of drug discovery and development. Kinetic solubility is also considered to have low inter-laboratory reproducibility because of its sensitivity to protocol parameters [1]. Presumably, this is why little efforts have been put to build QSPR models for kinetic in comparison to thermodynamic aqueous solubility. Here, we investigate the reproducibility and modelability of kinetic solubility assays. We first analyzed the relationship between kinetic and thermodynamic solubility data, and then examined the consistency of data from different kinetic assays. In this contribution, we report differences between kinetic and thermodynamic solubility data that are consistent with those reported by others [1, 2] and good agreement between data from different kinetic solubility campaigns in contrast to general expectations. The latter is confirmed by achieving high performing QSPR models trained on merged kinetic solubility datasets. The poor performance of QSPR model trained on thermodynamic solubility when applied to kinetic solubility dataset reinforces the conclusion that kinetic and thermodynamic solubilities do not correlate: one cannot be used as an ersatz for the other. This encourages for building predictive models for kinetic solubility. The kinetic solubility QSPR model developed in this study is freely accessible through the Predictor web service of the Laboratory of Chemoinformatics (). This contribution presents a new publicly available dataset of kinetic solubility for 56k compounds, a comparison of kinetic and thermodynamic measurements and new publicly available QSPR models.image
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modeling of Preparation of Chitosan/Tripolyphosphate Nanoparticles Using Machine-Learning Techniques
    Akbari, Mona
    Akbari, Maryam
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING-INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH EDITION, 2024, 43 (01): : 106 - 118
  • [22] Physics-informed machine-learning for modeling aero-optics
    Kutz, J. Nathan
    Sashidhar, Diya
    Sahba, Shervin
    Brunton, Steven L.
    McDaniel, Austin
    Wilcox, Christopher C.
    APPLIED OPTICAL METROLOGY IV, 2021, 11817
  • [23] Modeling perceived distance among music collections: A machine-learning approach
    Bisesi, Erica
    COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2021, 22 (SUPPL 1) : 12 - 12
  • [24] MACHINE-LEARNING APPROACH TO MODELING OXIDATION OF TOLUENE IN A BUBBLE COLUMN REACTOR
    Tayeb, Raihan
    Zhang, Yuwen
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, IMECE2022, VOL 8, 2022,
  • [25] A machine-learning approach to modeling picophytoplankton abundances in the South China Sea
    Chen, Bingzhang
    Liu, Hongbin
    Xiao, Wupeng
    Wang, Lei
    Huang, Bangqin
    PROGRESS IN OCEANOGRAPHY, 2020, 189
  • [26] A machine-learning approach to modeling picophytoplankton abundances in the South China Sea
    Chen, Bingzhang
    Liu, Hongbin
    Xiao, Wupeng
    Wang, Lei
    Huang, Bangqin
    Progress in Oceanography, 2020, 189
  • [27] New efforts in software, modeling, and machine-learning in the NIST nSoft Consortium
    Martin, Tyler
    Jones, Ronald
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 257
  • [28] A Machine-Learning Framework for Modeling and Predicting Monthly Streamflow Time Series
    Dastour, Hatef
    Hassan, Quazi K.
    HYDROLOGY, 2023, 10 (04)
  • [29] Machine-learning micropattern manufacturing
    Wang, Si
    Shen, Ziao
    Shen, Zhenyu
    Dong, Yuanjun
    Li, Yanran
    Cao, Yuxin
    Zhang, Yanmei
    Guo, Shengshi
    Shuai, Jianwei
    Yang, Yun
    Lin, Changjian
    Chen, Xun
    Zhang, Xingcai
    Huang, Qiaoling
    NANO TODAY, 2021, 38
  • [30] Machine-learning with Cellular Automata
    Povalej, P
    Kokol, P
    Druzovec, TW
    Stiglic, B
    ADVANCES IN INTELLIGENT DATA ANALYSIS VI, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3646 : 305 - 315