A balanced perspective on the contribution of extensive ruminant production to greenhouse gas emissions in southern Africa

被引:5
|
作者
Scholtz, Michiel M. [1 ,2 ]
Jordaan, Frans J. [1 ,2 ]
Chabalala, N. Thuli [1 ,3 ]
Pyoos, Georgette M. [1 ,2 ]
Mamabolo, M. Joel [4 ]
Neser, Frederick W. C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Agr Res Council Anim Prod Anim Breeding & Genet, Irene, South Africa
[2] Univ Free State, Dept Anim Sci, Bloemfontein, South Africa
[3] Univ South Africa, Dept Agr & Anim Hlth, Johannesburg, South Africa
[4] Dept Agr Land Reform & Rural Dev, Pretoria, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
carbon dioxide equivalent emissions; carbon sequestration; climate-smart agriculture; crossbred cattle; global warming potential; land use; methane intensity; mitigation; BEEF; CATTLE; SOILS; DAIRY;
D O I
10.2989/10220119.2022.2155247
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
There is a general perception that ruminants produce large quantities of greenhouse gases (GHG) which contribute to global warming. Ruminant production is also known as the world's largest user of land, and southern Africa is no exception. Recent estimates indicate that livestock are responsible for approximately 4% of the world's GHG emissions through methane production, compared with an initial estimate of 18% by the FAO. Estimates indicate that the total GHG emissions directly related to livestock production in southern Africa did not increase over a period of 20 years, whereas the intensity of livestock-production-related GHG emissions (per kg animal product) was reduced by 40%. This may be the result of increased livestock productivity and breed selection. For instance, increases in the productivity of four indigenous beef cattle breeds decreased the calculated carbon footprint by 7-12%. Recent studies indicated that the methane intensity between beef breeds in South Africa can differ by 44%, and that crossbreeding can have small to moderate effects on the carbon footprint of weaner calf production. Interventions such as the use of indigenous and adapted genotypes, alternative breeding objectives, alternative production systems as well as sustainable management will be key to environmentally friendly livestock production.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 113
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production
    Weiske, A
    Petersen, SO
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 112 (2-3) : 105 - 106
  • [42] Agricultural production, greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential
    Verge, X. P. C.
    De Kimpe, C.
    Desjardins, R. L.
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2007, 142 (2-4) : 255 - 269
  • [43] Growing greenhouse gas emissions due to meat production
    Schwarzer, Stefan
    Witt, Ron
    Zommers, Zinta
    ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 5 : 156 - 163
  • [44] Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from animal production
    Liu, Zifei
    Liu, Yang
    GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 8 (04): : 627 - 638
  • [45] The sunny side of greenhouse gas emissions - quantifying the contribution of aerobic methane production to global methane budgets
    Paul, Nigel D.
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2010, 187 (02) : 263 - 265
  • [46] Shale gas production: potential versus actual greenhouse gas emissions
    O'Sullivan, Francis
    Paltsev, Sergey
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2012, 7 (04):
  • [47] Reply to 'Greenhouse gas emissions from synthetic natural gas production'
    Chi-Jen Yang
    Robert B. Jackson
    Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6 : 221 - 222
  • [48] Reply to 'Greenhouse gas emissions from synthetic natural gas production'
    Yang, Chi-Jen
    Jackson, Robert B.
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2016, 6 (03) : 221 - 222
  • [49] Assessing maize production systems in Mexico from an energy, exergy, and greenhouse-gas emissions perspective
    Juarez-Hernandez, Sergio
    Uson, Sergio
    Sheinbaum Pardo, Claudia
    ENERGY, 2019, 170 : 199 - 211
  • [50] The true extent of agriculture's contribution to national greenhouse gas emissions
    Bell, M. J.
    Cloy, J. M.
    Rees, R. M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2014, 39 : 1 - 12