The major factor of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: Amyloid overload or microcirculation impairment?

被引:1
|
作者
Lu, Jianyao [1 ]
Zhao, Peijun [1 ,2 ]
Qiao, Jinhan [1 ]
Yang, Zhaoxia [1 ]
Tang, Dazhong [1 ]
Zhou, Xiaoyue [3 ]
Huang, Lu [1 ]
Xia, Liming [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Radiol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] First Affiliated Hosp Xiamen Univ, Dept MRI, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[3] Siemens Healthineers Ltd, MR Collaborat, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE | 2023年 / 10卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
cardiac amyloidosis; magnetic resonance imaging; left ventricular systolic dysfunction; amyloid overload; microcirculation impairment; LATE GADOLINIUM ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; ABNORMALITIES; MECHANISMS; DISEASE;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2023.1096130
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeAmyloid overload and microcirculation impairment are both detrimental to left ventricular (LV) systolic function, while it is not clear which factor dominates LV functional remodeling in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA). The purpose of this study was to investigate the major factor of LV systolic dysfunction using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Materials and methodsForty CA patients and 20 healthy controls were included in this study. The CA group was divided into two subgroups by the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): patients with reduced LVEF (LVEF < 50%, rLVEF), and patients with preserved LVEF (LVEF >= 50%, pLVEF). The scanning sequences included cine, native and post-contrast T1 mapping, rest first-pass perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement. Perfusion and mapping parameters were compared among the three groups. Correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between LVEF and mapping parameters, as well as the relationship between LVEF and perfusion parameters. ResultsRemarkably higher native T1 value was observed in the rLVEF patients than the pLVEF patients (1442.2 +/- 85.8 ms vs. 1407.0 +/- 93.9 ms, adjusted p = 0.001). The pLVEF patients showed significantly lower slope dividing baseline signal intensity (slope%BL; rLVEF vs. pLVEF, 55.1 +/- 31.0 vs. 46.2 +/- 22.3, adjusted p = 0.001) and a lower maximal signal intensity subtracting baseline signal intensity (MaxSI-BL; rLVEF vs. pLVEF, 43.5 +/- 23.9 vs. 37.0 +/- 18.6, adjusted p = 0.003) compared to the rLVEF patients. CA patients required more time to reach the maximal signal intensity than the controls did (all adjusted p < 0.01). There was no significant correlation between LVEF and first-pass perfusion parameters, while significant negative correlation was observed between LVEF and native T1 (r = -0.434, p = 0.005) in CA patients. ConclusionAmyloid overload in the myocardial interstitium may be the major factor of LV systolic dysfunction in CA patients, other than microcirculation impairment.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pulse Waveform Analysis in Ocular Microcirculation by Laser Speckle Flowgraphy in Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic and Diastolic Dysfunction
    Shiba, Tomoaki
    Takahashi, Mao
    Matsumoto, Tadashi
    Hori, Yuichi
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR RESEARCH, 2018, 55 (06) : 329 - 337
  • [32] Cardiac resynchronisation therapy reduces systemic inflammation in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular systolic impairment
    Elder, D. H.
    Mohan, M.
    Jagdeep, S.
    Lang, C. C.
    Choy, A. M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 : 57 - 58
  • [33] Predictors of progression to left ventricular systolic dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with borderline left ventricular systolic function
    Lee, Hyun-Jung
    Park, Sang-Shin
    Galimkhan, Nurjanar
    Gwak, Seo-Yeon
    Kim, Kyu
    Cho, Iksung
    Shim, Chi Young
    Ha, Jong-Won
    Hong, Geu-Ru
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 150
  • [34] Left ventricular systolic dysfunction in a cardiac transplant recipient treated with carvedilol
    Gardner, RS
    McGowan, J
    McDonagh, TA
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2002, 4 (03) : 377 - 379
  • [35] Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Myocarditis: Relation with Cardiac MRI Findings
    Oliveira, Silvia
    Pinho, Teresa
    madureira, Antonio J.
    Ramos, Isabel
    Maciel, M. Julia
    CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (02) : E326 - E326
  • [36] Clinical Significance Of Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction After Cardiac Arrest
    Beekman, Rachel
    Kim, Noah
    Faridi, Kamil
    Aneni, Ehimen
    Chang, Tiffany E.
    Arakaki, Andrew
    Kitlen, Eva
    Miller, Elliott
    Khosla, Akhil
    Wira, Charles R.
    Greer, David M.
    Gilmore, Emily J.
    CIRCULATION, 2022, 146
  • [37] Cardiac contractility modulation in left ventricular systolic dysfunction: trick or treat?
    Correale, Michele
    Iacoviello, Massimo
    Brunetti, Natale D.
    Scicchitano, Pietro
    MINERVA CARDIOLOGY AND ANGIOLOGY, 2021, 69 (01) : 12 - 14
  • [38] Coronary reserve impairment and left ventricular systolic dysfunction in hypertensive heart disease
    Frimm, CC
    Pereira, VFA
    Rodrigues, ACT
    Moraes, AV
    Medeiros, CCJ
    Krieger, EM
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1998, 16 : S198 - S198
  • [39] Incidence of ventricular tachydisrythmias in patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Is there a benefit with cardiac resynchronisation therapy?
    Timoteo, A. T.
    Oliveira, M. M.
    Silva, M. N.
    Toste, A.
    Ramos, R.
    Cunha, P. S.
    Feliciano, F.
    Soares, R.
    Santos, S.
    Ferreira, R. C.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 12 (0F) : F122 - F122
  • [40] Cardiac remodelling in association with left ventricular dyssynchrony and systolic dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease
    Hamalainen, Hanna
    Laitinen, Tiina M.
    Hedman, Marja
    Hedman, Antti
    Kivela, Antti
    Laitinen, Tomi P.
    CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING, 2022, 42 (06) : 413 - 421