Administration of methylene blue in septic shock: pros and cons

被引:9
|
作者
Arias-Ortiz, Julian [1 ]
Vincent, Jean-Louis [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Costa Rica, Calderon Guardia Hosp, Dept Intens Care, San Jose, Costa Rica
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Erasme Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Route Lennik 808, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Methylene blue; Vasopressors; Septic shock; Norepinephrine; Nitric oxide; NITRIC-OXIDE SYNTHASE; INFUSION;
D O I
10.1186/s13054-024-04839-w
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Septic shock typically requires the administration of vasopressors. Adrenergic agents remain the first choice, namely norepinephrine. However, their use to counteract life-threatening hypotension comes with potential adverse effects, so that non-adrenergic vasopressors may also be considered. The use of agents that act through different mechanisms may also provide an advantage. Nitric oxide (NO) is the main driver of the vasodilation that leads to hypotension in septic shock, so several agents have been tested to counteract its effects. The use of non-selective NO synthase inhibitors has been of questionable benefit. Methylene blue, an inhibitor of soluble guanylate cyclase, an important enzyme involved in the NO signaling pathway in the vascular smooth muscle cell, has also been proposed. However, more than 25 years since the first clinical evaluation of MB administration in septic shock, the safety and benefits of its use are still not fully established, and it should not be used routinely in clinical practice until further evidence of its efficacy is available.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Effects of methylene blue in septic shock - Reply
    Groeneveld, ABJ
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (06) : 1094 - 1094
  • [12] PROS AND CONS OF CLOFIBRATE ADMINISTRATION
    SCHMIDT, J
    SCHWEIZERISCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1987, 117 (20) : 773 - 776
  • [13] HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE TO METHYLENE BLUE FOR REFRACTORY SEPTIC SHOCK
    Wilson, Jennifer
    Dillon, Michelle
    Mcpherson, Danielle
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2025, 53 (01)
  • [14] Outcomes of methylene blue treatment in severe septic shock
    Sang, J.
    Alapati, A.
    Nugent, K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2025, 369 : S527 - S528
  • [15] Does methylene blue administration to septic shock patients affect vascular permeability and blood volume?
    Donati, A
    Conti, G
    Loggi, S
    Münch, C
    Coltrinari, R
    Pelaia, P
    Pietropaoli, P
    Preiser, JC
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 30 (10) : 2271 - 2277
  • [16] Methylene blue administration in refractory distributive shock
    Porizka, M.
    Riha, H.
    Balik, M.
    ANESTEZIOLOGIE A INTENZIVNI MEDICINA, 2021, 32 (4-5): : 211 - 216
  • [17] PROS AND CONS OF CLOFIBRATE ADMINISTRATION - COMMENT
    HARTMANN, G
    NOSEDA, G
    STAHELIN, H
    SCHWEIZERISCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1987, 117 (20) : 777 - 778
  • [18] Intravitreal administration of bevacizumab: pros and cons
    Simin Dashti-Khavidaki
    Mohammad Abdollahi
    DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 23
  • [19] Intravitreal administration of bevacizumab: pros and cons
    Dashti-Khavidaki, Simin
    Abdollahi, Mohammad
    DARU-JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 23
  • [20] The potential of methylene blue in treating septic shock: Is it worth a shot?
    Shariq, Salva
    Khawaja, Areej
    Khowaja, Nima
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 74 (03) : 602 - 602