Enhancing Deep Learning Soil Moisture Forecasting Models by Integrating Physics-based Models

被引:5
|
作者
Li, Lu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dai, Yongjiu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wei, Zhongwang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wei, Shangguan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wei, Nan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Yonggen [4 ]
Li, Qingliang [5 ]
Li, Xian-Xiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Atmospher Sci, Guangzhou 510275, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab Zhuhai, Guangzhou 510275, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Prov Key Lab Climate Change & Nat Disast, Guangzhou 510275, Peoples R China
[4] Tianjin Univ, Inst Surface Earth Syst Sci, Sch Earth Syst Sci, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[5] Changchun Normal Univ, Coll Comp Sci & Technol, Changchun 130123, Peoples R China
关键词
soil moisture forecasting; hybrid model; deep learning; ConvLSTM; attention mechanism; IN-SITU; SURFACE; INDEX; SATELLITE;
D O I
10.1007/s00376-023-3181-8
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Accurate soil moisture (SM) prediction is critical for understanding hydrological processes. Physics-based (PB) models exhibit large uncertainties in SM predictions arising from uncertain parameterizations and insufficient representation of land-surface processes. In addition to PB models, deep learning (DL) models have been widely used in SM predictions recently. However, few pure DL models have notably high success rates due to lacking physical information. Thus, we developed hybrid models to effectively integrate the outputs of PB models into DL models to improve SM predictions. To this end, we first developed a hybrid model based on the attention mechanism to take advantage of PB models at each forecast time scale (attention model). We further built an ensemble model that combined the advantages of different hybrid schemes (ensemble model). We utilized SM forecasts from the Global Forecast System to enhance the convolutional long short-term memory (ConvLSTM) model for 1-16 days of SM predictions. The performances of the proposed hybrid models were investigated and compared with two existing hybrid models. The results showed that the attention model could leverage benefits of PB models and achieved the best predictability of drought events among the different hybrid models. Moreover, the ensemble model performed best among all hybrid models at all forecast time scales and different soil conditions. It is highlighted that the ensemble model outperformed the pure DL model over 79.5% of in situ stations for 16-day predictions. These findings suggest that our proposed hybrid models can adequately exploit the benefits of PB model outputs to aid DL models in making SM predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:1326 / 1341
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Spatial Clustering of Aftershocks Impacts the Performance of Physics-Based Earthquake Forecasting Models
    Hardebeck, Jeanne L.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2021, 126 (02)
  • [22] Heterogeneous computing in physics-based models
    Bruaset, Are Magnus
    Cai, Xing
    Desprez, Frederic
    Parsons, Mark
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2023, 11
  • [23] Physics-based models for photonic thermometers
    Ahmed, Zeeshan
    SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL, 2022, 348
  • [24] Enhancing Traditional Building Energy Model Calibration with Physics-based Inverse Models
    Li, Han
    Hong, Tianzhen
    Sofos, Marina
    ASHRAE TRANSACTIONS 2019, VOL 125, PT 2, 2019, 125 : 99 - 101
  • [25] Performance enhancing techniques for deep learning models in time series forecasting
    Fang, Xing
    Yuan, Zhuoning
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 85 : 533 - 542
  • [26] Real-time analysis and forecasting of the microseismic cloud size: Physics-based models versus machine learning
    Andrade, Jorge Nustes
    van der Baan, Mirko
    GEOPHYSICS, 2021, 86 (06) : KS175 - KS186
  • [27] Smart overlay metrology pairing adaptive deep learning with the physics-based models used by a lithographic apparatus
    Hwang, Chan
    Lee, Seung Yoon
    Oh, SeungHwa
    Schmitt-Weaver, Emil
    Park, Jeonghyun
    Park, Daniel
    El Kodadi, Mohamed
    Bhattacharyya, Kaustuve
    OPTICAL MICROLITHOGRAPHY XXXI, 2018, 10587
  • [28] Designing the next generation of polymers with machine learning and physics-based models
    Chew, Alex K.
    Afzal, Mohammad Atif Faiz
    Chandrasekaran, Anand
    Kamps, Jan Henk
    Ramakrishnan, Vaidya
    MACHINE LEARNING-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 5 (04):
  • [29] Learning Action Failure Models from Interactive Physics-based Simulations
    Haidu, Andrei
    Kohlsdorf, Daniel
    Beetz, Michael
    2015 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS), 2015, : 5370 - 5375
  • [30] On interacting with physics-based models of graphical objects
    Payandeh, S
    Dill, J
    Cai, ZL
    ROBOTICA, 2004, 22 : 223 - 230