Implementation of ask-advise-connect for smoking cessation in Dutch general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods evaluation using the CFIR framework

被引:0
|
作者
van Westen-Lagerweij, Naomi A. [1 ,2 ]
Willemsen, Marc C. [1 ,2 ]
Croes, Esther A. [1 ]
Chavannes, Niels H. [3 ,4 ]
Meijer, Eline [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Expertise Ctr Tobacco Control, Trimbos Inst, POB 725, NL-3500 AS Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Hlth Promot, POB 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Publ Hlth & Primary Care, POB 9600, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Natl Ehlth Living Lab, POB 9600, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Ask-Advise-Connect; Implementation; General practice; COVID-19; pandemic; Mixed-methods;
D O I
10.1186/s13011-023-00535-0
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe Ask-Advise-Connect (AAC) approach can help primary care providers to increase the number of people who attempt to quit smoking and enrol into cessation counselling. We implemented AAC in Dutch general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study we describe how AAC was received in Dutch general practice and assess which factors played a role in the implementation.MethodsA mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate the implementation of AAC. Implementation took place between late 2020 and early 2022 among 106 Dutch primary care providers (general practitioners (GPs), practice nurses and doctor's assistants). Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through four online questionnaires. A descriptive analysis was conducted on the quantitative data. The qualitative data (consisting of answers to open-ended questions) were inductively analysed using axial codes. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to structure and interpret findings.ResultsDuring the study, most participants felt motivated (84-92%) and able (80-94%) to apply AAC. At the end of the study, most participants reported that the AAC approach is easy to apply (89%) and provides advantages (74%). Routine implementation of the approach was, however, experienced to be difficult. More GPs (30-48%) experienced barriers in the implementation compared to practice nurses and doctor's assistants (7-9%). The qualitative analysis showed that especially external factors, such as a lack of time or priority to discuss smoking due to the COVID-19 pandemic, negatively influenced implementation of AAC.ConclusionsAlthough AAC was mostly positively received in Dutch general practice, implementation turned out to be challenging, especially for GPs. Lack of time to discuss smoking was a major barrier in the implementation. Future efforts should focus on providing additional implementation support to GPs, for example with the use of e-health.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Frontline nurses' willingness to work during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-methods study
    Ke, Qiaohong
    Chan, Sally Wai-chi
    Kong, Yue
    Fu, Jianguo
    Li, Wengang
    Shen, Qu
    Zhu, Jiemin
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2021, 77 (09) : 3880 - 3893
  • [22] Anxiety in People With Multiple Sclerosis During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Survey
    Fahy, Austin
    Maguire, Rebecca
    REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 69 (02) : 118 - 128
  • [23] An evaluation of the national testing response during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a multistage mixed-methods study protocol
    Naidoo, Reshania
    Lambert, Ben
    Voysey, Merryn
    Shretta, Rima
    Keene, Claire Marriott
    Wanat, Marta
    Andersen-Waine, Billie
    Dahal, Prabin
    Stepniewska, Kasia
    Hounsell, Rachel
    Molyneux, Sassy
    Pinto-Duschinsky, Sarah
    Rowe, Emily
    Yenidogan, Gulsen
    Fowler, Tom
    White, Lisa
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (06):
  • [24] Implementing the MIRROR-TCM Randomised Control Trial During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation
    Mchugh, Molly
    Hirschman, Karen B.
    Toles, Mark P.
    Ahrens, Monica
    Morgan, Brianna
    Osokpo, Onome
    Shaid, Elizabeth C.
    Mccauley, Kathleen
    Hanlon, Alexandra L.
    Pauly, Mark V.
    Naylor, Mary D.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2024,
  • [25] COVID-19 vaccinations and counselling: a mixed-methods survey of Australian general practice in July 2021
    O'Brien, Kathleen
    Barnes, Katelyn
    Hall Dykgraaf, Sally
    Douglas, Kirsty A.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2022, 28 (05) : 399 - 407
  • [26] A Mixed-Methods Study of Experiences During Pregnancy Among Black Women During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Dove-Medows, Emily
    Davis, Jean
    McCracken, Lindsey
    Lebo, Lauren
    Misra, Dawn P.
    Giurgescu, Carmen
    Kavanaugh, Karen
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL & NEONATAL NURSING, 2022, 36 (02) : 161 - 172
  • [27] Older adults' coping strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic - a longitudinal mixed-methods study
    Kastner, Lydia
    Suenkel, Ulrike
    Eschweiler, Gerhard W.
    Dankowski, Theresa
    von Thaler, Anna-Katharina
    Mychajliw, Christian
    Brockmann, Kathrin
    Maetzler, Walter
    Berg, Daniela
    Fallgatter, Andreas J.
    Heinzel, Sebastian
    Thiel, Ansgar
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [28] Continuity of care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Qualitative results from a mixed-methods study
    Deml, M.
    Jungo, K.
    Rachamin, Y.
    Gicquel, F.
    Dubois, M.
    Bertato, S.
    Dubois, J.
    Senn, O.
    Streit, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 31
  • [29] Correction to: Experiences with Telemedicine for HIV Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Dini Harsono
    Yanhong Deng
    Sangyun Chung
    Lydia A. Barakat
    Gerald Friedland
    Jaimie P. Meyer
    Elizabeth Porter
    Merceditas Villanueva
    Michael S. Wolf
    Jessica E. Yager
    E. Jennifer Edelman
    AIDS and Behavior, 2023, 27 : 2054 - 2054
  • [30] Emergency Medicine Influencers' Twitter Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-methods Analysis
    Leibowitz, Maren K.
    Scudder, Michael R.
    McCabe, Meghan
    Chan, Jennifer L.
    Klein, Matthew R.
    Trueger, N. Seth
    McCarthy, Danielle M.
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (03) : 710 - 718