Implementation of ask-advise-connect for smoking cessation in Dutch general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods evaluation using the CFIR framework

被引:0
|
作者
van Westen-Lagerweij, Naomi A. [1 ,2 ]
Willemsen, Marc C. [1 ,2 ]
Croes, Esther A. [1 ]
Chavannes, Niels H. [3 ,4 ]
Meijer, Eline [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Expertise Ctr Tobacco Control, Trimbos Inst, POB 725, NL-3500 AS Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Hlth Promot, POB 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Publ Hlth & Primary Care, POB 9600, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Natl Ehlth Living Lab, POB 9600, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Ask-Advise-Connect; Implementation; General practice; COVID-19; pandemic; Mixed-methods;
D O I
10.1186/s13011-023-00535-0
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe Ask-Advise-Connect (AAC) approach can help primary care providers to increase the number of people who attempt to quit smoking and enrol into cessation counselling. We implemented AAC in Dutch general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study we describe how AAC was received in Dutch general practice and assess which factors played a role in the implementation.MethodsA mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate the implementation of AAC. Implementation took place between late 2020 and early 2022 among 106 Dutch primary care providers (general practitioners (GPs), practice nurses and doctor's assistants). Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through four online questionnaires. A descriptive analysis was conducted on the quantitative data. The qualitative data (consisting of answers to open-ended questions) were inductively analysed using axial codes. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to structure and interpret findings.ResultsDuring the study, most participants felt motivated (84-92%) and able (80-94%) to apply AAC. At the end of the study, most participants reported that the AAC approach is easy to apply (89%) and provides advantages (74%). Routine implementation of the approach was, however, experienced to be difficult. More GPs (30-48%) experienced barriers in the implementation compared to practice nurses and doctor's assistants (7-9%). The qualitative analysis showed that especially external factors, such as a lack of time or priority to discuss smoking due to the COVID-19 pandemic, negatively influenced implementation of AAC.ConclusionsAlthough AAC was mostly positively received in Dutch general practice, implementation turned out to be challenging, especially for GPs. Lack of time to discuss smoking was a major barrier in the implementation. Future efforts should focus on providing additional implementation support to GPs, for example with the use of e-health.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implementation of ask-advise-connect for smoking cessation in Dutch general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods evaluation using the CFIR framework
    Naomi A. van Westen-Lagerweij
    Marc C. Willemsen
    Esther A. Croes
    Niels H. Chavannes
    Eline Meijer
    Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 18
  • [2] The delivery of Ask-Advise-Connect for smoking cessation in Dutch general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of a pre-post implementation study
    van Westen-Lagerweij, Naomi A.
    Willemsen, Marc C.
    Croes, Esther A.
    Chavannes, Niels H.
    Meijer, Eline
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [3] The delivery of Ask-Advise-Connect for smoking cessation in Dutch general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of a pre-post implementation study
    Naomi A. van Westen-Lagerweij
    Marc C. Willemsen
    Esther A. Croes
    Niels H. Chavannes
    Eline Meijer
    BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [4] The implementation of ask-advise-connect in a federally qualified health center: a mixed methods evaluation using the re-aim framework
    Shorey Fennell, Bethany
    Cottrell-Daniels, Cherell
    Hoover, Diana Stewart
    Spears, Claire A.
    Nguyen, Nga
    Pineiro, Barbara
    McNeill, Lorna H.
    Wetter, David W.
    Vidrine, Damon J.
    Vidrine, Jennifer, I
    TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (08) : 551 - 560
  • [5] General Practice in the Time of COVID-19: A Mixed-Methods Service Evaluation of a Primary Care COVID-19 Service
    Hibberd, James
    Carter, Jessica
    McCoy, Michaella
    Rafiq, Meena
    Varma, Amita
    Sanghera, Rita
    Matthews, Philippa
    Rait, Greta
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (06) : 1 - 11
  • [6] Mixed-Methods Study of the Experience of Pregnancy During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    LoGiudice, Jenna A.
    Bartos, Susan
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2022, 51 (05): : 548 - 557
  • [7] Experiences of Nurses During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study
    LoGiudice, Jenna A.
    Bartos, Susan
    AACN ADVANCED CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 32 (01) : 14 - 26
  • [8] Implementation of Virtual, Livestream Yoga Classes for Veterans at Home During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Program Evaluation
    Pham, Catherine
    Hildebrand, Caitlin
    Tarasovsky, Gary
    Purcell, Natalie
    Seal, Karen
    Nicosia, Francesca
    GLOBAL ADVANCES IN INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE AND HEALTH, 2024, 13
  • [9] Interfacility Patient Transfers During COVID-19 Pandemic:Mixed-Methods Study
    Henry, Michael B.
    Funsten, Emily
    Michealson, Marisa A.
    Albright, Danielle
    Crandall, Cameron S.
    Sklar, David P.
    George, Naomi
    Greenwood-Ericksen, Margaret
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 25 (05)
  • [10] A mixed-methods analysis of telehealth implementation in nursing homes amidst the COVID-19 pandemic
    Powell, Kimberly R.
    Winkler, Amy E.
    Liu, Jianfang
    Alexander, Gregory L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2022, 70 (12) : 3493 - 3502