Immediate implantable loop recorder implantation for detecting atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke

被引:4
|
作者
Dulai, Rajdip [1 ]
Hunt, Jacqui [1 ]
Veasey, Rick A. [1 ]
Biyanwila, Chemindra [2 ]
O'Neill, Barbora [2 ]
Patel, Nikhil [1 ]
机构
[1] East Sussex Hosp NHS Trust, Eastbourne Dist Gen Hosp, Cardiol Res Dept, Kings Dr, Eastbourne BN21 2UD, England
[2] East Sussex Hosp NHS Trust, Eastbourne Dist Gen Hosp, Dept Stroke Med, Kings Dr, Eastbourne BN21 2UD, England
来源
关键词
ILR implantation; Cryptogenic stroke; Implantable loop recorder; Atrial fibrillation; INSERTABLE CARDIAC MONITOR; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.106988
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is suspected as the main cause of stroke in the majority of patients presenting with cryptogenic stroke (CS). Implantable loop recorders (ILR's) are indicated for detecting AF in these patients. The short term (<1 month) and long-term AF detection rates in patients inserted with an ILR immediately after CS is reported. Secondly, we compare the safety of nurse led vs physician led ILR implantation in these patients. Methods: This is a ret-rospective review of all patients who underwent inpatient ILR implantation (Med-tronic Linq) between May 2020 and May 2022 at East Sussex Healthcare NHS trust. All patients were remotely monitored via the FOCUSONTM monitoring and triage service. Results: A total of 186 subjects were included in the study and were fol-lowed up for a mean period of 363.0 +/-222.6 days. The mean time between stroke and ILR was 7.0 +/-5.5 days. The mean time between referral and ILR was 1.0 +/-2.0 days. AF was detected in 25 (13.4%) patients. During the first 30 days of monitoring, AF was detected in 9 (4.8%) patients. The number of ILR implants performed by the specialist nurse was 107 (57.5%). There was no significant difference in the major complication rate (requiring device removal) between nurse and physician led implant (1 (0.95%) vs 0 (0%), p value = 0.389). Conclusion: Inpatient ILR for cryptogenic stroke is feasible. The rate of AF detection in the first month post CS is 4.8% however, more AF was detected up to one year post implant, suggesting rationale for proceeding directly to ILR implant in these patients before discharge to not delay treatment. A nurse led ser-vice is also viable with no significant difference in the major complication rate com-pared to physician led implants.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ROLE OF IMPLANTABLE LOOP RECORDER IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
    Thapamagar, S. B.
    Rakhshan, E.
    Sooklal, S.
    Mascarenhas, D. A.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 125 : 333 - 333
  • [22] Implantable Loop Recorders Change Management in Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke With or Without Atrial Fibrillation
    Fu, Danni
    Jones, Richard
    Dai, Xing
    Wu, Michael
    Burton, Tina
    CIRCULATION, 2020, 142
  • [23] Implantable loop recorder detection of atrial fibrillation to prevent stroke ( The LOOP Study): a randomised controlled trial
    Svendsen, Jesper H.
    Diederichsen, Soren Z.
    Hojberg, Soren
    Krieger, Derk W.
    Graff, Claus
    Kronborg, Christian
    Olesen, Morten S.
    Nielsen, Jonas B.
    Holst, Anders G.
    Brandes, Axel
    Haugan, Ketil J.
    Kober, Lars
    LANCET, 2021, 398 (10310): : 1507 - 1516
  • [24] Accuracy of Implantable Loop Recorder for Detecting Atrial Fibrillation Early Recurrence After Catheter Ablation
    Cho, Hyun Jun
    Kim, Yoon Nyun
    Han, Seongwook
    Park, Hyoung-Seob
    Jun, Seung-Woon
    Choi, Sang-Woong
    Bae, Han-Jun
    Kim, In-Cheol
    Cho, Yun-Kyeong
    Yoon, Hyuck-Jun
    Kim, Hyungseop
    Nam, Chang-Wook
    Hur, Seung-Ho
    Kang, Na Young
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 136
  • [25] Surveillance for atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke using an implantable loop recorder in a community hospital setting: real world validation of Crystal AF
    Seiler, A.
    Allred, J.
    Biby, S.
    Sethi, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2015, 22 : 98 - 98
  • [26] Implantable loop recorder in atrial fibrillation and after catheter ablation
    Fikenzer K.
    Dagres N.
    Hindricks G.
    Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie, 2016, 27 (4) : 355 - 359
  • [27] Role of the implantable loop recorder in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation
    Montenero, AS
    Quayyum, A
    Franciosa, P
    Mangiameli, D
    Antonelli, A
    Dell'Orto, M
    Vimercati, M
    Bruno, N
    Zumbo, F
    NEW ADVANCES IN HEART FAILURE AND ATRIAL FIBRILLATION, 2003, : 305 - 316
  • [28] Meta-Analysis of Implantable Loop Recorder for Atrial Fibrillation Detection in Patients With Ischemic Stroke
    Kheiri, Babikir
    Sanghai, Saket
    Alhamoud, Hani
    Osman, Mohammed
    Stecker, Eric
    Henrikson, Charles A.
    Nazer, Babak
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 161 : 115 - 116
  • [29] Predictors of atrial fibrillation detection in embolic stroke of undetermined source patients with implantable loop recorder
    D'Anna, Lucio
    La Cava, Roberta
    Khetarpal, Ashni
    Karjikar, Abeer
    Almohtadi, Ahmad
    Romoli, Michele
    Foschi, Matteo
    Ornello, Raffaele
    De Santis, Federico
    Sacco, Simona
    Abu-Rumeileh, Samir
    Lorenzut, Simone
    Pavoni, Daisy
    Valente, Mariarosaria
    Merlino, Giovanni
    Almeida, Soraia
    Barnard, Asha
    Guan, Jianqun
    Banerjee, Soma
    Lim, Phang Boon
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [30] Predictors of atrial fibrillation on implantable cardiac monitoring for cryptogenic stroke
    Desai, Amar D.
    Howe, Emily
    Coromilas, Ellie
    Zhang, Yiyi
    Dizon, Jose M.
    Willey, Joshua
    Biviano, Angelo B.
    Garan, Hasan
    Wan, Elaine Y.
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 65 (01) : 7 - 14