Open educational resources (OER) and some of the United Nations sustainable development goals

被引:0
|
作者
Ossiannilsson, Ebba [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Int Council Open & Distance Educ, ICDE, Lund, Sweden
[2] Ossiannilsson Qual Open Online Learning QOOL Consu, Lund, Sweden
[3] Swedish Assoc Open Flexible & Distance Educ, Lund, Sweden
关键词
Equity; Human rights; Liberation; Micro-credentials; OER; Open education; SDG; Quality; Social contract; Social justice;
D O I
10.1108/IJILT-01-2023-0002
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
PurposeThe United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization's (UNESCO) Recommendation on Open Educational Resources (OER) was a milestone when it was uniformly adopted by its member states on November 25, 2019. The purpose of this conceptual paper is to provide an overview of the OER Recommendation in relation to some of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The paper focuses on SDG 4 on education, but also on other SDGs that are directly linked to the relevant SDGs for the overall implementation of the UNESCO OER Recommendation. These SDGs are: SDG 5 (gender equality), SDG 9 (industry, innovation and infrastructure), SDG 10 (reduce inequalities within and between countries), SDG 16 (peace, justice and strong institutions), and SDG 17 (partnerships for the goals). All five areas of the OER recommendation are closely linked to the above SDGs. This paper also discusses how to advocate with stakeholders at all levels to implement and mainstream OER and the SDGs across all areas of the OER recommendation. In addition, this concept paper discusses accessibility for all (e.g. any type of impairment/disability, etc.) and addresses quality issues at OER and their implications.Design/methodology/approachThis conceptual paper provides an overview of the UNESCO OER Recommendation and its relationship to some of the SDGs. The paper also addresses the role of stakeholders in implementing the OER Recommendation and the potential problems of its accessibility and quality. This paper has been designed as a literature review including mainly official reports from the organizations in the field, such as the UN UNESCO SDGs (UN, n.d; UNESCO, 2016) and the UNESCO OER Recommendation (UNESCO, 2019, 2021a). This conceptual paper is discursive in nature. It contains a discussion based on a literature review comparative studies, experiences, works, and reflections of the author, who has been working in this field since its beginnings in 2002. This contribution is also based on the experiences, works, and reflections of other authors on the OER movement.FindingsThe UNESCO OER Recommendation (UNESCO, 2019) clarifies that all five areas of the OER Recommendation for implementation are closely linked to the SDGs (UN, n.d; UNESCO, 2016), particularly SDG4, which targets to achieve education for all by 2030, and other SDGs, such as SDG5 (gender equality), SDG9 (industry, innovation, and infrastructure), SDG10 (reducing inequalities within and between countries), SDG16 (peace, justice, and strong institutions), and SDG17 (partnerships for the goals). Since OER does not consist of a single goal but is linked to universal values, such as the common good, human rights (United Nations, 1948), equality, ethics, and social justice, this concept paper discusses how they are interconnected and how both the SDGs and the five domains of the UNESCO OER Recommendation (UNESCO, 2019) can be achieved. To date, however, there have been few studies on how they are interconnected. This paper proposes a model that highlights their relationships as two sides of the same coin, as they are interconnected and influence, facilitate, and reinforce each other.Research limitations/implicationsThe study presented in this concept paper may have limitations as it is mainly based on a review of the official relevant literature by UNESCOan OECD. A large-scale study relying on more comprehensive methods, such as focus groups, grounded theory, or even other qualitative and quantitative methods, could have validated the findings. However, since this is a first attempt, and there are few, if any studies in this area, it was decided to conduct the study in the form of a literature review and with a personal approach based on more than 20 years of research, experience, and consultation in the area of open education, OER, human rights (United Nations, 1948), social justice, ethics, and the common good.Practical implicationsThe practical impact of the findings of this conceptual paper is that by breaking down the broad SDG goals to a practical level, it shows how the SDGs can be part of daily life and seamless daily education and learning throughout the lifespan of the learners.Social implicationsThe higher values of the SDGs relate to human rights United Nations (1948), social justice, and equity. Several of the SDGs, including SDG 4 and others addressed in the UNESCO OER Recommendation, such as the following: SDG5 (gender equality), SDG9 (industry, innovation, and infrastructure), SDG10 (reduce inequalities within and between countries), SDG16 (peace, justice, and strong institutions), and SDG17 (partnerships for the goals) can be achieved through open education (Inamorato Dos Santos et al., 2016), Achieving these SDGs and implementing the OER Recommendation will benefit both individuals and the planet. Education for all will also help solv climate problems.Originality/valueThe OER Recommendation (UNESCO, 2019) clarifies that all five areas of its implementation are closely linked to the SDGs, particularly SDG4, which targets education for all by 2030 (OECD, 2009; UNESCO, 2016), as well as SDG5 (gender equality), SDG9 (industry, innovation, and infrastructure), SDG10 (reducing inequalities within and between countries), SDG16 (peace, justice, and strong institutions), and SDG17 (partnerships for the goals). Since OER is not a stand-alone goal but is related to overarching values, such as human rights (United Nations (1948), equity, and social justice, this conceptual paper explores how these are interconnected and how both the SDGs and the five goals can be achieved. The proposed model is new and clearly needed in research on this topic.
引用
收藏
页码:548 / 561
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ICAO and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
    Klenka, Michal
    [J]. EDAMBA 2018: INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE FOR DOCTORAL STUDENTS AND POST-DOCTORAL SCHOLARS: CAPACITY AND RESOURCES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: THE ROLE OF ECONOMICS, BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT AND RELATED DISCIPLINES, 2018, : 238 - 246
  • [2] Managing marine living resources of India in the context of United Nations sustainable development goals
    Smitha, B. R.
    Devi, C. R. Asha
    Manjebrayakath, Hashim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDIAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 2022, 26 (04): : 292 - 314
  • [3] Massive Open Online Courses Role in Promoting United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
    Wang, Yuyue
    Li, Yidan
    Hu, Xiaodong
    Xu, Yuegiang
    Liang, Xinyi.
    Lei, Chi-Un
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2022 IEEE LEARNING WITH MOOCS (IEEE LWMOOCS VIII 2022): THE 4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION: FROM THE PANDEMIC TO THE REMOTE WORLD, 2022, : 126 - 130
  • [5] SETAC Focus on United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals
    Menzie, Charlie
    [J]. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 16 (01) : 4 - 5
  • [6] Linking fire and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
    Martin, Deborah A.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 662 : 547 - 558
  • [7] The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: An IFAC Agenda
    Khargonekar, Pramod P.
    Samad, Tariq
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2024, 58 (03): : 153 - 158
  • [8] Citizen science and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
    Fritz, Steffen
    See, Linda
    Carlson, Tyler
    Haklay, Mordechai
    Oliver, Jessie L.
    Fraisl, Dilek
    Mondardini, Rosy
    Brocklehurst, Martin
    Shanley, Lea A.
    Schade, Sven
    Wehn, Uta
    Abrate, Tommaso
    Anstee, Janet
    Arnold, Stephan
    Billot, Matthew
    Campbell, Jillian
    Espey, Jessica
    Gold, Margaret
    Hager, Gerid
    He, Shan
    Hepburn, Libby
    Hsu, Angel
    Long, Deborah
    Maso, Joan
    McCallum, Ian
    Muniafu, Maina
    Moorthy, Inian
    Obersteiner, Michael
    Parker, Alison J.
    Weissplug, Maike
    West, Sarah
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 2 (10) : 922 - 930
  • [9] Citizen science and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
    Steffen Fritz
    Linda See
    Tyler Carlson
    Mordechai (Muki) Haklay
    Jessie L. Oliver
    Dilek Fraisl
    Rosy Mondardini
    Martin Brocklehurst
    Lea A. Shanley
    Sven Schade
    Uta Wehn
    Tommaso Abrate
    Janet Anstee
    Stephan Arnold
    Matthew Billot
    Jillian Campbell
    Jessica Espey
    Margaret Gold
    Gerid Hager
    Shan He
    Libby Hepburn
    Angel Hsu
    Deborah Long
    Joan Masó
    Ian McCallum
    Maina Muniafu
    Inian Moorthy
    Michael Obersteiner
    Alison J. Parker
    Maike Weisspflug
    Sarah West
    [J]. Nature Sustainability, 2019, 2 : 922 - 930
  • [10] Environmental upgrading and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
    Navarrete, Sabrina Della Santa
    Borini, Felipe Mendes
    Avrichir, Ilan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 264 (264)