On the Removal of Asylum Seekers to Third Countries and the Scope of the EU-Turkey Readmission Agreement

被引:1
|
作者
Ariner, Hakki Onur [1 ]
Kader, Yigit [1 ]
机构
[1] Deutsch Gesell Int Zusammenarbeit GmbH GIZ, Social Cohes Mainstreaming Promot Econ Prospects P, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
D O I
10.1093/ijrl/eead001
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The inclusion of asylum seekers within the scope of European Union (EU) readmission agreements signed with third countries remains contentious, especially considering that these agreements are instruments for removing irregular migrants to countries of origin or transit and do not regulate the responsibility for assessing asylum claims. Yet, the expulsion of asylum seekers from the EU to third countries is realized through a procedure whereby Member States are allowed the possibility of labelling third countries 'safe' according to criteria set out in EU law. The applications of asylum seekers arriving from safe third countries to the jurisdiction of the EU are deemed 'inadmissible', thus absolving Member States from assessing the applications on merit and enabling States to include asylum seekers within the scope of readmission agreements as irregular migrants. This article contends that the unique features of the EU-Turkey Readmission Agreement do not allow this practice in light of the main principles of international law, even assuming that Turkey can be labelled a 'safe third country'. These features include treaty provisions obligating the sending State to make every effort to remove persons to their countries of origin, as well as Turkey's explicitly declared position during the signing of the Agreement, which interprets the scope of the Agreement as not including asylum seekers. However, readmission of asylum seekers has taken place between the EU and Turkey through the EU-Turkey Statement of 18 March 2016 on the legal basis of the bilateral Greece-Turkey Readmission Agreement. It is argued that the EU's attempts to institute the EU-Turkey Readmission Agreement as the legal basis for readmission of asylum seekers are destined to fail, due to the legal impossibility stemming from the said unique treaty provisions, as well as the absence of any indication from Turkey that it intends to change its initial official position in this regard.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 439
页数:24
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] Safe third countries. Extending the EU asylum and immigration policies to Central and Eastern Europe.
    Van Selm, J
    EUROPE-ASIA STUDIES, 2000, 52 (03) : 581 - 582
  • [22] Competition in Third Countries What does the EU-Mercosur Agreement bring to the German Meat Industry?
    Beier, Elena
    FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 2019, 99 (09): : 65 - 67
  • [23] Infectious risk profile and strategies for prevention and control of outbreaks in refugee, asylum seekers and migrant populations in EU/EEA countries: a systematic narrative review of evidences
    Bianchi, Francesco Paolo
    Fiacchini, Daniel
    Frisicale, Emanuela Maria
    Gili, Renata
    Greco, Stefano
    Guicciardi, Stefano
    Ricco, Matteo
    Zichichi, Salvatore
    Zotti, Nunzio
    Tafuri, Silvio
    ANNALI DI IGIENE MEDICINA PREVENTIVA E DI COMUNITA, 2024, 36 (05): : 549 - 568
  • [24] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TURKEY AND THE SELECTED EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AGRICULTURAL SECTOR WITHIN THE SCOPE OF EU COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY
    Aksoylu, Deniz
    Orhan, Hacer Simay Karaalp
    JOURNAL OF MEHMET AKIF ERSOY UNIVERSITY ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES FACULTY, 2022, 9 (01): : 172 - 201
  • [25] Models of Differentiated Integration between the European Union and Third Countries and the Future of Turkey-EU Relations: A Neoliberal Approach
    Turhan, Ebru
    SIYASAL-JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 27 (01): : 95 - 120